[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1779569164711.gif (37.51 KB, 659x700, Anarchism.gif)

 

Let's be honest here: is there any actual difference between different forms of Anarchism beyond how one expects people to act without the state? It's not like there's policy or a DOTP.

It's just which authors you fanboy for

>>2821039
And which authors you hate.

File: 1779571812182.png (4.81 MB, 1536x2048, F4QL4qtasAAOY3-.png)

>>2821033
There is policy and a DotP, but in different forms. Policy is made by the people in popular assemblies and workers, not a centralized authority.

Individualist anarchism is harmful I believe. It loses its social character. It's probably the result of postmodernism and the New Left.

Useful anarchism: Kropotkin, Makhno, Chomsky, Bookchin, Daniel Guerin, David Greaber.

Ignore anarchists who oppose every form of organization

>>2821048
Bookchin rejected anarchism and had little to no value to anarchism. Chomsky was never an anarchist, he was an academic liberal and defender of bourgeois society. You are a libtard. The AC school of thought begins with the death of Bakunin, with Carlo Cafiero and Ericco Malatesta who take the objective analysis of capitalism brought by Marx, but reject the methodology of the self-proclaimed "marxists" followers of Marx and Marx himself on the thesis of instrumentality of the state instrument of repression.

Anarchism is just Nazism for queers and that’s the beginning and end of it. They literally have identical views and practices, only differing in the precise definition of the herrenvolk

>>2821048
> people in popular assemblies
Soviets, free soviets. Popular assemblies implies populism, that is rule of the majority over the minority not of the righteous and correct approach to resolving problems.

>>2821060
Modern anarchism, you cannot as a marxist distinguish between genuine and ingenuine anarchism because they are all your enemies in methodology and it is easier to clump them as one in a grand narrative to attack rather than take the time to analyze the different factions adhering to the name of "anarchism". But that would be like equating your school of "marxism" to Trotskyism, Stalinism, Maoism, Italian school of Left Communism ("Bordigism") and Dutch-German school while claiming "they're all the same". You are vulgar. YOU ARE VULGAR.

>>2821047
Reactionary subhuman still showing off great man worship when it comes to scum, misanthropy when it comes to everyone else

>>2821033
>different forms of Anarchism
There are different schools of thought, often in contradiction and in conflict with each-other, much like with Marxism. Calling it "forms" implies that they are all in unison in spite of differences, they are not. The same way anyone can brand themselves a "marxist" and espouse neo-nazi rhetoric does not legitimate them.
In fact, some of the biggest opponents of anarchism, identify themselves as "anarchists". It is the task of any remaining genuine principled anarchists, to do away with them first, before anyone else.
Quoting N+1 (Quinterna):
>What Is there a difference between you and other communist groups or parties? One should ask not what difference passes between "us" and "others", but what is communism and what it means to be communists. Unfortunately the existence in the world of thousands of groups and different "communist" parties demonstrates that the real question the most different answers are given, then understanding the explanations on the countless differences depends too much on the predisposition of those listen. In any case, the absence above all distinguishes us, in the our work, of all categories normally found elsewhere, such as the democracy, anti-fascism, parliamentary cretinism, frontism, the moralism about freedom and the person, individualism, trade unionism, centralism democratic, workerism, anarchism etc.

>>2821059
Bookchin was always an anarchist. His Democractic Municipality theory has been adopted by Rojava which is widely regarded as anarchist, although they don't call themselves anarchism due to its bad reputation, again, thanks to the "anarchists" who attacked Bookchin and Chomsky, just like you. Interesting that the only working projects are the result of the people you bash!

Malatesta has some good writings but he opposed organized programs which is one reason anarchism never took off. His letters exchange with Makhno prove this.

You are what is wrong with anarchism. Go back to listening punk and wearing black clothes fgt

>>2821062

Semantics. Free association is just democracy. A group of people willingly acting together, although it might hurt others, is no different from majority rule hurting a minority. Such events take place only in the imagination. We live in a collective, where conflict between parts must be solved trough democratic means. Fuck outta here with that pseudo-philosophy

File: 1779575538741.pdf (776.97 KB, 180x255, Kniga-Georgi-80.pdf)

>>2821033
>It's not like there's policy or a DOTP.
This is also incorrect, most AC disregard the dispute of DOTP as a semantics one over what constitutes an active dictatorship in the structural logistical sense, they disregard the word dictatorship as the active overthrow, liquidation of the bourgeois, self-abolition of the proletariat into class society to them does not mean the creation of a structure that upholds the function of suppression, but it is all done through coordinated efforts in overthrow, analogous to a slave revolt. Malatesta already addressed this over a hundred years ago, it is not your fault for not knowing it, since most self-proclaimed modern "anarchists" will tell you a hundred different things.
>policy
Federations constitute policies, a program, through means of consensus built on rational approach, therefore, everyone participating in the process, must be a materialist, it is not for deluded individuals to determine the fate of societal relations.

>>2821084
>Bookchin was always an anarchist. His Democractic Municipality theory has been adopted by Rojava which is widely regarded as anarchist,
Rojava is not an anarchist-communist project, it was a bourgeois liberal project aimed at creating an "autonomous space", they did not bring an end to the capitalist mode of production or relations characteristic of it, they did not bring an end to market economics, they did not end class, they did not end commodity production, it was akin to a national liberation project, they even upheld divisions on tribal customs. Democracy in all its forms if rule of the majority over the minority.
>, thanks to the "anarchists" who attacked Bookchin and Chomsky, just like you.
It wasn't me, I am an anarchist-communist, the ones who attacked Bookchin were post-left, primitivist reactionaries, Bookchin deserved to be critiqued for his liberalism, not for not adhering to reactionary individualist antisocial tendencies. Chomsky - he was an academic, academia serves the status quo, a reformist, a liberal and to give into character assassination a fucking Epstein associate.
>working projects
Anarchist-communism cannot be implemented in seclusion, to repeat the failures of the Paris commune, that is why Rojava failed even on its own merit of as a liberal project. Anarchist-communism is for internationalism, that does not mean espousing small "autonomous zones" until "internationalism is achieved", it is for the organization of the proletariat until the historically favorable time arrives for them to carry out a world revolution and change the mode of production altogether and with it societal relations. You are an infantile liberal with a false consciousness and a subpar understanding of communism, anarchism. You have no right to talk to me.
>You are what is wrong with anarchism. Go back to listening punk and wearing black clothes fgt
That is you, you fucking cretin liberal vermin, you are the punk, anarchism is punkerism to you, it is an aesthetic, to claim "a commune is more free" when the fundamental mode of production remains the same.
> Free association is just democracy.
Democracy is the rule of the majority over the minority. It is not consensus or rational argumentation.
>pseudo-philosophy
Your understanding of AC is inferior in every way. I am a part of an anarchist federation, you are an individualist LARPer on the internet guaranteed, all your understanding of it comes from the same few sites and video essays, ours comes from rigorous analysis and discourse.

>>2821084
>Malatesta has some good writings but he opposed organized programs which is one reason anarchism never took off. His letters exchange with Makhno prove this.
Malatesta's merit comes from an analytical, not methodological standpoint since methodology only comes from the creation of an active program for organization, i.e. Catechism of the revolutionary from Nechayev.

The lot of you internet "anarchists", especially at this time, it is midnight here, you are definitely in the US, where not a single AF part of IFA exists, worthless bastards, all you can do is defile the name further while engaging in more and more liberal activism. You will not be accepted into IFA even if you made more AFs until you prove to not be a retarded liberal by study and discipline. You may have the upper hand in propaganda, it does not matter, IFA does not concern itself with populist appeal.

>>2821084
I bet all my life savings, you are the type of retard that praised the EZLN for its "anarchist merit" without even realizing LN stands for National Liberation. And even if you understood that part, you would still find a way to justify it in your infantile retarded belief of what constitutes "anarchism" to remain a supporter of national liberations (i.e. "THE SMALLER THE STATE THE BETTER"), a syncretic moronic liberal abomination of "national-anarchism".

To reiterate a previous condemnation:
Some problems with modern "anarchists" :

•They support national liberation movements and/or nations.

•They choose the "lesser evil" from capitalist reactionary positions.

•They are not interested in material analysis or class analysis, only in identity politics (meaningless "cultural analysis" of races, orientations, genders, and similar issues).

•They concern themselves with cultural preservation (disguised conservativism) as opposed to societal development.

•They accept and present, or sympathize with, the most reactionary ideologies (like primitivism, nationalism, fascism, liberalism, monarchism etc.) as legitimate forms of "anarchism" by creating synthetic incoherent abominations.

•They don’t see a problem with participating in the market economy (hiring for wage labor, making profit, running businesses, etc.) and deny the need for a planned economy.

•They don’t see the contradictions between religion and science or deliberately ignore them and avoid criticizing certain religions (such as Islam) while creating contradictory modernizations (i.e. queer feminist anarcha-islam),

•They do not apply or know immanent critique.

•They see no problem in participating in popular fronts built on class collaboration in a battle against a "greater evil," such as fascism/"anti-fascism," in defense of the liberal bourgeois democracy that gave birth to it.

•They ignore contradictions between different positions and/or fall for the false and self-destructive contradictory notion of "left unity" (alliances with Marxists, Leninists, Stalinists, Maoists, Trotskyists, the left wing of capital).

•They are autonomists, not internationalists, and fail to recognize the need for a world revolution, instead focusing on regionalism, awaiting to be crushed or subverted.

•They are suicidally inclined and believe in adventurism or they support it by encouraging fruitless sacrifices.

•They fail to see the problems with activism, especially the contradiction of rejecting the state while protesting to demand reforms for "better conditions" (softer bourgeois power, to appease the workers - State Socialism was a set of social programs implemented in the German Empire that were initiated by Otto von Bismarck in 1883 as remedial measures to appease the working class and detract support for socialism [sic] )

•They deny, oppose or bastardize anarchist-communism.

•They reject materialism and praise utopianism, as their idea of "anarchism" is purely aesthetic.

•They lack fundamental knowledge and analysis of the capitalist mode of production (often due to rejecting Capital out of unprecedented anger towards Marx, yet no anarchist has written an equilivent of such a book besides Carlos Cafiero who took the time to simplify volume I and received a thanks letter from Marx himself).

•They reject uniformity, a program and/or are simply punks with a false-impression of contrarian thought.

•They glorify failed historical projects (Makhnovschina. Catalonia, Kronstadt) and seek fault in those who destroyed them, rather than analyze and acknowledge the failures in the fact they were unable to defend themselves and were thus unstable as to learn from the mistakes of the past rather than repeating / replicating it.

>>2821118
Insofar, the summary of this condemnation is the largely agreed upon consensus within the International of Anarchist Federations. A formal declaration on these lines will eventually be produced.

IFA as a whole has declared itself, to be against all bourgeois wars, following the last CRIFA congress and prior relations. That is, against lesser-evils. All anarchist federations composing IFA stand in line against all nations, national-liberation struggles. The associated projects of IFA may not hold the same views, although no objections have been made as of now.

File: 1779578516577.png (351.86 KB, 1723x1723, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2821124
IFA Congress 2026 joint statement -AGAINST GLOBAL DICTATORSHIP OF STATE AND CAPITALISM, AGAINST WAR AND FASCISM – FOR ORGANIZATION, INTERNATIONALISM & SOCIAL REVOLUTIOΝ

AGAINST GLOBAL DICTATORSHIP OF STATE AND CAPITALISM, AGAINST WAR AND FASCISM

ORGANIZATION – INTERNATIONALISM – SOCIAL REVOLUTIOΝ

The member federations of IFA are meeting in Athens at a time when the global situation is becoming increasingly critical for the exploited and oppressed classes. The general rearmament and the spread of war policies across various regions of the world, as well as growing authoritarianism and the rise of autocratic and reactionary models of government, is directly affecting the oppressed and is designed to maintain the capitalist and state system amidst a crisis of the dominant order.

Empires in collision

The decay and complete bankruptcy of the world of the state and capitalism marks the limit of its era of global integration, while simultaneously driving the intensification of inter-imperialist contradictions and the consequent rise of the threat of war. The state-capitalist system carries its contradictions within itself. The competition among bourgeois elites for better positioning on the chessboard—for the plunder and division of precious and limited natural resources, for the expansion of their “spheres of influence”—is what makes the sirens of war echo again and again. For as long as societies remain captive to the so-called “national interest”, to private profit, and to capitalist accumulation, war will remain the only path for empires in collision.

This is what is revealed in the most tragic way in the war slaughterhouse in Ukraine following the Russian army’s invasion four years ago, in the genocide of the Palestinian people by the state of Israel and its allies, in the brutal military intervention of the United States in Venezuela, the arming of militias in Sudan, and in the continued strangling of the people of Cuba.

US-Israel attack on Iran

Within this context, on February 28th, the US-Israel military operation against Iran was launched with intense bombardments, with the indirect support of NATO infrastructure, and continues to this day. The people of Iran, having first been drowned in blood—once again, as so many times over the years—by the regime following the popular uprising that erupted in January 2026, now find themselves facing the bombs of Western imperialism, responsible for so many military operations around the world.

The hypocrisy of Western regimes knows no bounds: at the very moment they collaborate seamlessly with all the monarchical, authoritarian, and theocratic regimes of the Middle East—Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, Bahrain, and others—they instrumentalize the Islamic Republic regime in Iran to cloak their crimes in a supposed “liberating” guise, crowned by the cold-blooded murder of more than 168 children in bombardment of Minab.

Fortress Europe and increasing global repression during continuous crisis

The victims of imperialist, predatory, and neocolonial wars and interventions are always the people themselves, who are butchered in this global slaughterhouse or forced to take the road of migration only to meet death at the land and sea borders of a Fortress-like Europe. The murderous “push back” policies of the EU are reflected in the thousands of dead refugees at land and sea borders, in those trapped in modern concentration camps, and in those imprisoned under a special racist state of exception. The “walls” being raised serve not only to keep “surplus populations” out, but also to lead Western societies toward the consolidation of internal fascism, creating a social condition of fear and hatred.

Today, at a global level, we find ourselves in the midst of a historical phase of continuous reconfigurations, accelerating events, and intensifying rivalries that signal a violent transition toward a new historical period—one in which the preexisting order is in crisis, attempting to preserve its bloodsoaked gains through the intensification of repression, military escalation, and the deepening of exploitation.

Multipolar realignments and the generalization of authoritarian state power

In the dominant discourse of international politics, the “multipolar world” often appears as a more balanced and therefore more just form of global organization and hierarchy of states -a new condition of equilibrium. From the standpoint of the oppressed, and consequently from the standpoint of anarchists, the term does not describe a decentralization of power for the benefit of societies, but rather a realignment of the hierarchy of states and capitalist elites who are on a collision course. A multipolar system means that global power is distributed among multiple poles: the United States, China, Russia, the European Union, Israel, India, Iran, and other regional powers—none of which can any longer impose the rules of the game alone. This is not, therefore, a matter of less power or some retreat of power blocs, nor of a more just distribution of power. It is a matter of competition among more rulers who are vying for their places at the same table of exploitation.

The basic characteristics of such historical periods are multiple poles of power, asymmetric forms of strength, dynamic shifts in balances, and the challenging of traditional notions of sovereignty—all of which take on a different meaning when viewed through the class lens of those below. For movements and peoples, these poles are not neutral centers of influence but mechanisms of imposition and war machines, economic empires, technological surveillance systems, borders, and camps. Each power paradigm promises protection and development, demanding in return discipline, markets, natural resources, and cheap labor.

The present historical conjuncture is characterized by a double and seemingly contradictory movement: on the one hand, the attempt to transition to a multipolar world without a stable hegemonic center; on the other, the generalization of authoritarian, fascist, and totalitarian forms of governance. These two movements do not contradict each other. On the contrary, the second is a condition for stabilizing the first. Multipolarity, as has been said many times, does not give birth to peace but to generalized competition, and this competition requires disciplined, fearful societies ready to accept sacrifice as normality. Fascistization no longer manifests as a mass movement with a unified ideology, but as an everyday administrative practice. Borders that kill, police forces that function as armies of occupation, a state of exception that becomes permanent, the criminalization of poverty, migration, and solidarity. In this context, the concept of necropolitics no longer concerns only zones of violence, but the overall organization of the world. Power no longer merely manages life—it actively organizes death, whether directly or indirectly, through famines, sanctions, economic embargoes, blockades, and perpetual precarity. Death ceases to be considered as a failure of the politics of “the era of development and capitalist prosperity” and becomes its instrument for overcoming crisis conditions.

Western powers would like to force a hegemony which is not expressed simply through the politicalmilitary system. Today’s “unipolarity”, which violently unifies the planet, manifests through global capitalist integration, which expresses across different geographies the same unified logic of capitalist exploitation and state repression, incorporating within it different cultural, religious, and local particularities. While the rival blocs may seek their ideological identity on the basis of these particularities, in opposition to the dominant Western paradigm, this in no way signifies the transcendence or challenging at any level of the unified state-capitalist mechanism of power, exploitation, and oppression.

Anarchist rejection of selective anti-imperialism and opportunism

Today we are living through a period of distortion of meanings and values, and the need is even more urgent for the anarchist movement to construct its political, ethical, and ideological framework—both for the awakening of consciousness among those below and for the defense of its positions against attempts to impose foreign conceptions regarding the anarchist struggle and internationalist solidarity. These attempts are rooted in authoritarian tendencies, primarily of the left-winged politics, and are expressed through support for totalitarian state formations, condemnation of popular uprisings, alignment with power blocs, consciously false binaries, emotional blackmail, slander of militants, and threats—all dressed in the superficial cloak of anti-imperialism.

The logic of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” always leads to the same dead end: silence about the crimes of the new and opportunistic ally, justification of their violence, and dismissal of the struggles they suppress internally. Thus, anti imperialism is transformed into a geopolitical tool, losing all its libertarian content and analytical substance.

From an anarchist perspective, this is unthinkable. There is no imperialism without the state. There is no imperialism without internal repression. The same structures that expand outward also discipline inward, within class-stratified societies. The same mechanisms bomb, imprison, torture, and exterminate—and whoever pretends not to see this is not practicing anti-imperialism but political coverup.

Proletarian internationalism does not choose states, flags, or poles through opportunistic alliances— though this does not mean it will not use the internal contradictions and cracks in the system. It chooses a side in social struggles: it stands with workers, with refugees crushed at the borders, with conscripts and deserters, with prisoners, with the insurgents—with all those who pay the cost of imperialist rivalries, wherever they are. It does not pass through foreign ministries or geopolitical calculations. It passes through internationalist solidarity from below.

In a world where new regional or even central powers are emerging, the challenge is not to choose the “right” or “oppositional” imperialism. It is to reject them all. Not to baptize the realignment of power as liberation. Not to confuse a crack in unipolarity with a rupture with the system. A rupture with the system occurs when we deepen these cracks, make them more profound and insurrectionary.

Our position is clear: against every pole, against every state, against every war of the masters. With those from below, without taking sides or accepting false choices. This is the only anti-imperialism that does not betray itself.

Appeal for internationalism and deeper connections

The dynamic changes and upheavals that the rulers pursue demands the rapid reorganisation of the anarchist current at an international level. The urgent need to expand the network of contacts and communication among anarchists internationally is proven by the facts themselves—with the primary aim of exchanging experiences, sharing information about how the politics of domination are taking shape in each geography, and about the social resistances emerging at every point of the planet. Furthermore, discussion at the international level regarding the war condition and the generalized threat of war is critical, as deepening this discussion—along with the corresponding cooperation of anarchists internationally—are basic prerequisites for strengthening the struggle, that is, the social and class resistances themselves that can protect societies from the threat of war and the intensification of exploitation and repression.

It is literally a matter of life and death—for the movement, for societies, and for the oppressed—to develop and adopt the most coherent possible anarchist stance toward militarism, the threat of war, and resistance to global domination. We believe this can be achieved if comrades all over the world manage to recognize that while there are visible historical, political, social, and even cultural differences among particular societies (and therefore among movements)—which are necessarily formed under the shadow of the nation-state and which must be respected—at the same time, it must be noted that today’s anarchist analysis identifies a unified state and capitalist condition that dominates and oppresses the entire planet.

Against this condition we must stand in unity—whether it is expressed through the warmongering hegemonic Western coalition of the USA-NATO-Israel, through bellicose Russian authoritarianism, through the oppressive obscurantism of Islamic regimes, or through bureaucratic Chinese state totalitarianism.

Solidarity with struggles across the globe

For our part, based on our principles and values as organized anarchists, we intervene and act in the fields of social and class struggle, aiming for class and social emancipation against every form of tyranny—not to serve one or another tyrannical regime, state, or interstate bloc. We stand in solidarity alongside every people fighting for survival, dignity, land, and freedom against the global dictatorship of the state and capitalism, colonialism, and imperialism. We draw inspiration from people struggling across the entire world who, facing the monster of fascism, state and capitalist barbarism, rise up, strike, demonstrate, and fight the brutality of power. These are the elements of struggle we wish to highlight as anarchists: the ability of the conquered to counterattack against the all-powerful conqueror, the capacity of the poor and excluded to revolt under even the most barbaric conditions. We want international solidarity to create ruptures within the attacking rulers, bringing to the forefront our own history—the history of the struggles of those below who, against all times, create the living reality of freedom and solidarity, constituting the only real bulwark against the advance of modern totalitarianism.

Until the total liberation of all people from the chains of the state and capital—until the Social Revolution for a world of equality, solidarity, and freedom.

International of Anarchist Federations (IFA-IAF)

April 3–5 2026 – Athens, Greece

>>2821127

The current members of IFA in 2026 are as follows:

ArgentinaArgentine Libertarian Federation (Federación Libertaria Argentina)FLA
BrazilIniciativa Federalista Anarquista no BrasilIFAb
BritainAnarchist FederationAF / AFed
BulgariaFederation of Anarchist-Communists in Bulgaria (Федерация на Анархо-Комунистите в България)ФАКБ/ FACB
Croatia & SloveniaFederation for Anarchist Organizing (Federacija za anarhistično organiziranje)FAO
Czech Republic & SlovakiaAnarchistická federace (Anarchistická Federácia)AF
French-speaking (France, Belgium, Switzerland)Anarchist Federation (Fédération Anarchiste)FA
German-speaking (Germany and Switzerland)Federation of German speaking Anarchists (Föderation deutschsprachiger AnarchistInnen)FdA
GreeceAnarchist Political Organisation (Αναρχική Πολιτική Οργάνωση)APO / ΑΠΟ
Iberia (Spain & Portugal)Iberian Anarchist Federation (Federación Anarquista Ibérica)FAI
ItalyItalian Anarchist Federation (Federazione Anarchica Italiana)FAI
KurdishKurdush Anarchist Forum (Sekoy Anarkistani Kurdiy-zman, ANARKISTAN Facebook page, Associated Project)KAF
MexicoFederation of Anarchists in Mexico (Federación Anarquista de México)FAM
SicilySicilian Anarchist Federation (Federazione Anarchica Siciliana)FAS

>>2821093
In reference, the notion of direct democracy is often used interchangeably for consensus decision-making forms, out of popular appeal of the term, not its notion of a correct description, it is understandable in informal talk and propaganda, internally it is debated.

>>2821138
In essence, everyone understands what the other means by "direct democracy", no one is certain to die behind the word - NAME of "democracy". In practice it has come that the term has become subjective to different fractions, rather than seeing the difference from the history of the term. It is subject to change. When forms of planning through consensus are established, it will no longer be necessary to use that name. Economic planning has too many proposed forms as of now to determine which is the correct approach, this can only espouse organically by seeing what works via proof of work, not proof of concept. There are numerous forms of planning, numerous forms of consensus, decision-making, the most efficient are to be mended into the future program.

>>2821118
Looking forward to whatever results your larp yields! Sure it’s taking its time, idiot!

National liberation projects are just a step towards communism. Can’t have communism when your resources are extracted by foreign powers

>>2821149
National-anarchist liberal, you are an american larper and are not part of any anarchist federation.

>>2821149
Here are the "results" of your debauchery

I don't care much about what theory will conquer the world but I know that the anarchists I settled with are way, way more equilibrated and sane people compared to every other far left group I got into. Trotskyists/MLs are crazy and locked on a dude that died 80 years ago. Socdems have the insanity of believing in electoral circus.

It's twisted but anarchists are the only thing left of the first international

>>2821149
Workers seizing the mop is not the same as enacting a national bourgeois domestic parasite.

>>2821150
I’m not part of any federation because joining is hard. Not because of stringent requirements but because contacting it is hard. You fgts never go public but live in the shadows playing the cool guys. Truth is you haven’t accomplished anything

>>2821157
Not only that, even the most secluded national bourgeois continue market relations and are subject to the global capitalist mode of production. It is a contradiction to imply a secluded nation "controlling its resources" is a step towards communism, a fascist nation can meet the criteria easily.

>>2821159
>because joining is hard.
Joining is hard because no one will accept you larper. Anarchism is against all rulers - without rulers, anything that legitimizes the nation state is harmful and inherently against anarchism.
>You fgts never go public but live in the shadows playing the cool guys
LOL, say that to APO which have taken over entire cities, which provided an entire building for the last congress Lelas Karayanni 37. Tell that to the italian anarchists who have entire villages and families of anarchists raising anarchists.

>>2821165
Last congress had nearly a thousand delegates from all over the world - DELEGATES (figures sent to represent only, not the entire composite of federations) and yet a national-anarchist larper wants to belittle it saying "you have not accomplished anything larpers you hide in the shadows'. This is why America will not have a federation admitted into IFA anytime soon.

File: 1779580829593-0.png (624.11 KB, 600x600, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1779580829593-1.png (1.08 MB, 1171x878, ClipboardImage.png)

Wheres the hiding when all AF have a place of gathering?
Who is hiding in the shadows here?

File: 1779580875695.png (5.33 MB, 2048x1536, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2821172
LK37 who is hiding?

In bologna there is an event in semptember about anarchist documentation centers. There is no one from africa coming cause there is no anarchist library there. I think some of us should go over there and spread the word, this whole continent of ultra exploited proles is in dire need of theory

>>2821175
The Sicilian Anarchist Federation and Italian Anarchist Federation brought up the matter of having lost access to contacts from Africa needed for the Mediterranean to have an Anti-militarist network. They and others involved in a working group are on the matter of reaching out to anarchist organizations in Africa.

>>2821176
Feels like business speak to me to say nothing will be done. There is zero anarchist groups in africa that matters and it's where the exploitation of workers is the most acute

>>2821193
This includes any potential chapters of IWA-AIT willing to collaborate.

>>2821193
Let's not act like this is just a page someone made up. When I see people like you, so sure of yourself, talk about anarchy, I cringe. You need some reflection on yourself

This thread has been far less entertaining than I thought it would be

>>2821204
Do you read? I wrote inquiry is needed.

>>2821206
I expressed my disgusted feelings toward your formulation. There is no more to say

>>2821211
After looking deeper, it appears to be operated by some Norwegian organization excluded from IFA, which has later continued to cling to the idea of being IFA. Pitiful thing full of schizophrenic texts, for one I cannot find anything regrading the supposed extent of it claimed in the texts - no contact information whatsoever provided for a large presence, it is likely that this "Anarchists Confederation of Africa" was entirely made up.

>>2821236
Hahahahahah what a schizophrenic I dug up, looking for anarchist organizations in Africa, a lone norwegian schizo claiming to be IFA.
Amazing piece of history, the fossil is still going, what a nutcase. I gotta share this with the comrades, such a fossil still exists.

>>2821240 (Me)
I will delete the replies containing the schizo site, since it doesn't deserve to be promoted.

>>2821087
Consensus is worse than democracy. Bookchin already explained this

>>2821048
Chomsky did more damage to anarchism than good imo, sure he made it much more popular and even helped me down the path but with that has come a lot of new anarchists who don't really understand it and his "abolition of all unjust hierarchy" quote is way too vague imo

>>2822210
Democracy is rule of the majority over the minority, it is mob rule, it is unprecedented populist and illogical, consensus requires reasoning and deduction whereas democracy does not, democracy has no principles and Bookchin was a renegade gone complete liberal.
Bourgeois electoral democracy seeks the consultation of the masses, for it knows that the response of the majority will always be favorable to the privileged class and will readily delegate to that class the right to govern and the perpetuate exploitation.

>>2822839
More-so means of consensus hold different forms to provide unique solutions for different situations, certain forms of consensus already hold the mechanism of a quick decision on a majority basis, but they are not used unconditionally, they are used when a decision has to be urgently made without delay, all decisions made have to be conducted through rationale not favoritism.

File: 1779727807266.png (261.34 KB, 443x496, ClipboardImage.png)

Incredible level of retardation

"Google Murray Bookchin" is a perfect example of peak opportunism.

Up until recently anarchists hated Bookchin because he'd denounced anarchism and formed his own ideology.

But as soon as PKK began adopting a bastardized version of Bookchin's ideology and became the big players in Kurdistan anarchists have welcomed Bookchin with open arms.

They've even tried to claim that Bookchin's ideology, one that he specifically developed in response to what he saw as the limitations and flaws of anarchism, is merely a different strain of anarchist thought and that Bookchin was an anarchist all along.

Basically they started liking Bookchin again because his ideas were gaining popularity. Now if that isn't the definition of opportunism, I don't know what is.

>>2822861
As an interesting aside, Janet Biehl, Bookchin's ex-wife and the only other major social ecologist theorist publicly broke with the ideology in 2011 (though she confessed to having been a social democrat since at least 1987).

>>2822857
>There would only be private property to the extent that people elected to engage in private property society
Peak example of Bookchin liberal democratic retardation >>2822210
You are fucking liberals usurping the name and symbolism of AC, you are not in any federation

File: 1779728475704.png (666.91 KB, 698x657, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2822869
Actually existing democratic confederalism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonome_Nationalisten


Unique IPs: 11

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]