https://duihua.org/two-restraints-one-leniency-part-i-chinas-ethnic-minorities-and-criminal-law/>China’s criminal policy of “Two Restraints, One Leniency” (liangshao yikuan 两少一宽) was enacted during the administration of reformist leader Hu Yaobang (1982-1987). Derived from a Soviet-era policy that granted regional autonomy and preferential protection to ethnic minorities, the policy had the intended purpose of strengthening the political loyalty of ethnic minorities in the multi-national country. Hu believed that granting sufficient autonomy to members of ethnic minority groups was indispensable for safeguarding national unity. To this end, Hu improved ethnic representation in politics across autonomous regions. This progressive policy was reversed by Deng Xiaoping and Hu’s successors. In 1984, Hu pushed through the Central Committee Document Number Five, a new criminal policy which called on law enforcement to be lenient towards criminal offenders from ethnic minority groups by making fewer arrests and handing down fewer executions and lighter sentences to ethnic minority offenders.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liangshaoyikuan>Liangshaoyikuan (Chinese: 兩少一寬; lit. 'two fewers [in arrests and executions] and one leniency [in sentencing]'), was a policy of the government of the People's Republic of China of giving leniency in charges and sentences with regard to minorities as compared to Han for the same criminal offenses.[1] The policy was enacted in 1984 by Peng Zhen and Hu Yaobang. On July 9, 2010, a statement jointly published by the Publicity Department of the Chinese Communist Party, State Ethnic Affairs Commission, and United Front Work Department suggested that "everyone should be equal before the law, and criminals should be punished regardless of their ethnicity". However, they do not have the legal authority to challenge a policy implemented by the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, a higher authority; the policy has thus never been officially repealed. - Is Xi even involved in either of these?
- These are each woke policies.
>Two Restraints, One LeniencyWoke, compensates for inevitable discrimination by cops early on.
>everyone should be equal before the law, and criminals should be punished regardless of their ethnicityRemains woke while acknowledging that tensions have eased up that compensatory lenience isn't needed.
China is literally a woke diverse society
>>2908307Forced assimilation of minorities is super woke
>>2908315Minorities can have multiple kids and even hunt with guns and have hundreds of affirmative action programs, the CPC are as oppressive to the Han supermajority as the Manchu Qing dynasty was
>>2908316better tell the Uighurs and Tibetans that
>>2908316At least right now, Chinese people want Uyghurs, Turks, and Tajiks to have children because they find them more attractive. They are vastly overrepresented in modeling in China.
>>2908318Uyghurs and Tibetans are literally a privileged class in China above the Han, quit swallowing western propaganda
i would suicide bomb XI PIGPING if I could
China is proof you can be woke without being gay 🤔
>>2908489Jimmy Neutron, transgender, Bud Light, Target, Mexico, Somalia, college campus, woman.
>>2908492Forgot black people in ads
>>2908490Don't look chinese male models, they have the same taste as korean
>>2908174I love how its really hard to tell if its some True Socialist's China Bad thread or some rightoid rat abandoning the foundering ship known as MAGA. Given how people are promoting "Free Tibet" and the "Uighur Genocide" in this thread and Ultras love their regime change narratives, probably the former.
>>2908307>China is literally a woke diverse societyChina is neither "woke" nor "anti-woke" because it doesn't need to cynically appeal to identity politics to justify itself. Besides, "woke" as most people understand it doesn't really exist outside of North America.
>>2908487>i would suicide bomb XI PIGPING if I couldOf course you would. Maoists Glow out of every conceivable orifice just like Islamists. Unironically worse than Trotskyites.
>>2909007>Besides, "woke" as most people understand it doesn't really exist outside of North America.It's used as a shorthand for "socioeconomically aware," so like any non-retarded policy given it's circumstances is inherently woke.
>>2908174China has the biggest affirmative action program in the world (and that's unironically a good thing)
>>2909042Seeing her get in and out of clothes so quick is unironically a good selling point for those clothes. Like it makes them seem like they'd be easy to get on in the morning.
>Is Xi Jinping anti-woke?
Idk, but he sure is an anti-communist.
>>2909073uyghurs really be saying anything these days
if he was anti-communist he would have already pulled a gorbachev and dissolved the party's political authority retard
>>2909007Look up Kazakh genocide in China. There you get all the tropes of deranged anti-Sovietism you expect, from insane reading of statistics, claiming that before communists there were twice as many Kazakhs as after the Revolution, to "more than half of Kazakhs died when they tried to escape to India! It must mean commies were masking genocide by claiming it was a migration!", to "Kazakhs have always always ALWAYS opposed communists and fought for FREEDOM!"
>>2909113he can maintain power by continuing anti communist policies through the CCP
>>2909073For the last time doing communism in the "wrong" way isnt comparable to being anti-communist or being a traitor.
I think Stalin was an incredibly harmful ruler but to call him anti-communist is nonsensical, he dedicated his life to it. Same for Pol Pot.
>>2909126>Stalin was an incredibly harmful ruler>Same for Pol Pot.Neither were bad or harmful. You are lapping up anticommunist propaganda of the lowest grade and reiterate it without much touch. As Mao put it, no research, no right to speak. And no, wikipedia is not research
>>2909129Anti-communism isnt when you think a communist ruler did stupid things either.
>>2909132Anticommunism is when you spread lies about communism, mostly. Which you do
>>2909007>Besides, "woke" as most people understand it doesn't really exist outside of North America.This is true.
>>2909152USSR was mainly destroyed by Russian majority separatists who believed that Russia was being drained to feed the minority republics
>>2909224The URSS would've been dismantled even if 80% of the entire population would be in favor of keeping it alive, the votes were about legitimacy (like the ones for the EU) not about policy
>>2909229This would be impossible in a communist society
>>2909287
There was nothing ever said about communism having “infinite possibilities”. That is not a scientifically proven value.
>>2909294
So you’re against scientific socialism? Figured that’d be the position of someone who thinks they can just vote themselves out of communism.
>>2909300
>The only successes of “scientific” socialism so far are spreading capitalism to the semi feudal semi colonial nations of the world
That in itself is historically progressive, which is a success.
>the proletariat wholly rejects it in the advanced capitalist world and for good reason
<Source: my ass
>if implemented it would just be the status quo but slightly worse
And how would it be slightly worse?
>>2909315
>It’s not historically progressive
A feudalist now? Interesting
>the proletariat is not a revolutionary class in the first world, in fact there is no revolutionary class in capitalism at all
And a revisionist? Fascinating.
AES dumbass
Unique IPs: 23