All societal systems that have existed since humans became sedentary roughly 10,000 years ago are fascist. Before that, for nearly 95 percent of our species’ 300,000-year history, humanity lived in hunter-gatherer or forager societies. These communities had no permanent hierarchies, no inherited positions of power, no state institutions and no ruling class at all: decisions were made through collective consensus, and people with particular experience or skill held only temporary authority rooted in mutual respect, never the power to coerce others. They were entirely classless and egalitarian, with land, tools and hunting grounds held as common property, food distributed according to need, and no exploitation of one group’s labour by another. There was no organised state violence, no standing armies and no large-scale warfare between communities; internal conflicts were resolved through mediation rather than repression. Gender relations were broadly equitable too, as women’s foraging work supplied 60 to 80 percent of most groups’ food supply, earning them equal social standing. Groups were small and flexible, usually made up of 20 to 50 related people. This form of organisation is known as primitive communism: the default way humans lived for almost all of our history, before sedentism gave rise to the fascist systems that have defined every society ever since.
Except we have zero actual proof of how they lived, outside of observing modern day tribes and making assumptions from that, also funerary traditions, that's all we have
Fascism is when shit i don't personally like
The Sentinel island guys? These are fascist piece of shit and we should denazify them
>>2883868Okay but it's incredibly unlikely that there were hunter gatherer landlords isn't it?
I'm sure some groups were primitive communist and democratic, and others were tyrannical, and this probably changed over the generations back and forth, but we can say pretty much for certain that there was not an organised system of class control as we have today. Perhaps some chiefs would have some strongmen by which he could enforce order but it seems very unlikely that he could impose total tyranny when everyone was armed to basically the same level, and it was easy for a group of people to just decide "fuck this" and take all their shit and leave.
>>2883872How? They were willing to make peaceful contact with outsiders until things went wrong. They made their position abundantly clear that they didn't want those missionaries on their island, they didn't just shoot them with spears right away. They were defending themselves. Maybe they consciously knew that the outside world would inevitably destroy their way of life or maybe they didn't, but either way they have a right to self determination.
They're not totally ignorant of the outside world either by any means, there was a couple of anthropologists who met with them for decades and probably taught them a whole lot about the outside world - plus it would be impossible for them not to notice some parts of modernity like planes, big ships on the horizon, etc.
>>2883873Day 1621 of the 3 day evangelisation. Islands still closed btw.
Fascism is liberalism
Liberalism belongs to the capitalist mode of production