Is there a way we could have a rule against "look at this living straw-man" type posts? Like a rule where if someone just brings a tweet / journalist article / other whatother rando to rile users up as that type of guy they're exampling as b

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1781329800544.jpg (286.58 KB, 2048x1178, tumblr_6ac762417c82b1ca960….jpg)

Anonymous 13-06-26 05:50:00 No.45397

Is there a way we could have a rule against "look at this living straw-man" type posts? Like a rule where if someone just brings a tweet / journalist article / other whatother rando to rile users up as that type of guy they're exampling as being significant somehow, that the thread can just be zapped? >>>/leftypol/2838312 being a particularly blatant example of the effort-to-trollage ratio this tactic yields.

Most 14f breaking post and idpol tends to follow this format anyway, so when those are not themselves grounds enough for some reason, this seems like a reasonable measure against over-lenience on those fronts.

Anonymous 24-06-26 00:32:56 No.45498

~~>>>/siberia/798373~~
New example, bump

Anonymous 24-06-26 21:15:04 No.45509

also ban all "why are X like this?" posts

Anonymous 29-06-26 07:00:03 No.45557

>>>/siberia/800503

Glownonymous 29-06-26 07:02:28 No.45558

if its real then its clearly not a strawman lol

Anonymous 29-06-26 07:16:44 No.45559

>>45558
>Trying to extrapolate a small sample of data points from algorithmic social media posts or search engine bait, where there is an incentive to gear one's life around making "content" and "maximizing SEO," making even earnest cases illegitimate in context.

new leftypol ban list Glownonymous 29-06-26 07:59:41 No.45560

File: 1782719980936-6.png (188.04 KB, 600x600, reddit_logo.png)

>>45509
>why are X like this?
>what is the materialist explanation for X?
>was X autistic?
>debunk this
>>greentext thread
>who was in the right here?
>the absolute state of X
>trvthnvke
>what does /X/ think of Y?
>unironically
>is X praxis?
>consumersisters…
>what did they mean by this?
>X pilled
>new X just dropped
>>twitter screencap thread
>why do X hate Y?
>(chat) is this true?
>reminder
>the X that Y the Z
>inb4
>would transitioning have saved her?
>X is a meme
>based
>it's over for X
>bump
>X general
>OP is a jewish nigger faggot transhumanist Epstein
>post X each time you visit
>ITT
>X won
>>i look like this and i say this
>which way X person?
>sage
>imagine the smell
>>containment thread

Anonymous 29-06-26 20:13:33 No.45562

File: 1782764012923-6.jpeg (76.78 KB, 500x500, IMG_2979.jpeg)

>>45560

Anonymous 03-07-26 01:30:18 No.45570

File: 1783042218457-8.png (339.44 KB, 506x493, stalin reddit is down the ….png)

>>45559
Still not a strawman

>>45498
>>45557
>Noooo why are people shitposting on the shitposting board!!!
It's literally the /b/ board you nimrod. It's like going to /pol/ and being surprised to find nazis or going to reddit and being surprised that liberals are there.

>>45397
>ITT OP is mad about being called out, so they whine to the mods instead of arguing a point or ignoring bait.
Disgusting redditoid behaviour.

>idpol tends to follow this format
That isn't idpol and you're a hypocrite when there's literally constant "muh ML/tankie suck" threads or "muh zigger" posters constantly regurgitating recycled Nazi talking points. Either uphold the rules equally or fuck off.

Unique IPs: 6