[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1782751898432-5.mp4 (24.74 MB, 1280x720, Sally.mp4)

 

The following text was originally going to be a response to a now-deleted thread and has been modified so it does not go to waste

Although zoos sometimes get a bad rap for being "Animal prisons" they can actually be quite good for animals, depending on the animal in question and the conditions it's held in. The idea that having animals in captivity is always inherently bad is just not true. While measuring the happiness of a large group of animals isn't exactly easy, there isn't any good reason to assume that a dog, for example, is better off in the wild than in a house. Wild dogs live shorter lives, experience more stress and are sick more often. Still, many animals obviously cannot be held as pets and to do so is abuse (Big Cats, Large marine mammals, Primates other than humans). Zoo animals, assuming it's a professional zoo (Especially a non-profit), are generally either fine living in captivity or, while typically better off in the wild, have defects that makes it unable to do so. This is why you don't really see any large scale advocacy against zoos or owning pets as a concept, instead it's against specific zoos or specific pets. Personally, my experiences with Zoos have been confined to the Philadelphia Zoo, which is run by a non-profit organization and generally considered to be ethical, so my understanding of them may be biased. Nothing is perfect or ideal in any zoo, but I don't consider it to be an inherently evil institution, at least no more than any other institution under Capitalism.

Meanwhile, with circuses, they are ultimately using animals for entertainment in a performance sense, unlike zoos where just seeing the animal is the entertainment. This means making them do tricks and putting them in unnatural situations. They also often use elephants which basically aren't supposed to be in captivity at all. This is why the aforementioned Philadelphia Zoo removed their elephants. What I have read about circuses with animals generally does not exactly scream "ethics". I certainly don't trust them.

And for the record, I think you should try not to dismiss anything PETA says as being automatically nonsense. I don't support PETA and I feel that the theory that they're basically a front for the meat industry isn't impossible but on many occasions I've seen them outright tell people the truth just to have everybody whine about it. The other day they were telling people not to let their cats roam freely outside. This is literally true, it's bad for the cats and it's absolutely fucking terrible for the natural wildlife. If a cat MUST go outside they should wear a harness with a leash. So many species of birds have gone extinct because of house cats, they need to stay inside. I personally have 3 cats and they're all indoor. Ask basically any professional and they will tell you the same thing. A similar thing happens with veganism, which is undeniably the most ethical choice regarding one's diet but is maligned by even most Leftists as being nonsense. I'm not a vegan myself but it's literally impossible to argue against advocacy for the practice.

>the theory that they're basically a front for the meat industry isn't impossible
As someone involved in an animal liberation group, I am also critical of a lot PETA does but absolutely do not believe this.
Their behaviour can be adequately explained by the types of pitfalls NGOs tend to fall into.
They care before anything else about getting a lot of donations so they can keep paying their "volunteers", as a result they waste a lot of time on attention grabbing campaign stunts instead of getting results.
They are "the biggest animal rights group in the world" by a bunch of meaningless metrics that get nods of approval in a committee

>>2853942
The worst crime of zoos is space. You see it with farm animals too if they’re kept in one fenced in area for too long, they get a kind of psychosis. When you confine animals that are meant to roam freely to too small an area it’s a torture akin to solitary confinement in humans. Rarely do I go to zoos and see animals being physically abused or malnourished, but every zoo I’ve ever been to has had at least one animal in a pen only a few lengths long with no space to run and that’s always heartbreaking.

Circuses are awful though I haven’t gone to one in years and if I ever did go back and they pulled out an animal I’d leave immediately.

File: 1782771152734-8-0.png (3.89 MB, 1920x1247, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 1782771152734-0-1.png (458.97 KB, 600x400, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2853942
Yes. Zoos tend to do and fund a bunch of conservation work. Animal rights people are split on them, tbh. I think it's dependent.

>>2853942
The vegan perspective opposes animal use, as using other living beings is prone to harm them.
Especially animal ownership for financial exploitation is problematic, as funds for animal wellbeing are dependent on profitability.

Animal exploitation for food is massively contributes to multiple apocalypse level threats - which a rational mode of production would avoid:

Zoonosis
Efficient animal agriculture is an incubator for animal borne disease, and there are regular outbreaks of such diseases that have killed millions, and this will continue killing millions, constantly, there is a risk of covid-level pandemics or worse popping up.

Leading killer diseases
Animal products are known to contribute to the leading causes of deaths by causing cancer, ciabetes and cardiovascular disease, which is just not the case for equivalent plant foods. This leads to millions of early deaths, years of disease and disability.

Global warming
Huge emissions come from animal agriculture. Most crops are grown for animals, while only a small part of our protein and energy intake comes from animals. Most arable land is used for animals, most deforestation is done to further animal agriculture.
Some aestimations put the contribution to about 20% of carbon equivalent emissions.

To me, it just makes sense to both adopt vegan ethics and consumption behaviour in order to prefigure a rationally planned economy. Furthermore if comrades go vegan, they may even have more time and energy to enact the change we would like to see.
Also vegan nutrition is cheaper even in the developed world, elsewhere it's even more of a luxury.
This is why the global north leads in the consumption of animal products.

Going vegan just makes sense.

i need animal to eat it

end of discussion

>>2854882
Plants are living things with feelings too, they scream, you just can’t hear them

File: 1782944121289-1.jpg (12.53 KB, 480x360, dale in thought.jpg)

Can you be pro animal and plant but anti women?

>>2855420
>Plants are living things with feelings too, they scream, you just can’t hear them
No they are not you abject imbecile. Stop consuming pseudo-science.

>>2856014
You’re still exploiting a living thing

File: 1782945594969-2.png (206.58 KB, 346x417, ClipboardImage.png)

>>2856041
Anon. You just tried to tell us
>>Plants are living things with feelings too, they scream,
How about you shut the fuck up and sit this one out.

>>2856053
They literally do, they respond to painkillers and release stress pheromones when they get cut, they get sick and die. Vegans are hypocrites.

>>2856057
yeah ok fam I'm sure the arugular I'm eating is suffering just as much as some pig getting brutally slaughetred.

Anyways, I feel like the whole vegan discussion is moot. People are too dumb and selfish to give up eating meat. They don't care about how animals are killed and exploited just so they can have their steaks and bacon. Honstly it's made me give up on humanity ever achieving socialism when even so-called "leftists" can't do something as simple as giving up meat

>>2856160
I’m willing to give up factory farm meat if I’m allowed to hunt overpopulated prey and invasive species, it’s way better to live your whole life free then get struck down than to live in a pen waiting for it

File: 1782971297878-0.png (822.84 KB, 850x478, ClipboardImage.png)

Yes yes animals and plants deserve rights but what about fungi? I think the mycelium networks should have a voice in the socialist government and influence the five year plan. Lenin spoke of this.

>>2856254
Whenever I consult the mushrooms they just tell me to keep on keeping on

>>2856254
Fungi rights should take precedence over all other rights.


Unique IPs: 11

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]