/lgbt/ - LGBT

Anon there's a reason you thought the question is dumb.
Think about the world population. How many of them are poor? And how many of them are middle class?
Using basic statistics you can figure it out. Leftypol is unfortunately full of reactionary retards who make the dumbest arguments possible.

Transsexuality and homosexuality are innate, so there shouldn't be any difference between classes. The only thing is that the poor can hide it to avoid being persecuted.

bump

op you already got two good answers to your retarded question, no need to bump
I guess you're fishing for a reactionary to go on a homophobic screed

No, most LGBT people are poor and marginalized, because they're systematically oppressed, duh.

But as with anything, the economically empowered get to have their voices heard.

>>5478

???? i was bumping this to remind myself to respond to this earlier and also so it won’t be archived afterwards wth

>>4941

>Leftypol is unfortunately full of reactionary retards who make the dumbest arguments possible

not surprised. siberia is filled with sexists and hostility from what i’ve observed so far

>>4939
you have to define the category 'middle class' for it to be meaningful. 'LGBT community' should also be defined (do you just mean "LGBT people" or do you mean the specific, online, english-language america-centric LGBT community?)
most of the online LGBT community are downwardly mobile lower middle class westerners, with a weird sort of distribution that means the loudest voices are either unemployed and impoverished (lots of time to post, not much else to do), or upper-middle income. (they do a popular podcast about gay movies and posting hot takes doubles as advertising)

but this is a function of a bunch of selection biases (there aren't too many papuan tribesmen with an income of $444 a year posting in english on twitter.com even before you look for the sub-set who're LGBT, and the sub-set of that sub-set who want to talk about LGBT things with foreign strangers they'll never meet irl) rather than because of the distribution of LGBT people themselves.

>>4939
gay and trans are trve proletarians, unless most of them dislike my take on AI art, in which case they're petit bourgeois roaches being proletarianized

>>5540

my take is better than yours

Worth noting that there's a measurable trend of downward class mobility for usamerican trans women