ban ai images/videos in threads unless the OP explicitly asks for ai content
nobody likes it and the only reason anyone ever posts it is to trigger people and dilute the quality of the content here. in politics in particular the only reason why right-wingers use it so much is because their objective isn't to make something good, but to annoy the libs - that's the entire meme
>>40249how are we supposed to tell if somethings AI
>>40249banning is not the answer and won't accomplish anything, instead whenever you see ai generated content, call the poster a faggot and threaten to rape them.
>>40249This is first post I've seen of anyone complaining about AI
>>40252I agree with OP so add +1 IP to your mental vote count
>>40250By not having long covid and requiring sources.
>>40250>ai images/videosdid you even read the post?
or are you implying you can't tell if an image is ai?
and even if you can't always tell, it is not like the mod team has 100% accuracy on anything else, so why would you ask for 100% accuracy on this issue
>>40322> more AI sloppa to piss off anti-AI postersbased poster lol
>>40322taking screenshots of all the AI generated titties and reposting them to own the person who made the posts
Wow. I never imagined that LeftyPol would such snowflakes over harmless art media
>>40355This is a recurring sentiment though.
If it is only just a couple anons, they have too much free time
>>40345If you would read the screenshots, they show an example of OP's point ringing true: AI images being used by a debate addict to shit up a thread intended for drawings.
>>40373Coom, but not first and foremost. You've highlighted something there: this making it difficult to have threads about erotic art because people want to just use it as a coom thread.
>>40360Is it though? It's basically two anons being for the ban in this thread alone
ban ai slop. especially screenshots of ai prompts as sources for shit.
why are you guys talking about "ban" as if the idea was to ban all AI content
the compromise proposed is rather simple: no AI in a thread unless the OP explicitly asks for it. why argue in such bad faith
>>40377OP made those the first 3 words. I think the mods should rework the wording so as to prevent people with bad reading comprehension from thinking that's what it's about.
>>40380Most people have bad reading comprehension, believe it or not. It's not even a matter of lack of education.
Why are you guys so pissy about everything?
AI is just another form of graphics.
You guys allow any other form of crap but you think non-wojk images made by AI is the final straw?
How are you guys any different from
4chan and Reddit?
>>40399my complaints and demands for censorship are solid, I don't care if it hurts your feelings
>>40401You're the one with hurt feelings is some pixels offend you so much
>>40408You seem obsessed with the idea of offending some strawman in your head. No one's offended, you're just being a nussance by posting that which there are venues for into the venues of other things with no overlap.
>>40411So you're offended in other words
no but really, at the very least AI slop as a source for anything should be bannable
>>40518More like Gen Y moment
Unique IPs: 20