Instead of calling to "abolish the family", we should promote single-parent families which inherently rely on consuming socialized production of goods and services more than multi-parent families. Single-parent families drive up demand, are more profitable and develop the productive forces.
>>725823%
No wonder the burger mongrels turn out to be so unhinged
>>7313How do you explain Israel? It's only 5% there.
>>7320Israelis are not 'unhinged'. They are calculating lying manipulating faggots. They have a clear strategy and they have been winning for almost a century now.
Lumpen-yanks are erratic. They just chimp out, without a plan.
>>7324death to the Zionist scum
*sniff sniff* I think i smell bourgeois POV
>>7261>>7307This seems reactionary. The family is already falling away. The choice is between a bullshit nuclear family or no family at all. Historically, matrilocal societies were very common actually.
>>7332actual westernslop take
>>7327The idea that groups of families living on collective farms and working together is “reactionary” is bordering on madness and comparable to saying communism itself is reactionary.
>>7258Wrong.
Single parent families are at a bigger risk of instability
What we need is to go back to clans.
>>7332Most matrilocal families were still supported by male elders
>>7337This. It’s another subtle attempt at radlibfem fantasy of gynocracy
>>7343Exactly. A female-led hierarchy is still a hierarchy, and replacing an old hierarchy with a new one ultimately changes nothing. We need to go back to clans on collective farms working together.
>>7348I’m convinced there’s a link between lib left and authright
>>7343>>7348You can't go back to clans, this is a reactionary desire. Read the origins of the family, private property and the state please.
>>7357People still live in clans.
Also calling clans “reactionary” is delusional.
What is delusional is supporting single parent families as the new vanguard
Alot of single-parent families often have to rely on daycares and other institutions that don’t have their best interest
>>7258As someone who raised in a single-parent household, I'm in concurrence but think you are painting with a wide brush. I was pretty spoilt.
The only thing I missed out on was healthy relationship modeling which is something that affects me to this day, and there are plenty of kids in traditional families that were not raised by healthy couples.
>>7359How are clans good in any way. They are literally just a patriarchal formation. Like seriously read the book because it talks about what clans are, you might mistake them for being socialistic or communal, but this is not a modern family form and it is a patriarchal one. And daycare and institutions will have their best interest in socialism.
>>7362> And daycare and institutions will have their best interest in socialism.Which means that collective child rearing is the way to go.
The nuclear family is a patriarchal invention as well. It encourages atomization by treating kids as bipedal pets.
Kids are not allowed to have their own affairs independent of mom and dad.
Under the nuclear family, kids are barred from worldly development.
>>7363You are like a broken clock lol Newgene
>>7258I support multi-generational households and giving more rights to children and less to parents. In particular in terms of health the child's well-being should be prioritized in all cases, the parent's consent should not matter (because real life is messy you could have an appeals process so it's not a single doctor making a bad decision, but parents should not have the final say at the end of the day). In particular vaccinations must be mandatory.
>>7364Coming from posters who whine about gender dysphoria or being perpetually virginal that’s quite hypocritical
>>7370“Parental rights” should have asterisks attached.
I also support third party adults helping in child rearing.
Most importantly, I think life skills and basic blue collar skills should be mandatory in schools
>>7364Yet this thread shows that everyone else disagrees with you
>>7372>I also support third party adults helping in child rearing.I agree and I think this used to occur naturally but suburbanization has led to less community and more alienation.
>>7374It’s no coincidence why we have the saying:
“It takes a village to raise a child”
>>7333This is literally Engels' take.
>>7337Agrarian communism literally is the definition of reactionary.
>>7343>>7348Communists don't want to abolish all hierarchy, that's anarchists. And I mentioned matrilocal exactly because I abhor the radlib matriarchy fantasy.
>>7359Socialist daycares will be better. This is like complaining that capitalist factories you work at don't have your best interests at heart.
>>7370Tenement hall + food court + public education
how about a ternary parent family
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_ternary#Other_applications>consider a currency system with coins worth 1¤, 3¤, 9¤, 27¤, 81¤. <If the buyer and the seller each have only one of each kind of coin, any transaction up to 121¤ is possible. >For example, if the price is 7¤ (7dec = 1T1bal3), the buyer pays 1¤ + 9¤ and receives 3¤ in change. any possibly family combination is possible…a truly modern family
I've yet to see a left-winger go and volunteer to babysit or teach somebody's kid, they always come up with bullshit excuses or say they have autism and kids running around and screaming gives them a panic attack or something like that.
>>10253But i though thats le gay anarkiddie adventurism???? The TRVE communist praxis is reading theory until you die of bed sores?
>>10253The overwhelming majority of babysitters, preschool teachers, elementary school teachers, pediatricians, children's therapists, and academic pedagogues are Left-wing, at least in my country. You're out of touch.
>>10259>>10260I mean those leftists who call for the family to be abolished and for the whole community to raise the kids. They never actually try doing that.
>>10283>I mean those leftists who call for the family to be abolishedso like 5 people on twitter
from where i sit in america it seems to me like the family already was abolished a long time ago. this whole thing we got going on where it's just two self-centered parents trying to groom their kids for conformity and success like they're show dogs and pushing them out the door at age 18 and leaving their own parents to die alone in some dirty derelict house or a nursing home, people value money and status and ideology more than their own flesh and blood, that's not a family. and it's not good, not having strong family ties makes people weaker, more helpless and isolated and easier to control, there's a reason why america's ruling class systematically destroyed the white family after the great depression, why they destroyed the black family after the civil rights movement, family is the most fundamental unit of social organization, you break up the family and people have nothing.
Cant afford abolishing the family in this economy
Unique IPs: 28