blanchardism should be formally and explicitly banned from this board
it is total pseudoscientific drivel that hurts trans people, especially trans women.
We have a site-wide mandate against wojaks and pepes, but not against this bullshit?
blanchardism fails to meet even the bourgeois scientific standards of validity, let alone the scrutiny of dialectical-materialist analysis
it's a crackpot theory concocted by an ameriKKKan Klanadian cishet boomer moid working in the aKKKademic mediKKKal SSience establishment.
All blanchardist lingo should result in an immediate ban lasting 3 to 7 days, with repeat offenders being permabanned.
If you can't defend your point of view and run to the mods for help, then this only proves that Blanchard was right.
>>5228there's nothing to defend.
blanchardism has been debunked even in bourgeois academia
this is like a nazi racist saying "if you can't defend your position against eugenics and run to the mods for help, then this only proves that Blanchard was right"
kill yourself
>>5230
>>5231
reported :)
>>5232this is clear proof that blanchardism is a reactionary force, thus reinforcing my point
>>5226>ameriKKKan Klanadian cishet boomer moidI thought Ray Blanchard was gay
>blanchardism what's that?
<experience sexual arousal at the idea of having a female bodyThis idea proves to me that for 100 years before ChatGPT, liberals have been degenerated, neutered creatures who take no pleasure in being alive. A liberal thinks its weird to feel happy about your body because they are basically like a soulless machine. When a liberal stretches their back, they don't groan, they have no pleasure in their soul being contained within a body. Apparently liberals only go to the gym to exercise because of capitalist reasons. They are automatons who have no qualia, they have no subjective, conscious feeling of experiencing life.
>In philosophy of mind, a philosophical zombie (or "p-zombie") is a being in a thought experiment that is physically identical to a normal human being but does not have conscious experience.[1] For example, if a philosophical zombie were poked with a sharp object, it would not feel any pain, but it would react exactly the way any conscious human would. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_zombie >>5239anon to say you completely missed the point and went totally off the rails would be an understatement
>>5239P-zombies don't exist and probably can't exist, it is a kind of reactionary thought experiment that eveyrone is npcs.
>>5239The reader of this post Knows they are not a p-zombie, and are not. It is possible that they exist, but why? and if some exist, why not everyone?
equating these complicated issues to people just 'being stupid' anyways is only good for disregarding societal problems. It's far from material analysis.
p-zombies are impossible because consciousness is a material phenomenon, because everything is, therefore it's not possible that in two identical configurations of matter, one would have consciousness and the other doesn't
we don't have to retread cartesian dualism over and over again
>>5228how does that prove blanchard is right? moron
everyone is a p-zombie except me
youre completely right, "AGP" is basically some psuedoscientific shit to make trans women hate themselves for shit cis people do daily: enjoying their bodies, being turned on by them, self love, etctera. it's the kinda shit that cis people do as a self esteem boost or at most a curiosity that they don't even think about. for trans women it's some mark of shame like they're supposed to be especially pure and devoid of enjoyment to avoid being pathologized
KILL ALL BLANCHARDIANS NOW ALL YOU DO IS HURT TRANS PEOPLE BECAUSE YOURE RETARDED
>>5364i am the only existing p-zombie and everyone else is actually a conscious person
>>5367
zombie eat brain, p-zombies don't necessarily have to do so
>>5365AGPs exists, there are transes who admit as much. that doesn't mean every trans is AGP
>>5380Bodily self enjoyment and admiration exists
"agp" is the pathologized categorization of a real experience
If a trans person falls for calling themselves "agp" its as invalid as someone leftist and rebellious accepting that they have a pathologizing "oppositional defiant disorder"
In the end if said people accepted those terms they would be acting against their own interests and understanding themselves through the oppressor's worldview
>>5386yea it exists to pathologize people who have real experiences
>>5380Only ones brainrotted by the insidious reactionary /tttt/ ideology.
>>5380Cis women experience AGP, and cis men experience AAP. Being turned on by the affirmation of your own gender role in a sexual context is a pretty normal part of human sexuality. I used to date a cis girl who got super turned on when I told her I was gonna keep her in my kitchen barefoot and pregnant. I don't see how that's so different from trans women being turned on by the affirmation of their gender identity.
>>5395Literally the first worthwhile post itt
>>5395>super turned on when I told her I was gonna keep her in my kitchen barefoot and pregnant. that's masochism my guy
>>5401It's a breeding kink which is a form of AGP.
>>5429
Oh it was a joke, a really long joke. You just don't get it yet.
>>5226no, we need schizos to make fun of here
reminder that the entirety of Blanchardian pseudoscience was essentially a grift for him and J. Michael Bailey to groom trans women into having sex with them (particularly the latter). the entire typology was invented as a gatekeeping cope making up some bullshit to explain why straight trans women are real women and the ones who weren't willing to get raped by doctors to get access to HRT and surgeries are actually fetishistic men. when you support Blanchardism you support the gatekeeping practices of bourgeois pseudoscience and rape and are a transmisogynist.
>>5226Would you include the terms autosexuality , metasexuality and analloerotism?
>>6477basically, as i understand them. Autosexuality is everything that gets labeled as AGP, AAP, AGAMP, AAGAMP. Which is when your sexual attraction is linked to your similarity or capicity to embody your subject of attraction. It can be paired with other sexualities, but in general it's mostly seen in gay people (ex. transbians) or asexuals of some kind.
Meta would be the case of using someone else as a contrast for your own sexual gratification. Take for example a trans woman who has sex with men not out of attraction to their bodies, but rather the validation she gets from her ideas of womanhood or the way they make her feel physicaly (mas-fem contrast).
Analloerotism is lacking sexual attraction for people in any conventional way (homo, bi, hetero) but still experiencing arousal from other sources (such as meta, autosexuality or fetishes) and seeking sexual pleasure (in this case asexual would be in contrast the complete lack of both sexual acts and arousal, anallo is just there to allow some breathing room and clarification over the label of asexual)
>>6491sounds like made up western shit
albeit making a solution to a problem you yourself created.
>>6492it's just describing behavior that is both observable and reported by people who experience it. Your rejection of any kind of insight into sexuality seems to be solely motivated by it "sounding white, becuase it comes from white scientists" which, following that logic, would have us rejecting any bit of science developed by people in colonial powers or with their direct funding. Sure the circumstances the first breakthroughs came into being are awfull and their first uses were clearly those of opression, but simplifying things just for the sake of it because everything more complicated "feels icky and western" is just retarded.
>sounds like made up western shitBecause it comes from studying sexuality in western cultures, which have great influence in others, although not directly similar, so more research would be required
>albeit making a solution to a problem you yourself created.sexuality is a created concept, so trying to understand how it developed and finding new ways of both describing it and steering it into a better future for all is essential. When not used to pathologize sexual expression, what i descrived in my other post is a great tool for improvement away from rigid oppressive sexuality. In a way, your desire for simplicity only helps the western-imperialist way of being.
>>6494>>6494what are you even talking about? i mentioned how this cathegorization and study was used to otherize and subjugate trans people and made a point to emphasize how that's not the only way this studies can be taken and developed in the future, what else do you want me to say? You are just putting words in my mouth at this point. Go back to twitter, retard
>>6504ok, ok, i apologize for calling you retarded if all of that was a misconception. Pay better attention to writting patterns next time
Unique IPs: 26