Let’s say hypothetically the Democrats win the next election. Then what? Aren’t they part of the same cabal? Are they actually interested in prosecuting Republicans, de-escalating anti-immigration initiatives, releasing the Epstein files, etc.? Biden made it clear how Democrats secretly continue whatever the Republicans have done with Israel as the most egregious example. People see MAGA stepping down as a relieve, but with the Dems the lying and heinousness doesn’t end. So what’s the plan?
There is no plan, it’ll keep swinging back and forth between dems and reps until either wet bulb temperatures, nuclear war, or the JDPON D Day landings
You're not going have any noticeable change as long as vampiric boomers are still in office.
>>2915219Xers and especially Millennials are worse
Honestly revolution is really starting to look likely in our lifetimes
Just have no idea if it’s gonna be a reactionary reaction or a communist one.
Liberals will stop paying attention to politics, they will go out to brunch. Democrats will have to fix trumps messes, fix the economy, if they fail that then a republican wins in 2032.
No, they will not prosecute republicans, are you stupid, that would set a precedent meaning that presidents can be prosecuted. they didnt do it to bush, who is a war criminal, they wont do it to trump.
the thing about American politics is the extremists on the left and right are small in number, to win you have to appeal to the moderates, independents, and centrists. The growing hispanic population is also important, but i think they arent blue or red, they are purple, and can go either way.
>>2915221>Honestly revolution is really starting to look likely in our lifetimesIf I was an evil poster then I'd create a bot that would reply to posts like this with messages like "Hmm I'm not sure about that."
>>2915224holy cringe did you stroll on in from a ShareBlue meeting or something? Fucking hell.
>WE MUST APPEAL TO LE MODERATES GUYSkill yourself people like you are the reason Amerikkka is so shit.
>>2915221Reactionaries already blew their load wrong. It’s over for them.
>>2915867nod an arguement
undersocialization and/or personal resentment and/or being baited by rage posts do not stop people from being able to say truthful things. typical ad hominem attacks in order to dismiss what others say.
>>2915878Ad hominem is not in itself a fallacy, it’s only a fallacy when used to dismiss a specific argument. You’re not even logic pedant-ing right.
And in my personal experience, the terminally online are usually wrong about everything because they lack understanding of the world around them so their basic premises are flawed
>>2915904>he didn't commit a logical fallacy<proceeds to commit the same logical fallacy uyghur I'm going to tie your nipples to a car battery and sodomize you with an electric baton until you learn to stop committing ad hominems and actually start debating people without referring to their real or imagined personal characteristics. your sophistry is off the charts.