>>2843794Not necessarily nationalism as much as patriotism, which I think taps into an innate tribal instinct in humanity. But it doesn’t necessarily have to be nationalism, as seen by how tribal fandoms can be, and those are based on consumer items, as well as the fact in pre-modern history where nations didn’t really exist religion and place of birth and familial lineage often took precedence for people’s identities. Now, tradcons may say nationalism is somehow more “rooted”, but I beg to differ as nationalism can be thought of as a fandom in and of itself or a proto-fandom of sorts because there’s no country with unbroken heritage between past and present. Not India, nor Sumeria, Babylon, the Roman Empire, any number of post-Alexandrine Hellenistic states, the Hand dynasty, the Inca empire, or even the Frankish empire.
So in this sense, the mythos of the nation-state can be deemed as a fictional product made by elites from which a fandom is formed, and modern Macedonia is a case study. Many dismiss it as fake despite the conception of Macedonia dating back to the 19th century. By those same standards, one can dismiss ANY nation-state as “fake” insofar that they’re invented by somebody as opposed to being some organic product.
As for a multiracial proletarian revolution, while a common cultural background is needed, I think history has shown that more than race and ethnicity what trumps it all is a common and shared national experience and a mythos on which to base it. For Cuba, it was the Cuban revolution. For the USSR, it was WW2. For America, it is the civil war + civil rights revolution.
I think time will tell when that will happen for the world.