Is gender identity inherently subversive of leftist ideals?
Is it neoliberal in practice?
Any and all resources appreciated
It's inevitable, ideas around gender have been shifting even within a single given society since we invented the concept.
>>1981No since gender is a necessary part in being in a society.
Your brain wants to be and act with people of the same gender it thinks it is.
>>1984If it was femcel it'd be argued biological essentialism of how genders are
>>1981They just are. Read theory please.
>>1981The abolition of gender could mean either the end of associations between genitalia and behaviors or the shattering of "male" and "female" into uncountable hyperspecific microgenders. I'm happy with either outcome, but as technology advances and it becomes possible to switch fully between male and female reproductive organs it's inevitable that gender will fade away like class and the state.
>>1986Good friend I'm just giving it the benefit of the doubt, to not be played into counter-revolutionary mindset with ignorance. that's all
gender identity has always existed
i once heard that lenin wanted to abolish make-up in the soviet union for an authentic feminism, but his wife or other wome chose to perpetuate it instead
>>1989That doesn't say anything about the ontological necessity of gender identity or even about whether "abolishing makeup" is a good idea. It's just proof that there is inertia to many societal habits that can't be stopped just by declaring them abolished or illegal.
yes
idpol, genderpol etc are all neoliberal deviations and distractions
there is much more to life than your orgasms
>le identity
>le subversion
>le ideals
>stalin pic
fucking lol