why did third worldists side with maoist china over the soviet union and call the soviets social-imperialists when the soviet union supported far more national liberation movements worldwide and maoist china ended up coddling up to the USA?
was it because "white people bad"?
it's because when the soviet union criticized America, they used the n-word and laughed about it. :(
>>2813527>white people bad"Slavs aren't even white
>>2813549I live and was born in greater poland, i dont see myself as white. "Whiteness" is an imaginary label so you could feel good about yourself without doing anything
>>2813547russians aren't slavs
>>2813556lol Russian getting mad because i said he shouldnt take pride in doing nothing
>>2813557True…
>>2813581Tavğa bardım, tav kesmege
Taldı menim bilegim.
Oynamasam, külmesem
Yanar menim yüregim.
Men bir ava sımarladım
Aqmescit ustasına.
>>2813527Cuz Kruschev was a fat fuckin retard that didnt advance the highest social thought of Marxism Leninis.
Mao did.
>>2813724
let he who doesn't like to get shitfaced and rewatch k-on cast the first stone
>>2813732i cast this first stone
>>2813711>advance the highest social thought of Marxism LeninisExplain to me how Stalin, heavily disliked by Lenin, did that
>>2813785if i had all your necks on one rope, i would strangle you all to death
>>2813787Stalin didnt really developed new thought. He summarized others well. He carried Marxism Leninism in its truest essence.
He defended socialism from fascism.
Mao created true new proletarian thought.
The third world (who now is rising up) recognized Maoism as the highest stage of social thought.
>>2813809>He summarized others well.Who? Himself? He is not known to really like opposing views
>He defended socialism from fascism.By hiding in siberia? As far as i'm aware, he didn't really contribute much himself.
>who now is rising upOh is it now?
>>2813802Read his testament
>>2813824Who's the glasses girl with black hair in the middle? I've only read the manga
>>2813527I mean who's still around? Question answers itself
>>2813841Damn, she's adorable, i don't remember her from the manga. Maybe i should watch the anime someday
>>2813527VatniKKKs are untrustworthy, simple as.
>>2813826Nah like Engels. His work on dialectics was basically just quotes from Anti Duhring
>>2813527Cants say for every liberation movement ever, but as far as the Black Panthers go, that is more or less the case since black nationalists in Black America will sympathise with whatever entity they deem as anti-white even if incorrectly, such as Eldridge Cleaver who sided with Maoism simply because he thought the PRC was more anti-white (and that was before he decided to abandon his radical politics in favor of becoming an evangelical preacher and GOP shill).
Tbh, it’s not just third-wordlists. If you were to go back to the 70s and 80s, there were many anarchists, radfem and other new left-type activists producing entire writings on how they thought the USSR was le bad because it was ruled by patriarchal white men who oppressed gays and women and POCs, and other dumb idpol reasons.
>>2813846If the Soviet Union produced cartoons like this all of the youth would have been joining the Komsomol rather than listening to AC/DC.
Why don't you look it up instead of posting pure ass in this shit hole website
>>2815154thats what this website is for thoughbeit
>>2814448>most historically informed interpretation of sino-soviet split in leftypol grim…
>>2813826>testamentnobody falls for that anymore
Because revolutionary communism isn't about cheering for whichever side is perceived as having the bigger number. How was the Soviet Union involved in national liberation struggles? The Soviets were dragged kicking and screaming into a progressive role in Vietnam, with their involvement in national liberation struggles post-Stalin principally being self-serving and uninterested in establishing self-sufficient, revolutionary socialist states. Hence why every single "socialist" government established after the Indochinese revolutions collapsed soon before or immediately after the fall of the USSR. These weren't socialist or revolutionary, they were dependent neo-colonies.
You fail to understand the Maoist position because you look at everything as empty labels. To you, Communism is an aesthetic, politics a matter of vibes and "geopolitical" ""pragmatism"", and Maoists simply "call" others social-imperialists — you haven't bothered to do any amount of investigation to understand the essence of that critique or the meanings of these words.
>maoist china ended up coddling up to the USA
>was it because "white people bad"?
I couldn't possibly be rolling my eyes harder right now.
>>2815983It did cuddle up with the USA although, and also invaded vietnam, an indepedent revolutionary socialist state
>>2816262True my personal take on the Dino-Soviet split was that both sides bad but also both sides good
>>2816281They split the T-Rex in two ? I knew he was a revisionist
>>2816389It autocorrects sino to either Sind Dino or sink
Unique IPs: 24