Hey Guy, op here.
I forgot to look at my thread until a week after, (work, job fair, JoJo part 8 "Wonder of You" addictive arc, job search, new 9in vibrator, etc.)
And now I'm replying since I can't stop myself from procrastinating.
My reaction to my actions: youtuber farfa, smiling really smugly.
I can't find an image of the face exactly, (he'd do it on vids 2 years ago), so just imagine the first two images related merged into one.>>30294>You can hide the thread/post or simply not visit the NSFW boards
That's why we should do a flair system of threads being auto hidden if nsfw.
We should get people to post in board even if at work, get back at the boss.>>30306
No, I can talk about politics more.
In fact one time I got shushed at a wendys since I got so over worked about car dependent cities that I yelled.>>30309
I find that contentious.
Not even interested in unbanning it, unlike what >>30348
Physical cp has a connection to child sexual assult, the drawings do not – they just aren't comparable.
It's kinda like how some argue that blacks can't be racist since they don't have systematic power – though I don't like their argument since blacks clearly support white suppremecy with their racism with cutting off recources or allys that could help them, or just literally doing racist stuff againts black people like black teachers punishing black children more despite being as disruptive as their white peers.
To focus on: >>30348
This is why I argue they should be ban.
They don't engage in good faith, if they did, then they'd know I don't want to unban the images.
One eye and out the other.
The latter post though makes an incoherent argument atleast.>It's like saying planning a murder but not carrying out is fine because there are actual murders… one thing being worse doesn't make another good suddenly.
People literally do it all the time as a joke, relieve stress, or even just as a mental exercise.
Women do it literally all the time, but then flip the plan on them, and hence uphold the, "Cult of Terror". Or people in general who consume alot of csi or true crime podcasts.
Also: murders, and crime in general, don't just spontaneously occur, there's a reason – planning a murder has reason behind it, but that won't just lead people in comitting a murder. >>30396>>It is>Laws on illustrated CP says you're wrong.
The law of having that content is uneven and all over the place.
In Canada for example: someone had simpsons porn of Lisa and got arrested since, while having the content in America (most states) and Canada is legal, to cross to Canada with it is not.I don't remember if I learned that from 8chan or cumtown
><Nitpicking the example while ignoring the point>just because one thing is a greater crime
What you compared wasn't even a crime.
You example is like going: >just because flipping off a baby is less worse than kicking it doesn't mean the first is good<as a response to someone liking a drawing to a dog eating chocolate and why ergo it should be banned since you want to ban images of animal abuse.
>Pedophile mental gymnastics and projection
You can't even grasp any material basis in your analysis, just idealism and smug.
You're either an ally of pedophilia like that of Chris Hansen, or a pedophile in training – this is the objective facts we're working with.
Perfect example of why these people should get a day ban.
Either that example, or this: >>30399
Third image related.
Just for you; took me 20s of googling.>>30404
This person's argument is incomplete: >>30408
The site can ban loli all they want, and that's good.
Freedom of speech is to be able to make sites no matter what, not have people tolerate you on any site you go on – (GOD I FUCKING WISH 2012 4CHAN UNDERSTOOD THAT AND FUCKING BANNED STORMFRONT USERS)
The issue is country bans, which is a different topic, which you can figure I'd be against banning that stuff unless it had a connection to child sexual assult like physical cp.