Do trans people (essentially trans women) ever feel guilty about their fetishes?
I for one dont know if I’m trans or not but I still get a weird feeling when ever I think about something that makes me horny, kind of just makes me feel like a stereotypical perverted trans woman
>>9188A little but as long as one is not a pedo or detached from reality it's forgivable. I can't speak for anyone because my fetishes aren't significantly harmful and in fact, I am generally more productive when I still have horny thoughts but.
Women generally aren't sexual beings (except for sex addiction which is a problem) but aren't asexual either; In fact, Autogynephilia specifically is found in at least 25% of cis women (doi.org/10.1080/00918360903005212) if you were curious about that specifically.
Transition worked for me and I would recommend it to most people who feel the same way but don't feel pressured one way or the other and if you do transition don't feel guilty if you're still horny.
>Women generally aren't sexual beings
You are not a Victorian.
>>9212Women are absolutely sexual beings, I dislike this rhetoric. It only causes shame and puritanism
>>9188You can jack off to whatever you want, there is no thought crime and you’re not hurting anyone. Love you OP
>>9188>stereotypical perverted trans womaneveryone likes leather MILF dominatrices, even Joe Biden
>>9223Hhhmmmm use some make up around the gray areas of your face and shave your chest, I like ur hair :3
>>9223timestamp or it's bait
>women aren't horny
enormous hairy ogre hands typed the OP
>>9231it's bait, acne like that goes away on hrt like 95% of the time
less oily skin is like a whole thing and also it rapes hormonal acne
>>9188not really guilt but i am disgusted by my extra subby & worship-related kinks because i don't think there's anyone i feel actually deserves that kind of attention
Nope lole
in my eye much of puritanism is revisionist and, even if you fully follow the doctrines it stems from, as they claim to, misses the point entirely. most of it is american for a reason. The idea that sex is fine in certain ways and bad in others, when the fine ways aren't EXCLUSIVELY for reproduction is nonsensical and fueled by outgroup neophobia more than anything else. Negative attachment to sex is still attachment to sex and therefor bad, and most puritans are 100% pro-gooner only as long as you don't do it in a "deviant" way. I'm saying this as someone who prefers to abstain from masturbation etc
I think if your thought processes involved in this are exactly as described, you've probably been taken in by braindead memes and zeitgeist that's obscuring your ability to think clearly on this. If you manage to let go of that I imagine it'll help immensely with figuring out all your questions on this stuff, including whether you're trans or not
>especially trans women
Why is there always an overfocus on trans women in transgender discourse?
>>9214Then why is loli and shota pathologized so much then?
>>9536Most of this Puritanism isn’t exclusively American.
>>9541because transmen are normal, duh
>>9543They aren’t considered normal.
They’re liked down upon as freaks due to height and having a pseudo penis.
Trans men experience more desire to de-transition than trans women.
>>9542I doubt lolisho would get as much hate as it did if it wasn’t so popular with alt righter degenerates who insist on optics nuking themselves tbh
Puritans would pathologize any kink, lolisho is just the popular thing to hate on. To be clear, I don’t feel any way about lolisho, I don’t love it or hate it. I certainly think it’s fair to criticize it in art. It’s hard to remove it from the politics of the outside world. Nothing exists in a vacuum after all.
That being said… an individual person’s sexual fantasies can’t hurt anyone (as long as it’s not real kids, obviously, but that goes without saying)
I hope this makes sense, I’m stoned rn
>>9544most likely yes, but they are normal as far as fetishes go. Which is what the post refers to.
>>9562I really don't think it's because of right wing association that people are triggered by lolisho, it's just Puritanism shit
>>9592This. I remember when lolishota was assumed to be a leftist thing back in the 2000s and early 2010s. Then as the new wave of rightism (alt right) came about and some were fans of it, anime became associated with alt right and everyone as of the 2020s now looks down on anime pfps
>>9188 80% of transfem art and community is based around esoteric fetishes.
I'm not going to let foreign influence from cisoids destroy our beautiful culture
>>9670not to diminish its influence in founding the genre but
>painfully mid petplay with psychoanalysis larp is le esotericlmao
>>9670I wish so hard that warhound was better written.
>>9188The fetish itself have more impact on the potential guilt regardless if one is born female or not.
You are not going to live with yourself the same way whether you get turned on by socks or by maiming people.
>>9212>Women generally aren't sexual beingsThey are but lots of them will deny and pretend they aren't because otherwise they will be called whores and become socially acceptable targets for harrassment.
>Autogynephilia specifically is found in at least 25% of cis womenCis Women fantasizing about becoming… women? How the fuck does that work?
>>9677>gender euphoriadid you meant dysphoria?
And if you refer to women fantasizing about being males, that would be Autoandrophilia not Autogynephilia.
No because i dont let 4chan tell me that im a sneedhon for being a sexual being like humans are supposed to be
>>9678no, i don't.
what are you even doing in a trans thread if you don't know the most basic thing about being trans?
stop bumping this r/egg_irl sharty addict thread
>>9708Can you stop projecting your autogynophilia? Straight men can have gender euphoria.
If anything, women, especially young slim women, are overused as the reference point of beauty.
Also aesthetic misandry is getting old
>>9709>makes a cute little misandrist strawman>>9713>thinks that men are rapebeasts by default for fun>>9717There are posts of men showing pics of themselves but they don’t get as much attention as those with women
Also a lot of those Instagram posts of women showing themselves aren’t the average woman. Or if they are, they used alot of food filters
And also because women are socialised to be beauty dolls.
Men who show pics of themselves are often dismissed as narcissistic or gay
Also men show pics/vids of themselves in skits a lot. Something that women don’t do a lot of.
Men do have a lot to show but I don’t expect hebegynophilics like you to understand
You’re only valuing women for their youthful looks
>>9717
Most women who post pics of themselves a lot often have low gender euphoria. There’s a lot of women who don’t post pics of themselves as well.
>>9718
This place worships women far too much to have any sincere discussions about gender relations.
They literally conure up myths about “womb envy” or whatever to paint men in a bad light.
They claim that gender and race are spooks yet they talk about killing white peoples for imperialism and encourage hatred for I do and and Japanese for “rapey tendencies”
They claim to be for LGBTQ but they often focus on trans women, ignoring trans men and cishomo males.
In fact, they often use cis homo males as a byword still while glorifying cishomo females.
They semi-jokingly promote the meme “transitioning would’ve saved them” when talking about male agoraphobes while salivating over female chuds.
They sympathize women who are young, pretty, slim and docile.
They think that older women, fat women, dykes, etc are irrelevant and don’t wanna socialize with them.
Most of these patrons on here only have experience of women from social media reels. They don’t see women much outside of that.
They think that the average woman is exactly like what they see on social media
Unique IPs: 27