No.24869
>go to siberia
>every thread is about porn, incel shit, depression, erping, avatarfagging and some weird religious zealots
Siberia is complete garbage as a board. Some threads make me question whether those people are even from /leftypol/ or just come here to shitpost. You guys let it turn into this but you're worried about some 4chan memes being posted on it. Hell, the whole website is fucking dying and you are worried about banning soyjaks and pepes. lmao.
No.24870
>>24869yea there's a good rule of thumb that when you see the people in charge shuffling around and trying to optimize totally trivial things, you're headed for disaster. Let's hope that's not true of this case
No.24872
>>24869The use of imported soys instead of actually engaging in good faith is part of that tho.
>PornThere should be a focus on providing sources and posting porn with artistic merit instead of just dumping a collection of samey looking stuff some redditor saved off of pornhub to post of 4/gif/.
>Incel shit, depressionThat's from raids I think. I know the r9k stuff is.
>ErpingI haven't seen anything serious in this regard
>avatarfaggingGet your sensitive ass back to normie boards, avatarfagging is imageboard culture.
No.24875
>>24873
I primarily mean drawn stuff since there's not much artisanship with photographic stuff.
No.24877
>>24869So what of those things should we ban according to you?
No.24880
>>24869>>24870Ban porn and incel shit and religious people and also everything mentioned in OP
No.24881
>>24878Why? It fits into the random off topic content.
>>24879I don't see why leftists can't enjoy porn.
>>24880As for 'incel shit', I think the social threads are nice, obviously some of them devolve into idpol squabbling and probably should be removed but overall I don't really see the issue. Loneliness is a big issue among the terminally-online, go figure.
Also religion isn't explicitly banned by the rules, I see no reason it should be.
No.24882
>>24862Please allow heavily modded/forked/edited versions.
Memes evolve through edits, often entirely new OC memes are inspired by old but modded memes.
You might inadvertently kill a component of the OC pipeline, otherwise.
No.24883
>>24881With that said, maybe it would be beneficial to have a general 'sex and relationships' thread that all those threads should get merged into.
>>24882I thought that chad/soy dinosaur thread was pretty funny. But overall I don't know if there is much creativity to be had with such memes. It's still just reproducing the original terrible ideology.
No.24884
>>24879
It's a handful of threads on siberia that are only sometimes active. This push to ban it feels like a glowop.
I do think a requirement to provide sauce would filter out 99% of porn anyway, leaving only the good stuff. Plus it would create pressure to not post porn industry stuff like pornhub, instead posting artists and independent sex workers.
No.24885
>>24884>It's a handful of threads on siberia that are only sometimes active. Isn't that just more of a reason to just ban it?
No.24886
>>24885What? No, just use the hide thread feature.
No.24887
>>24886Never stopped anyone from complaining about every thread ever posted.
No.24888
>>24883>With that said, maybe it would be beneficial to have a general 'sex and relationships' thread that all those threads should get merged into.I like this idea.
No.24889
>>24881>I don't see why leftists can't enjoy porn.lmao, this has nothing to do with the discussion but this reminded of a tangent I've read from the past that leftists can't enjoy shit without fighting, it's always a torrent of "There will be no cartoon/anime/porn/this or that type of music/video game/smut/this or that book, fetish or piece of media that does jack shit against or for socialism is bad and will be banned" , creating both an weird lack of lust for the socialist project for both these inside and outside wanting to join in as well as a hall monitor mentality as well as a need to be the one with the biggest moral stick, and this reason is why rightoids get so many lost people from communities like gaming, anime and TTRPG to them because while they also hate everything just like leftists they are so fragmented compared to the left that you can find an niche strand of likeminded retards that tolerate your shit without having to fight everyone because you are a fucking furry or something like that, what a weird thing to come flashing in my head.
No.24890
If you're gonna do it, just do it, instead of holding some quorum that's just gonna be shitposting
No.24899
>>24882I might add during the discussion of the proposal, we added an addendum to make exceptions for explicitly leftypol-adjacent varieties of already existing memes (such as chinletjak)
No.24900
>>24899I think what were trying to do with this proposal is to encourage original content that sets us apart from 4chan /pol/, and avoid fatigue of overly-used memes and stagnation of culture and creativity
if u wanna post a pepe, fine. but dont be generic about it i guess its what were trying to do. make your picrel interesting
No.24901
>>24900like its a sad affair that i see soyjaks more often than i see porkies nowadays
No.24909
I think it's silly but whatever.
About building or rescuing an aesthetic: it's more intelligent for each member to attach a fresh OC to each post instead of making an OC thread where none of that shit is reposted anywhere.
No.24913
Question: would the ban on Soy/wojaks, Chads, etc. not just lead us to create replacements which are different in nothing but name and basic appearance? E.G. Glegle, which is just Pepe but it's a dog (I think). Even the name is quite similar.
No.24915
Disagree. It is possible to simply adequately ban the handful of problem users IMO.
No.24916
you people are genuinely retarded.
>banning memes will create memes
no in fact the opposite is true. We used to naturally meme before you fuckwits came along.
Nobody asked for this, you have literally no idea what you are doing, there is no plan, short or long term. It is ridiculous you sat down and actually thought this up.
You are fighting a problem that does not exist on the very face it. I really have to ask what the fuck is wrong with you
No.24917
BY THE WAY, you can still post dog porn on Siberia, but this is what you chose to get rid of.
No.24919
>>24917If there were actually people a group of people trying to make dog porn a meme, we'd be talking about it.
No.24921
I feel like the pro-soy users spamming these types of memes in reaction to this move is only helping garner support for it. Like I was somewhat on the fence about this but seeing the pepejak fandom bring their worse side out of spite has only made me resent them.
No.24922
>>24913I mean, at least that would be something semi-original, but even so I think most users aren't '10 year old on deviantArt' levels of braindead.
>>24909>it's more intelligent for each member to attach a fresh OC to each post instead of making an OC thread where none of that shit is reposted anywhere.>>24909>it's more intelligent for each member to attach a fresh OC to each post instead of making an OC thread where none of that shit is reposted anywhere.Easy to say, but how do you or I encourage others?
It's not like there isn't already Oekaki along with one of the biggest booru.org boorus and 14 OC threads dedicated to sharing other OC. Even lazy people have options.
No.24923
>>24882I think originally modded memes are fine, and I agree.
There is a big difference between posting relevant memes or mods of memes, and just replicating /r9k/. It's one thing to adapt or extend, another to merely clone.
No.24933
Hello, leftypol fellows, form the east and the we st and the rest. I say, let me speak. Most of you have spken and thine self have lissen. So, no, we siberians thy fagootry have abohorren. And with multi faceted derision we have chosen, to quit plowing the fields ur honorhood have placen so exoperantly high only nobility can attainen.
In siberia, we have a name and identiyt like gays and trans, and we have thought that place is quiet good. We were broken and our problems we knowen. We lived and drived under the auspicies of metal instability, existential dread, and general brokedness.
Once in a while, some prick comes in and scorn into us that we /r9k board and schizo blow up on well intentioed threads and turn it into shit that turn awy healthy high quality posters. And our hearts are truly shaken. Your s truly is trully feeling dejection. Dual pain we fell, dual pain. We stupid and we craxy.
No, I say. We did do good threads, but dog needs a beeting only when misbehaving annd well-behaving, your hands are always fainding an excuse? What was? it? yesterday? FApping gave you carpal tunnels?
Now with we inside a petri dish under the microspce like a germ who has no loving mother or protective to save from the prying hands of the tyrants. To thee we ask, wher e do we goo awy? To 4chan or reddit-san? But /sib is our home. WE BUILT IT!!!@!! (AMBERSAND)
And if you are so incumbered by quality in general discourse why not curate content and aid it survive pumb? We call into you siberaiphobia and hated towards thiferetly thinke'd. Ur issue is not talk, it's our beloved board. U hate siberia. After all that's where th e gulals for those who are to die were.
Well, we will rise. We refuse Adam's apple from Eve. We will fight low-key purge and survve this. We will, my fellow siberia sons and ddaughter and brothers, I swear, we will raise up.
No.24934
>>24919there is literal actual dog and horseporn on siberia right now
No.24935
>>24934"actual" actual, or 3D?
No.24936
>>24934I think a 'no human x feral hentai' rule wouldn't be too controversial. We already have a no loli rule without much push back, since that can just go to /get/.
No.24958
>>24955
No one's seriously considering a porn ban, it's a joke among people opposing the soy ban. Like "well if your gonna ban this thing, you may as well ban this other thing that wouldn't make sense to be banned from a leftist forum." A slippery slope argument.
No.24967
Pornogaphy is far more deletrious to leftist politics discussion than soyjaks, and rules about spoilers should be enforced.
No.24976
>>24955
There is no reason to ban drawn porn whatsoever
No.24978
Your website sucks man. You turned it into a meme shithole where the discussion about some retard's suburban ennui outnumbers actual political discussion 100 to 1. Even now, this thread has been derailed by people arguing to ban porn somehow. Take a hint from that.
No.24980
Lol @ me getting hit by an "accidental" range ban which just happened to delete the feedback I gave on this days ago and didn't get resolved until like this morning. This is a dumb idea, and I'm not going to re-write my post… but, Sage is basically on the money. I was a bit more polite about it personally, but
>>24916 is right. We don't have the numbers, and we used to meme for fun when we did.
No.24985
To be clear I’ve not even said ban porn. Ban bestiality along with basically anything else extreme, and put the porn you absolutely must have on some nsfw board.
If you really want to make this site more appealing, you must see that many people see that shit and just leave immediately
No.24986
>>24985Hrrrm yeah we can't just rely and cater to the cohort who got accustomed and innured to dealing with anything back when /pol/ was the most visible forum and social media you could actually defend the memory of Stalin on without
immediately being banned our cohorts definitely attriting from the site for whatever life reasons
/leftypol/ isn't our cool kids tree house anymore
Lay off the fun a bit comrades
less normie scaring
No.24989
People will sperg, but I approve.
No.24992
>>24986I also think by the way, that is one of the few instances I would err in favour of silencing something. I think we should be allowed to talk about any political topic on leftypol. Particularly toxic conversations like trUUns debate can get a general that can't be bumped.
No.24993
>>24992>we should have absolute free speech>except regarding things I don't likequelle surprise
No.25012
>>24993It’s better than the mods
>we shouldn’t have free speech >apart from for stuff I do like >the stuff I like is dog porn No.25016
>>25012So that's what they meant when they said Leftypol had gone to the dogs
No.25022
>>24985No offense, Sage, I agreed with your earlier critique of the mods… but this is also stupid. We don't need to ban more stuff, and afaik actual bestiality porn already isn't allowed here. We already have a NSFW board, /siberia/ isn't the main board… and a lot of people in 2023 just aren't as big of prudes as you seem to presume wrt to porn and off-color cartoons. Like if anything the biggest prudes right now are sitting in board rooms.
No.25024
>>25022The list of things to ban is very short. I think bestiality is one of them. Just because its 2D does not change what it is. I'm assuming (I hope) we would also ban 2D CP.
People aren't prudes no. Bestiality is not a question of being a prude or not. There is no consent to be got from and animal.
Yes I eat meat, yes I am a hypocrit in this regard, fact remains of the general public 98% are absolutely oppossed to any and all forms of sexualisation of animals, and they are correct, as they are about the sexualisation of children.
Look if you really really want to draw horse porn or whatever, there are dozens, probably hundreds of other sites. It does not NEED to be here. Leftypol is unique in being a leftist political discourse board that doesn't succumb to libtardism (so the theory goes anyway) it NEEDS to exist like that. It is so way far above the prioritise of people who want to watch bestiality animation that it doesn't even register.
No.25025
>>25024I find threads about meat more offensive than ones about bestiality, since you bring it up.
No.25039
>>25025>>25036The difference is that a huge majority of people eat meat, and only a very small minority are into bestiality.
No.25046
>>25039Morality is not a "democratic" decision, jfc
No.25061
>>25046On the contrary, democracy is not a moralistic position.
No.25064
>>25061It's not a position at all it's a system of government
No.25065
>>24889having a porn thread on the funny stalin website is dumb, actually
No.25073
>>24862Which unflattering soyjak did you get portrayed as to warrant such a butthurt overreaction from a moderator?
No.25094
redpill me on lefty/pol/
No.25095
>>25094/pol/'s economics department back when /pol/ was cool stormfag and lib unfriendly
Now it's own thing as /pol/ has degenerated post it's greatest achievement of electing Trump president of the Great Satan
No.25098
>>25095interesting also cool flags btw
No.25099
>>25096Do I really have to dig through my backups to find the old /pol/ maymay of Stalin as top w/ Hitler as bottom predating the split?
No.25102
>>25099That wouldn't be enough. An archived thread would suffice.
No.25108
>>25102What kind of archived thread
There should be that embassy thread on 8/pol/ shortly after the board split where they were begging me to convince them to come back because /pol/ was less effective without the free flow of arguments between all of us
Do you know of any archives for 8/pol/ dating back to 7 or 8 years or So?
>>25101Stormfag and lib unfriendly son
This is the tankie board here we read books
No.25111
>>25108>This is the tankie board here we read booksThe tankies (AKA modern revisionists) are the most unread on this board second only to the redblack flags. Your cohort gets most of its information from RT and CGTN and couldn't give a Leninist definition of imperialism if their life depended on it.
No.25112
>>25111what's the most prominent ideology on this board? marxist-leninism or?
No.25113
>>25112how would you tell?
plus, this places is supposed to be anti-sectarian as a feature.
No.25114
>>25113i don't know its your community, i just came here from 4/pol/ and i wanted to ask a few questions about this site
No.25115
>>25114Well, what's the prominent ideology on /pol/? Classical liberals (or as they like to call themselves, libertarians)? Neo-fash? Vague conservativism? It's hard to say….
M-L and subsets are probably the most common just by numbers, but there are a lot of different other groups. Hell, we even have a few nazi regulars who preferred the discussion here over /fascist/.
No.25116
>>25115guys you konw. I just hate FUCKING UYGHURS UYGHURS UYGHURS I HATE FUCKING UYGHURS.
are leftists uyghurs?
are transhumanists uyghurs?
is free speech anti lefties?
so who is your owner?
No.25117
>>25112Various strawpolls have had ML as a plurality or slight majority over the years
These are internet strawpolls on an anonymous image board though
>>25114Officially we are indeed a non-sectarian board
The proprietary feelings MLs have is a hangover from when MLs were outcasts from other "leftist" spaces
fwiw we are currently on a queer people friendly drive to appeal to the youth demographic which may make this current state of the board not your cup of tea unless you as a /pol/itician understand that this board has a higher political purpose ie. Communism and the discussion thereof
No.25121
>>25115id wager unread nazism or racist liberalism is 4/pol/ ideology nowadays, the quality of discourse has gone downhill over the years albeit i only started lurking it specifically after /pol/ harbor
No.25129
>>25121>i only started lurking it specifically after /pol/ harborWhich happenings was that? The term's been used since at least 2014 and I suspect it's been used again since.
>the quality of discourse has gone downhill over the years Absolutely. Even on 8ch days there were nazis posting in good faith there because at least there was an understanding of systematic concepts beyond conspiratoral logic. Some basic discussion.
Even the /pol/ thread that's linking to us is filled with nonsense edgeposting. Sure, haha, it's fun to trigger da libs, but /pol/ is not Politics. It's literally saying dumb edgy stuff (back in 2012) and then getting mixed in with people silly enough to think it was unironic, then trying to rationalize it. So anyone seeking actual political discussion won't like the place.
No.25130
This is not a bad decision.
Don't listen to the soyjak.party raiders.
No.25132
>>25129 (me)
shitty example, but stuff like this was common even in 2016, let alone post-NLP and post-2020.
THIS ELECTION YEAR IS GONNA SUCK FOR EVERY BOARD ON 4CHAN. At least here the low-quality garbage looks out of place, places like /pol/ and /v/ have no chance.
No.25133
>>24862As much as I disagree with the wojack/pepe ban, I think if we're going to move forward with this ban at the very least we should have a trade for it.
For banning wojak and pepe, you should ban as well:
anti-porn posters,
anti-lgbt posters,
and virtue signalers.
And you can't even counter me on this take. Look at these posts:
>>24869>>24870>>24880>>24873>>24879>>24878Nothing of value.
It would take a million years of their posting to offer the level of value one frog post.
They just want to ban everything to make the site a static mush of thought to reflect the puddle in their head that was once a brain – a puddle that has gone stagnate for so long that it has become a hot spot for the most filthy maggots.
No.25134
>>251292014 after mootykins was called luggage lad for vacationing with a girl who had a bf he made a site wide banner inviting anyone to raid /pol/ in response then sticked the 8 steps of cuckolding and played some music board wide which i don't remember because phoneposter. also big agree i almost exclusively use /pol/ nowadays for offtopic posting about food or guns and i don't think a single person in my irl WN group uses any chana for discussion these days
No.25136
>>25133>And you can't even counter me on this takestopped reading
No.25138
>>25137>"based"Existed long before /pol/.
>seethe" and "cope"Meaningless anti-brain cliches. I agree with your proposal.
No.25140
>>25133>alrighty time to ban moarNah
Time to undo these gay meme-bans.
No.25141
Nazi here. This isn't my board, but I can't sit by and just watch you do this without saying something. What exactly does this achieve? I get it, Nazis live rent-free in communist heads, and communism lives rent-free in Conservitard heads. It's irritating, it's pointless, but I don't see how this achieves anything. I like the protectionist angle, I like the almost state-like desire to act upon an issue, but I still don't see the fixing, improving or solving an issue you people have. Even this policy shows you have an obsession with /pol/. The site is called /leftypol/. It exists because we live rent-free in your head.
The problem fundamentally, is that your worldview is dying. Revleft is gone, this board split apart, you're all blackpilled. You're understimulated intellectuals, and there's less of you. Creativity isn't something you generally have as a bookworm. This policy just seems desperate and would just lead to people posting less images. Maybe it will work, I hope it does for you, but it just seeems desperate.
I can't believe this is Marxism in the 21st century.: "We need to ban memes for being too fash"
The rail workers just got fucked, the 'socialist' controlled opposition democrats voted on fucking them and preventing them from striking, we're all living in shit, our wages are worse than ever, all our labor is spent on some shitty war, the rest is given to wall street, we're sending tanks to prolong a bloodbath, and what is left of Marxism is debating on whether to ban some stale fucking memes.
Please get your shit together.
No.25142
idk but if it makes the nazi mad im all for it
No.25143
>>25141I don't think they do this because they are leftists, it's just that wojak and pepe are kinda stale.
No.25144
>>25143So why did the OP call them "reactionary" memes?
No.25145
>>25141>What exactly does this achieve?You know how American boring generic industrialized-culture made your country's own arts and media worse?
Same shit, basically. And it's not even a /pol/ meme, so idk where that shit's coming from.
>This isn't my board, but I can't sit by and just watch you do this without saying something.>I can't believe this is Marxism in the 21st centurylol get a life you loser. it's the internet.
seriously, is this meant to be owning da gommies? showing that we live rent-free in your head by coming here and writing a gay little mini-essay? im screencapping this, shit's more hilarious than any soyjak or pepe comic,
No.25146
>>25144Reactionary doesn't mean 'right wing', you dummy. They're anti-progress.
No.25147
>>25145>And it's not even a /pol/ meme, so idk where that shit's coming from.The literal OP of this thread?
>>25146Same difference, retard.
No.25149
>>25143Yeah, and I don't think it will change anything. Creativity on issues that matter? None, but watch them make 52 images of pixelated perfection regarding images of their favorite catgirl getting fucked. It's incels. Sex-starved incels that haven't seen or smelt grass in months.
>>25145>lol get a life you loser. it's the internet.It's politics. It's last vestiges of revolt against an immoral system crippling and crushing everything around us. I tend to think issues that matter are more important than whether memes are stale or not.
>seriously, is this meant to be owning da gommies? I'm well past the point of seeing Marxism as a threat. It's just a boogeyman, a dead politic, and this thread is proof. It's frankly depressing, because it means that Market Liberal Capitalism has even less opposition.
>showing that we live rent-free in your headAs usual, the spiteful nature of the freak reveals itself. It's the same on /pol/. So many spiteful snarky people without power visciously attacking others to feel the power they lack.
>im screencapping thisThat's all this is to you. Some overly dramatic squabble and gotcha moment.
Nothing is more blackpilling that interacting with the average spiteful midwit regardless of their politic. It's the same words, the same malice, the same tribalistic jingoistic red team vs blue team bullshit.
It's not my board, it's not my politic, but it's also not in our interests to watch it rot either. I'm a Nazi, I'm a Socialist, and I'd rather there be more of us collectively, than less.
No.25150
>>25141>>25149Alright, this spergout vindicates the banning of pepe. How about we further remove the filth of 4chan and ban porn & neet/incel/my life is so sad threads?
No.25152
>>25142>idk but if it makes the nazi mad im all for itJust like a conservitard that wants to see shitlib tears. Zero independent thought or revolutionary spirit. All that matters is 'making the other team mad'.
No.25154
>>25151>no rebuttal>no argument>just snarkIt's like I'm on /pol/ arguing with a conservitard. Is there a factory where they create you spiteful mutants?
No.25155
Somehow this place manages to be more cucked than /pol/
No.25156
>>25150"Policy should be based entirely on whether my make-believe opposition agrees with it"
If I didn't fly a swastika, your opinion would be entirely different. You have no independent position based upon any worldview. You are the reactionary you claim to oppose.
No.25158
>>25152Making 👻 >the other team 👻 mad doesn't matter. It's merely the only function you're providing.
You wrote 500 words and it's all the same unproductive drivel you claim to be above. Baseless claims that contradict evidence on issues you have no experience with. Petty insults. Taking the internet too seriously. You provided us nothing but laughter.
No.25160
>>25156No, I'd react the same if you said you were an M-L or ancom. Your post makes it obvious you have no idea what this place is.
The fact that you think this rule has anything to do with /pol/, or even that you imply this place split from /pol/, is enough for me to recognize you as being totally unfamiliar with us, our history and our situation.
No.25161
>>25158>maybe if we ban these shit memes then better things will magically appearMeanwhile, all that creativity is on Siberia making porn about catgirls.
The problem isn't the old memes. The problem is your board is filled with incels and spiteful mutants like you. I'm not saying /ol/ is any better either.
>Taking the internet too seriously. Says the person whose politic is discussing banning mems. Fuck me, the projection is too much.
Yes, I take politics seriously. I know 90% of you don't, which is why we live in shit.
No.25163
25160
>Your post makes it obvious you have no idea what this place is.
It's a dead hugbox.
>The fact that you think this rule has anything to do with /pol/,
/pol was directly mentioned as one of the reasons.
>or even that you imply this place split from /pol/
It is. It was first created on 8chan
>is enough for me to recognize you as being totally unfamiliar with us, our history and our situation.
I posted on /leftypol/ when it was first reated on 8chan. I'm a /new/sman.
No.25165
>>25161>maybe if we ban these shit memes then better things will magically appearwell they did rapidly appear (this rule has been in place for weeks now) and it probably wasnt magic
stopped reading
No.25167
>>25166LEMME AT 'EM!
LEMME AT 'EM!
No.25168
>>25165>well they did rapidly appearGot any examples?
No.25169
>>25163>I posted on /leftypol/ when it was first reated on 8chan. If that were true, the fact that you thought it was created in reaction to /pol/ is astounding. The name was taken because the exodus was of 'leftist' users being banned, but it wasn't from any of the /pol/ boards.
No.25171
>>25169Actually 8/pol/ was banning leftist poster's and 4/pol/ tended to go downhill in that respect over the years and that's why all the come back plz begging on the embassy thread was irrelevantY yes of course /leftypol/ is in fact a /lit/ descendent board don't let anybody tell you otherwise newfags
No.25173
>25170
>says yes
>doesn't post them
>25169
>you thought it was created in reaction to /pol/ is astounding
Yes,the lMarxists left the board and created their own.
>the exodus was of 'leftist' users being banned
I don't remember that complaint ever being made on 8chan. The main complaint was the 'stormfags had taken over the board'. Can't lie. We did.
No.25175
>>25174why'd you dox me bro
No.25178
>>25176You said the policy had a rapid impact. I want to see examples of this impact. Post examples of this fresh creativity.
No.25179
>>25178>I want to see examples of this impact.I don't care what you want.
No.25181
>25173
Well you see lad I moseyed over to /leftypol/ after the embassy thread and mentioned yoise wanted them back and called them chickens and they said they couldn't they'd been banned
No.25184
>>25183The future starts with you and me.
No.25185
>>25183Nazbol is banned in the rules
No.25186
>>25185That was due to overproduction it was getting to the point of a flood
We have the opposite problem now
No.25187
>>25185this place is a pathetic hugbox
No.25188
>>25187No you retarted jewish nigger we are extremely PR focussed for simple little reason like wanting to take power
No.25189
>>25186No it's because it is a third position fascist ideology. Strasserism was banned too
No.25190
I think the vols are grown up enough to handle nuance now
How's The PTSD from the job sorry
No.25191
>>25188this place has zero cultural impact and stands no chance of doing anything except coddle fags
No.25194
>>25191Hehe yeah
Except when it kicks into gear
Then it gets fun
No.25196
>>25193if i answered that question i'd get gulaged
oh no no no no
No.25197
>>25195Want our help with Trump 2024 or should we continue with our planned Harris Santos cage fight foar teh lulz?
No.25198
>>25185>Nazbol is banned in the rulesLiterally isn't.
No.25199
>>25197I wasn't following. Which zionist do you support again?
No.25200
>>25196>if i answered that question i'd get gulagedIt's ok anon, the kind Mr. Ulyanov would have shot everyone here.
No.25202
>>25198Some mods interpreted it that way which was annoying once the flood stoppedHey some nerd out there if you can be fucked hook up stable diffusion and flood /pol/ with Nazbol memes
No.25203
>>25195>d*scord screencapdidn't click. might as well be twitter shit
No.25204
>>25202>rebuild the neonazi->nazbol->bol pipelineoh no
no no no
youll doom us all
No.25205
>>25199They're all fucking Zionists that's the
point and what makes it so funny
No.25206
>>25199this is lebbybol so i suprort beer sanders
No.25207
>>25202FULLY AUTOMATED DEEP-FRIED NAZBOL GANG
No.25209
>>25208If it contains boring recycled trash like "the", "is", "very" and "yes", then I will immediately plug this into a ban filter.
No.25213
>>25152except i would not care about a nazi trying to concern troll their way into being taken seriously
>>25154are you mad you cant handle smug banter
kill yourself honestly
No.25218
>>25217They weren't even fascist, they were just boring cancers that stiffed growth.
You know, now that the dust has settled and /b/ is no longer a top 5 board on 4chan, I feel we're in a good position to truly uncover what the cancer that killed /b/ was. And if you said rage comics, well you're closer than damn mudkips and ponies.
No.25219
>>25148<two 300+ reply threadsScratch stale memes and a fascist bleeds.
No.25220
>>25217did u made this lmao
No.25221
>>25218/b/ could still be good but the mods just delete random posts and theres so many threads you have to hide. And /bant/ sucks pretty bad
No.25222
>>25220comrade based marxist matey made it
No.25223
>>25220it was made by a troll back when we were still on 8chan
the mods banned him for being annoying and he never came back lmao
No.25224
>reddit frog is…. LE HECKIN FASCISM!
No.25225
>>25221>the mods just delete random postszomg!1
So nothing changed from day 1. Do they at least memeban and make it fun or is it just deleting shit they don't like?
>>25224lol no-one thinks that. if anything, it's 'i have no gf'.
No.25226
>>25225>Do they at least memeban and make it fun or is it just deleting shit they don't like?no they never do anything entertaining. They just delete it
No.25227
>>25217>Pepe and SpurdoMooooooodssss
No.25230
>>25223I don't think he was a troll, I think he was bullied unfairly by the board, he made a cool OC, who cares if it was 'cringe'.
No.25231
>>25227Spurdo isn't a pepejak. This isn't a "ban all old memes" rule.
No.25232
>>25231He's a 4chan meme….. 4chan memes are banned. MoooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDSSSSSSSSSssssss
No.25236
>>25223weird…. i dont think the drawing is on the booru. should i add it?
No.25242
>>25241Wypipo be crazy man
No.25247
>>25241>right wingers refuse to go to the doctors and deal with their feelings by beating on their loved oneswow tell me something I don't know
No.25262
Have the denizens of leftypol really become so overstimulated and thin-skinned that they can't handle seeing shitty memes and mean words every once in a while?
Leftypol was once the ONLY left-wing forum with relatively lax censorship. Please don't let it become like every other over-moderated wasteland on the internet.
No.25263
>>25262lmao, why are you so invested in pepes you nerd
No.25264
>>25263That clearly wasn't my point you fucking asshole. If I have a choice between banning something or not banning something, if it isn't illegal or actively disruptive then I choose the latter.
Honestly, I don't see why the moderation on this site doesn't simply go ahead and ban whatever they dislike without any further process or discussion involved. It would be much more honest.
No.25265
>>25264would it blow your mind to learn thats exactly how this place works?
it is literally ran by people who will ban you if they post stuff you dont like, it is there website
No.25266
>>25265*if you post stuff they dont like
No.25267
>>25264i think it is disruptive having stupid pepes and wojaks everywhere, it lowers the discourse, makes this place more like 4chan. hopefully the janoids will ban porn next. free speech isn't a good in itself, look at 4chan or look at places that have 100% no moderation.
No.25269
>>25265>would it blow your mind to learn thats exactly how this place works?Except theres a veneer of transparency and process and principles all created to legitimize it. It's dishonest as fuck, what about this do you not understand?
>>25267>i think it is disruptive having stupid pepes and wojaks everywhere, it lowers the discourseNo, it does not. The discourse will stay low no matter which funny reddit images are or aren't allowed.
>makes this place more like 4chanIt's a fucking imageboard, what did you expect?>look at 4chan or look at places that have 100% no moderation.<100% no moderationThis is a fucking fantasy.
Moreover, making a connection between a supposed lack of moderation to the reason why 4chan has shit culture is bullshit.
4chan has shit culture because of its history and its purpose. The same can be said about leftypol.
All that moderation does is either stop disruption or stifle discussion, nothing more.
No.25270
>>25269what do you think the rules are
No.25271
>>25270I think the rules are whatever the fuck the moderators abritrarily want at any point in time.
But the moderators would probably say that these are the rules:
https://leftypol.org/rules.htmlhttps://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/742065.htmlThey also used to make threads where they pretended to discuss the rules, thankfully that useless formality was abolished, until recently with this thread.
No.25274
>>25271not your website if you dont like it fuck off
No.25275
>>25274I can criticize whoever the fuck I want.
No.25276
>>25275you can but it doesnt mean anyone has to care either
No.25277
>>25276What's your point?
No.25279
>>25276i don't care that you don't care fagola you're the one replying lmao
No.25281
>>25280You're kidding right? Soyjaks are literally one of the most ultra reactionary meme's in existence.
It's not impossible that a single soyjak meme could prevent an entire communist revolution in some country somewhere, if it received enough attention.
No.25283
reminder that banning soyface and memes despite the fact these are ubiquitous over the internet out of some vague sense of righteousness and signalling is exactly the same as a reddit forum banning catgirls
No.25286
>>25284uygha anyone can read a book, congratulations you can literally do something anyone can do. Most of you people don’t even read theory you just skim Wikipedia and twitter for cherry-picked shit that backs up your belief
No.25287
>>25286>anyone can do itBut are you doing it tho
I don't know who you think I am but seems you are mad
Good stay mad
No.25288
Jewish nigger
No.25289
>>25287you’re not reading anything but the anon’s post
No.25292
>>25286Stimulus: The suggestion to read theory, because the post they responded to was being social media brained and it's author could use a theoretical basis to build off of.
Response: Chastising them for suggesting such a thing. Belittling the efforts of those who have done it, despite lack of implication that it's meant to be some impressive feat. Projection over methods of avoiding accomplishing said feat.
No.25293
Ban Graceposting too, it's literally just the same dozen images being reposted over and over.
No.25294
>>25293That can be solved with more grace art tho. Grace poster does lean toward commissioning mostly reaction images because they're commissioning them and feel like they need images with utility. I think if they weren't the main anon in charge of grace image making they'd use / commission a wider pallet and not just post reaction images. We could also perhaps encourage them to make a Neocities because I think that would be fun and bring traffic here from people curious about Alunya.
Also avatarfrens are normal on non-4chan Imageboards, you could just hide the royal colony thread, and Grace and Alunya are important for each other's enrichment and habitat.
No.25295
>>25294Hiding threads is stupid, why should I have to go out of my way to prevent myself from looking at something I don’t want to look at, especially when she often leaves her thread and tries to spam other threads with her shitty royalist bullshit drawings
No.25296
>>25295All from /pol/ mind you, but nobody has a problem with that
No.25297
>>25295lol the free screech crowd has no solidarity with anyone
I wrote somewhere reactionaries work against their own interest constantly and inadvertently.
And all the time I am reminded how correct I am
No.25298
>>25295It's a single button for the royal colony thread and also she doesn't post that much outside of it, and when she does it's usually just to gush over Grace x Alunya shipping. Also you can hide her posts with a uBlock filter using psudo-classes and the file names for the more common reaction / dog images she posts. Perhaps I only see this as a negligible task because Linux brainworms though.
No.25300
>>25298>>25297I was being sarcastic uygha, shouldn’t the whole “I shouldn’t have to go out of my way to look at something I don’t wanna look at” be enough of a give away ?
No.25301
>>25299
Eh, gently encourage her to read more into MonSoc. Which takes looking into it yourself and having some idea what she's read so far. Encouraging her to make a Neocities blog would remedy this.
No.25302
>>25300>“I shouldn’t have to go out of my way to look at something I don’t wanna look at"I mean I just assumed that was a random neuronal misfire and ignored it to be perfectly honest
No.25303
>>25300Ah okie 👍 Just woke up.
No.25304
>>25302You may wish to give your fellow man the benefit of the doubt, you’ll end up taking everything way too seriously if you don’t
No.25308
>>25295>>25298>>25301>she>herHoly shit, you retards
No.25309
>>25304>You may wish to give your fellow man the benefit of the doubtnah
No.25310
>>25293You see ackchyually it's ironic! The mods give a literal monarchist his own general because its ironic. The mods ban avatarfagging but ignore this case because its ironic.
No.25311
I think you got it wrong, frogs, wojaks and all should be banned everywhere BUT siberia
No.25312
>>25310>The mods ban avatarfaggingsince when
No.25314
>>25312Do you remember that weird time when a group of people started avatarfagging all over /siberia/? They banned it around that time. 2021, I think.
No.25316
>>25314They clearly stopped doing that. Penny, Chihuahua, Jenny, ect… all use avatars with no issue.
No.25317
>>25308This is an anonymous board. they post using a feminine board-tan as an avatar. We can only guess based on vibes.
No.25318
>>25316Ah. You never know when bans/rules may or may not apply here.
No.25322
>>25318I mean I feel for you. Being dumb as a bag of hammers must be hard.
No.25329
>>25322>noooo mods don't say one thing and do another you're just le dumb!Pathetic cope.
No.25386
>>25367is there an archive somewhere with these? i love them especially the classical art ones
No.25390
comrades, it has come to my attention that you have taken steps to further your aim to become a creative powerhouse, i commend you for this but i suggest that we as a community do not forbid soyjaks from existing, for the soyjak is a widely known, powerfool propaganda tool and as such must be employed by us to become even more relevant in the netsphere, i thank you for your time and may the marxism be with you.
No.25479
Quality of this thread is a good reminder that leftypol really went downhill. But I'm not exactly sure what if anything the moderation team can do. It seems the wrong kind of posters took over and that's it. Any online community goes downhill when it gets taken over by people who have no respect for the original culture.
In retrospect leftypol was functionally a place for left-leaning autists to discuss and debate politics, philosophy and history. It never aligned with the purported goal of radicalizing normies; normies don't post on imageboards in the first place. The gradual "censorship" (for lack of a better term) however is not what killed leftypol, I maintain that it's the newfags (and the splits but that one doesn't even seem worth mentioning). It may just be too late/impossible to bring the old leftypol back.
No.25489
>>25479no offense but things (and people) change uygha, why do you think anyone can ever bring back something old? The old lived in a different time. Something created for one purposes transforms and eventually stops serving that purpose. What stunted your development?
No.25498
So did mods pass this stupid rule or not?
No.25581
>>25389>"communist" defends private propertymany such cases
No.26354
>>25498They seem to be enforcing a frog ban inconsistently. This post (me) had the image removed with the stated reason of "frogposting":
https://leftypol.org/siberia/res/391347.html#q391704Yet there are three other frogs in that thread uncensored (one of which I also posted). I don't know why, I see no significant difference in terms of originality (neither frog I posted was OP). I was surprised that they took the time to remove the frog but not the time to direct me to this thread or some other resource indicating the ban was real, not sure what those priorities indicate. I thought the whole concept of banning frogs was probably just somebody making up drama until the mods actually removed a frog (but only one for some reason that I still don't understand). I would've imagined that a change like this would be reflected in the rules page or at least a sticky thread in meta. I don't even care about frogs, but a rule change like this seems like it belongs on the rule page. I'm still confused about what contexts the frog is banned in, because as far as I know nobody has said. I'm not running the place though, I just post here sometimes.
No.26356
>>26354Look, no offense but do you have autism? Don't try to understand what the mod team is doing. Most of it will not make sense.
Unique IPs: 95