There are some things I don't understand about transphobes:
Why is it that when a man displays an attitude or behavior that isn't typical of his sex/gender, he's immediately treated as an incomplete man or a sissy, but when it comes to trans women, they immediately say he's a man, a complete man trying to deceive society? I mean, either do you believe that one can lose their status as a man or a woman, or do you believe that biology is absolutely binary? You can't believe in both (I mean, a eunuch should be as masculine as The Rock, but these idiots wouldn't see it that way).
Another thing I've been thinking about is this:
On the one hand, they tell a trans person that they will never be the sex they were born with, mainly because of their genes, but on the other hand, they don't care about those same genes when it comes to unnatural body modifications, like steroids, breast implants, etc. I mean, if a trans person isn't a man, then I, who am bald for example, and get a hair transplant, would cease to be bald phenotypically but not genetically. The funny thing is, if I went to a meeting of bald people, they'd kick me out even though I'm genetically bald. Unless you're a Lamarckian, the argument doesn't hold water.
By the way, many TERFs say that trans women invalidate women's suffering. This reminds me of when deaf people say that those who use hearing aids invalidate their suffering. And let's not even talk about conservatives who claim to protect children from mutilation but remain silent when discussing circumcision. KEEEK
pd. sorry the syntax im not anglo