[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1780567119973.jpeg (199.89 KB, 986x986, attatchment.PqLp3o.jpeg)

 

What is bigotry? Unfounded prejudice. At least, that’s the definition that I’ll be using here, and which will serve as a parameter for this discussion, considering how loaded the term has become in recent times. Without further ado, let’s get going.

Lately I’ve seen self-proclaimed “leftists” and “communists” often engaging in the kind of bourgeois moralisms that they usually decry, but often targeted towards groups that are still socially acceptable to hate and bash (both rhetorically and physically) on much like gaybashing was popular in the 1980s. And honestly, that both saddens and baffles me.
For once, it clearly shows how incoherent and unprincipled certain “leftists” can be, especially when they try to attack rightists for their bigotry and idpol crap, or do the same with woketards. Now, reactionary undercurrents of the kind seen in Bakunin’s and Mao’s writings and actions (Bakunin’s anti-semitism and Mao’s homophobia for example) aren’t unknown, but what baffles me most is how many leftists and communists will engage in bigoted spiel towards certain minorities whilst attacking reactionaries for using the same spiel but directed to their favorite minority of the day, much like liberals. Case in point, how many leftists hate MAPs on a vitriolic level solely for their sexuality, whilst hypocritically decrying homophobia from the right, as if they aren’t the same as homophobic chuds.

It also baffles me because it’s clear that this reactionary tendency within the left isn’t coming from a place of logic nor an understanding of Marxist or any other leftist theory, let alone scientific materialism. Instead it comes from a place of emotion and a general unwillingness to question popular bourgeois moralisms of the day or current psyops. Going back to the EXTREME example of MAPs: Despite the fact that most child molesters aren’t MAPs, the fact that there’s no evidence adult-minor sex is inherently harmful as proven by Rind et al. (1998), the fact that pedophobia is rooted in both the notion of sexuality being inherently harmful and the notion that humans below the magic age line are somehow all asexual, as well as how the reactionary movement uses pedophobia as a way to socially conform normies into being fascist as shown by how most “predator hunters” are chuds, the fact that every social media platform owned by capitalists make it clear in their TOS that even anti-CSA groups like VirPed can be banned just because they don’t 100% dehumanise MAPs, and despite state censorship of the matter (The American Congress’s universal condemnation of Rind et al 1998 and the same government burning Wilhelm Reich’s works, and Stephen Kershner being put under an investigative commission that lasted longer than the Warren commission being examples of unprecedented attacks on scientific and academic research in modern history), plus the exceptional existence of the SOR given that there’s no equivalent for convicted murderers and thieves in spite the former being worse than statutory offenders and the latter having some of the highest recividism rates, higher than sexual offences too if the same metric is applied to all, among other egregious factors…
We still see leftists going along with this bourgeois and carceral system since they need a spook to latch onto, and what better way than the spook of the child molesters.

At no point do we see so-called leftists ever question the conservative underpinnings of the pedo panic such as its emphasis on stranger danger despite most cases of actual CSA being done by family members and by institutions such as cops, nor question the middle-class and puritanical foundations of the modern “grooming” and “sexualisation” panics which are basically just re-hashes of purity and honor culture complete with violence against any male who dareth violate the purity/virginity/innocence of the girl. Indeed, as you’ll note, much of this regressive conservative attitudes the mainstream left supports is misogynistic as it relies on the demonisation of young female sexuality whilst that of boys is never really constrained. Funny that 🤔.

Just like the left likes to call chuds pedos for supporting adult-youth marriage and being unabashedly heterosexual, the right loves to call lefties pedo for supporting trans kids and sex ed in schools.

Indeed, whether it’s pedocon theory or homofascism theory, both are absurd attempts to map sexuality into politics in a way that is bound for contradictions and failures. After all, for every Epstein, there is an Evo Morales. And for every gay or trans communist, there’s always a Douglas Murray and for every trans leftist there’s always a Brianna Wu. Yet I don’t see the same standards being applied towards “valid” sexual and gender minorities like trans and gay people, and that’s less to do with some “enlightenment” on their part than it has to do with how the Overton Window has shifted to the point of making both transphobia and homophobia stigmatised in leftist circles, but the same can’t be said for pedophobia since if they moved on from that then they’d actually have to argue for their opinions based on its merit as opposed to calling others the p-word till they shut up and let themselves be steamrolled. Just like Contards LMAO

Even as far as Marxism goes, the basis for pedophobia is non-existent. Marx wrote In practically in non-moralistic language when it came to adult-minor sex, and in those bits he was trying to shock the bourgeois!
all AES countries, all have an AoC below 17, with the USSR famously setting it at puberty whilst Cuba set it at 12, and China at 14 (the age the youngest “victim” of Epstein is claimed per court records). And let’s not forget how consent itself is literally just liberal contract theory as applied to sex, and a very recent one pushed by the liberal bourgeois and which normies don’t really think through (e.g., since consent is said to be an ongoing process, can one withdraw consent after the sex is done and would that count as rape? Is sex by deception rape?) considering how even in feminist Scandinavian countries it wasn’t until the 2020s that a consent-based definition of rape was adopted in their legislation, and so far no country in the world has yet to ban sex by deception, very galling since lying under false pretences in any other case would be seen as making the contract void.

You can’t be a communist and support the AoC. It’s impossible. Why? Let us analyze the question dialectically. To start no communist should be using rhetoric about the Epstein affair other than in a completely self-interested way to delegitimize the system. Why? Because revolution is not a dinner party. It requires red terror. The foundation of the dictatorship of the proletariat is red terror. Red terror must be like the air we breathe. Can you really be angry about the age of consent and Epstein while practicing red terror? It’s only possible while using it as prop to manipulate the most cattle-like normies, the most alternatively petit-bourgeoisied or lumpenized segments of the proletariat. But the limits very soon become apparent. The weepy soccer mom evangelical moralism that leads people to grand emotional outpouring over Epstein’s sexual relations with teens is incompatible with the titanium spine required to practice red terror. Red terror requires hard and ruthless new men who will do anything to destroy the class enemy— this cannot be reconciled with weepy pseudo-Christian moralism that leads he average normie to have psychosexual emotional meltdowns over the fact that some Jewish guy had sex below the magic age line. If you search your heart you know this to be true
All in all, there’s no leftist nor atheist basis for pedophobia. So why all the hate and support for their oppression in spite of how it gets negatively externalised onto us, whether it’s the grooming panic affecting trans and gay people to the point of affecting legislative decisions, pedo bashers moving onto immigrants and leftists, social media censorship and state surveillance expanding under the pretense of fighting against “online predators”, etc…?

If you want to be a liberal so badly, fine just be one. But don’t pretend to be a leftist or revolutionary for supporting the current thing and newer psyops.

File: 1780569348036.png (129.56 KB, 372x422, 1771168428374837.png)


sage, report, tell others to do the same #DEATHTOPEDOWAFFEN


Unique IPs: 3

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]