[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/lgbt/ - LGBT

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender +
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1778972393401.png (33.23 KB, 250x166, ClipboardImage.png)

 

The purpose of a man and a woman is for reproduction. We have special body parts that are made for that, so how is it then for two people of the same gender to be attracted together and not considered an abnormality?? It's so obvious yet the world of science simply ignores it. How is this abnormality accepted without any sort of defiance in the scientific community? Also, what's truly the percentage of people who are homosexuals (including women) only because of something wrong with them physically and not because of social trends?

>The purpose of a man and a woman is for reproduction
Religiod cope.

>Teleology right out of the gate
IGNORED

>>8650
The teleology of sex isn't solely procreation but pleasure. Just like how masturbation hasn't made the human race die out. I suspect gay genes are preserved by bisexuals which produces some variation offspring more wired for male or female attraction just as children aren't exact clones of their parents.

>>8654
I should also note that all fetuses begin as female then either remain or develop into male.

>>8654
masturbation is abnormal, duh

>>8650
It is considered an abnormality. You use the word "abnormality" when you very clearly want it to be considered a pathology.
It is not considered a pathology because it is not pathological, either to the individual, or to civilized society, or indeed to the evolutionary chances of one's broader generic group: there are several patterns (discovered because homosexuality is/was considered abnormal!) that suggest it is, in fact, desirable.
e.g. birth order effect - you're more likely to be gay the more older brothers you have, unless they're adopted - can plausibly be explained by the evolutionary trade-off in balancing "son who reproduces" against "son who provides childcare/protection/labour" etc tipping to the latter the more sons you have.
Remember, evolution works in terms of genes, not individuals.

>>8669
Homosexual behaviour is also documented in numerous non-human animal species.


Unique IPs: 7

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]