I don't know a few days ago or something a Jeet made a post asking about his opinions for Muslims, possibly in the light of what happened in Curryland, and his story about his grandfather being in the Indian Air Force during the Bangladeshi Genocide really resonated with me.
I too lost my father in Chechen War and have been raised by my mother alone. Interestingly speaking, that discussion got deleted by the Jannies. Keeping that in mind, why don't we label this board as /leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Correct.
I don't think that you all understand even one bit what Islam is like and quite frankly what Muslims are like, I know and have read detailed surveys from reputed websites about Muslims and their views, and they are by far the most violent set of people on this planet.
I unironically understand what that doomer Jeet was on about, they have already destroyed multiple civilisations and they will never have an enlightenment like Christianity did. How long are we going to tolerate them? Given that they use us as a tool because they believe that since we speak against Imperialism and Colonisation. And occasionally against our own countries so they side with us to weaken our own civilisations.
The slavic birth rates are hopeless in the Federation and the "people" from Caucasus and Central Asia are multiplying at the rates rivalling rabbits.
I will leave this website soon enough, not that anyone will ever miss me, but I just want to let you know, your unwillingness to see Islam's reality is what is causing people to vote right wing, even though the right wing is retarded and is only concerned about filling up the pockets of a few on top.
>>41147>"politically correct" was at the time just a sneer word analougous to "woke,"Also, ironically, the term has origins in communist discourse and then got revived in an analogous way to "woke" (like people who go out of their way to avoid causing offense). But in communist parlance in the 1920s you might have heard someone talk about the "politically correct decision" or being consistent with the general line of the party or something like that (or so I've read). Of course you'll also see rightoids say "political correctness came from the Soviet Union!" Well yeah, but it meant something different than that you morons.
It's cultural appropriation, dammit.
>>41149>Well yeah, but it meant something different than that you morons.Same as when they say “the Democrats were the party of the KKK!”
They were. That was over 150 years ago and the parties were different.
(not that I like Democrats, modern or 19th century version, btw, just pointing to another example of chuds being willfully retarded)
>>41152>Marxism is not politically incorrect anywhere, no country has laws to suppress the speech of leftistThe laws being used to deport people on the US right now were meant to target Marxists. Specifically, the deportation and attempted deportation of Mahmoud Khalil was based on the Inmigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which states "Any immigrant who is or has been a member of or affiliated with the Communist or any other totalitarian party (or subdivision or affiliate thereof), domestic or foreign, is inadmissible."
And the whole line that only the left is against free speech is laughable in the face of the reaction to Palestine protests.
>>41146idpol? in my leftypol?
Are Muslim workers not still workers?
Their religion/civilization, even assuming it is as backwards as you claim it is, is of no significant concern outside of its influence on the establishment of class consciousness.