[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internet about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


 

NATO is being warned by the US that a Russian attack is imminent.

https://m.novinite.com/articles/239429/Is+Russia+Planning+an+Attack+on+Poland+to+%22Test+NATO+Resolve%22#google_vignette

First they attempt to capture Ukraine and that fails horribly in every way possible, so now the nuclear giant is attempting to start war with the NATO union. I know there are people who like Russia here, but saying that they accomplished their day 1 objectives is pure cope. They first tried to send a "special military operation" to oust the president and create a pro-Moscow government in Kyiv. Lost. Then they tried to build a land bridge between Donbas and Crimea through Odesa, then capture Moldova to build a land bridge so they seize the rest of Ukraine going northward. They STILL haven't even completely taken Donbas. They got deeply entrenched in hardcore urban combat in Mariupol for 85 days, and even when they had the advantage and all the cannon fodder in the world, they still couldn't completely crush resistance in the city and their leaders are free to this day to kill more Russians. As a result of the holdup, they redeployed troops to Kherson and lost there as a result. Ukraine still has Black Sea access after they won Mykolaiv, Russia lost a major naval destroyer - the Moskva, using a cheap Bayraktar and two Neptune subsonic ship missiles after it ignited the magazine! What the fuck?! Now it's a frozen conflict. So, instead of dying on that hill, Russia wants WW3.

WW3 incoming. Stay notified for happenings.

Preddit NAFO noncesense fearmongering. These losers have been crying about Russia invading them forever to justify increased defense spending and expanding the natsec state

>>2858390
Peoplexsaid the same thing about Ukraine before it happened.

Russia would never attack the west

>First they attempt to capture Ukraine and that fails horribly in every way possible, so now the nuclear giant is attempting to start war with the NATO union.

So you just say things without thinking about them at all, huh?

>>2858384
>Russia planning attack on Poland to test Nato resolve, US warns
Did no part of this headline ring any alarm bells in your head?

>>2858403
NATO doesn't want war with Russia neither does the US. It's the other way around. Russia has a ton of nukes.

>>2858398
Wagner Group and Russia's most capable are all gone. How do you respond to this? Remember Krynky when the last remainders of the VDV got wiped out?

File: 1783190035993-2.mp4 (183.62 KB, 562x360, NIr07K87Jn_6CCiw.mp4)

>>2858384
This apparently started as a sensationalized thing that started in Poland ("working from reporting by the Polish outlet Onet") about what ~could~ happen and you can never be too careful which is then getting re-written by The Telegraph (glowie paper) about some kind of Russian plan.

>Notably, the Guardian's June 26 report on the same underlying concern included a qualification that has been largely dropped from subsequent coverage. It noted that the warnings "came with only limited supporting detail, unlike the more detailed intelligence released by the CIA and MI6 ahead of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022." That is a direct comparison, made by the outlet reporting the story, between the evidentiary basis for this warning and the evidentiary basis for the warnings that preceded the actual 2022 invasion.


>Lithuania's Ministry of Defense added a further qualification on June 29, days before the Telegraph story ran, stating that it saw no signs Russia was preparing a large-scale military attack on the Baltic states, though it assessed the risk of sabotage as high. That assessment came from a government directly named as a potential target in the broader reporting.

You didnt even read the article you are linking fag. Mods, crush his skull.

>>2858410
If they're all gone and can't even conquer ukraine then why are they going to attack poland and by extension all of nato

File: 1783190717241-9.png (1.24 MB, 1116x814, 1775602751118.png)


>>2858394
This would be my reaction too if CIA hadnt been right about Russian invasion of Ukraine.

>>2858398
homie is getting paid by the powers that be to shitpost here

on one hand, nothing ever happens, on the other hand CIA was warning russia would invade ukraine and no one took them seriously until russia did.

i give this a 25 percent chance of happening


Unique IPs: 11

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]