Let's see if you agree with me, people.
I've come to the conclusion that race, gender and sexuality, in this order, are core identities in humanity and many others if not exactly derived, are strictly related to it.
Origin/nationality, culture and social class are REALLY important but have a social, less inherent condition to these more physical, intrinsic qualities I listed.
A working person will always have a race, gender and sexuality, this unifies everyone but also divides people, and a corporeal human being will always make part of a social class depending on his or her place in society.
Left and right are the two main political divisions, from which all others are related somehow. It has to do with progress, equality vs. hierarchy, property, economic intervention and societal roles in general.
Furthermore: politics, science, religion, art and philosophy are the main social and cultural expressions of humanity. These are the ways we organize, understand and express our existence in reality.
Economics is important, but it is more like the "matrix" where things happen.
All these things are related in a complex, conflictuous, changing and multipolar/multidimensional reality.
We know we are all one in some sense, but separated individually still being more or less part of the whole in a way, fighting for social issues and material needs.
Not sure what I am talking about anymore.
The fact is, I don't see material reality separated from social constructs, they always interact amd it is hard to determine like a perfect map of humanity or society.
This is more or less how I see the world.
How you guys think a marxist overview about my vision would be? I understand some marxism, but I am not an orthodox person, I think we should come up with better and more complex explanations without losing grip of the essentials, if you understand me.
Picture slightly unrelated.
Nice manifesto, throw it in the pile
>How you guys think a marxist overview about my vision would be? I'd call it incomplete but on the right path.
>I've come to the conclusion that race, gender and sexuality, in this order, are core identities in humanity and many others if not exactly derived, are strictly related to it.>Origin/nationality, culture and social class are REALLY important but have a social, less inherent condition to these more physical, intrinsic qualities I listed.<As though race and gender are not socialYou'll need to be clearer on what "culture" means.
>Left and right are the two main political divisions (…) It has to do with progress, equality vs. hierarchy, property, economic intervention and societal roles in general.And what do they mean? Progress where? Does "the left" nessecarily disagree with heirarchy?
>Furthermore: politics, science, religion, art and philosophy are the main social and cultural expressions of humanity. These are the ways we organize, understand and express our existence in reality.This is essentially just saying "human activty is the activity humans do." It's not nessecarily wrong but it's not saying much.
>Economics is important, but it is more like the "matrix" where things happen.Expand upon this. Why is the economic, the reproduction of human life, not the foundation upon which all else is constructed? What does it mean to be a "matrix"?
>The fact is, I don't see material reality separated from social constructs, they always interact amd it is hard to determine like a perfect map of humanity or society.Marx would agree!
>I understand some marxism, but I am not an orthodox person, I think we should come up with better and more complex explanations without losing grip of the essentials, if you understand me.I suggest parsing more marxist theory.
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htmStalin isn't nessecarily the pinnacle of dialectic thought but it's a good place to
start.
>>2925145Not impressed by this.