Joseph Stalin is the most reviled opponent of the liberal bourgeoisie. No one causes more lib seethe than Stalin. The man was also firmly socially conservative and anti-cosmopolitan. And most importantly, he won the fucking war and died on old man at the height of his power, and the Soviet empire he built survived for decades afterwards.
So why is the online right still in love with a miserable loser like Hitler? Why are chinlet shooters and insecure browns still chanting "Hitler was right" instead of embracing the chad superiority of Stalin? Are they just stupid?
>>2901413Because Stalin was too pro social and the fact that his country actually survived for decades of boring peace makes it unattractive to fash who want to die gloriously. Plus the modern far right is basically just downstream of the cold war tendency to lionise Nazi Germany while decrying the USSR as simultaneously incompetent and laughable but also about to take over the world any second
>No one causes more lib seethe than Stalin
Hitler is much more reviled than Stalin.
>>2901418Kinda but Hitler is viewed as a joke figure, liberals are more scared of "trots" than they are of Nazis
>>2901413>Immediately denounced by his successor>Empire stagnates and collapses in just 40 years>Even the Chinese, who nominally broke with the USSR over their betrayal, themselves pivoted to a market economy to save party ruleSo this is the power of Stalinism…
>Karl Marx
Because chuds have a fetish for immorality. They think that stalin was some red nazi who committed genocide and war crimes.
>>2901429China did not ever denounced stalin
China did not collapsed like USSR
Explain?
>chad bullshit
Read a book instead of simping out for vibes bullshit
>>2901448They didn't have to denounce him in words when they did so in deeds.
>>2901487nafoid tier bait
>The man was also firmly socially conservative and anti-cosmopolitan.
No he wasn't. The USSR was by far the most socially progressive country in the world at the time. It was the only country in the world where racial discrimination was illegal, it operated the world's largest affirmative action program, it was the only country in the world that actively encouraged women to enter the workforce and pushed them into sciences, management, etc. Stalin rolled back *some* of the most socially progressive policies of the early Bolsheviks, but by comparison to the rest of the world the USSR was extremely socially progressive. He only seems conservative by modern standards, but this was not the case at the time.
>>2901446Maybe that's just a UK thing then, over here the establishment tries to appease/coddle the far right while ruthlessly crushing the actual socialist left
>>2901418They're usually presented as equivalents by liberals.
Anti-Stalin leftists only come in two kinds
>still libminded
>christpilled cuck that hates anyone who wins and is strong
>>2901413>Joseph Stalin is the most reviled opponent of the liberal bourgeoisie. No one causes more lib seethe than Stalin.yeah hell yeah
>The man was also firmly socially conservative and anti-cosmopolitan.uh oh it's a retard thread
uh oh anon thinks stalin's "conservatism" is what made the bourgeoisie seethe
as for "cosmopolitanism" 90% of the time people who bring this up are defending bourgeois anti-immigration and anti-minority policies in CAPITALIST countries on the ground that it's what Stalin would have wanted or some schizo shit. No Stalin would have wanted you to overthrow your bourgeoisie, not beg them to gun down migrants fleeing climate change. You silly little bastard.
Unique IPs: 18