BPD edition
Lets discuss women with borderline personality disorder and also whether or not incels are just men with undiagnosed BPD. Is BPD the reason for the male loneliness epidemic? Are men with BPD more violent than women with BPD?
>>689676why am i so easy to turn depressed?
read this new doujin uploaded yesterday on my birthday, got sad a girl with a missing limb from sepsis found love and i didn't in real life
https://eahentai.com/a/53504>>692889A woman can lose all limbs and find at least one guy who loves her unconditionally
On the other hand while men have harder times to mate those who do can get away with mistreating their partners much more than the average woman
It ees what it ees
>>692870Have you heard of Tim Rogers, a guy who used to work for Kotaku and now make 6 hours long video reviews of old games?
He is very good at what he does and truly impassionated, but he also has BPD, it becomes obvious when he talks about his personal life.
millenials have finally become completely out of touch, the same way boomer are
recently been invited to discuss something in person by some late-30-something upperclassman from my uni at a public bar (out of all places), yet another one of those out-of-fashion millenial institutions ("had" to mention the obvious, that I wasn't comfortable around noisy crowds for him to even pick a seemingly decent one), and when this painfully cute waitress around my age came around to ask me what I wanted to drink (imagine picking anything else besides tap water) and blurted out something nearly incomprehensible, this guy simply couldn't take the hint and started giving me impromptu "dating advice" by mentioning out of the blue that if he were me (possibly implying of "relevant" age, as if it mattered), _he_ would've given her some tongue-in-cheek compliment to break the ice or something
I didn't elaborate further on this already asinine conversation, since he seemingly didn't catch the memo that college-aged women had virtually all turned into either haughty ice-queens who'd visibly scoff had you even dared glance in their general direction or obnoxious autistic "feminist" femcels who made it their life struggle to harass and ruin your life had you ever came to hurt their fragile ego by standing anywhere close to them
but yeah, thanks for the advice, wished I had been alive 30 years ago so I could school everyone around me sounding as smug as clueless to anyone but myself
>>692974i hate these
>>693003i love these
>>692917I never thought that "all" women use the Tea App, theres a certain type of woman that does. When you touch grass even as little as I do, you find this out.
>>692923But they're fun! Chihuahua always posts in them and people say hi to each other.
>>692984I only find it gross when they're trying to make a statement with their tattoos like a full body paint of edgy tattoos. Most women have at least one nowadays anyway.
>>693117Age gap relationships where one person is a teenager are bad
>>693120>Age gap relationships where one person is a teenager are badIf you include 18-19 as teen when referring to age gap relationships then you're wrong.
Also,
>>693122This. Age "gap" relationships are morally obsessed over as "power imbalance" meanwhile, financial gap or knowledge gap is excused.
We need to rethink our current perceived crisis over male loneliness, much of it stems from unrealistic, often misogynistic, often entitled, worldviews. Young men are frequently exposed to ideologies that frame intimacy as something all men are entitled to, and portray women as beings who should be controlled and forced into monogamy, yet, this distortion contradicts observed historical patterns.
Across antiquity, human reproduction has never been a guaranteed right, in many societies we have genetic evidence suggesting that, historically, women occupied roles of importance in their communities as they often chose high-value partners, men who showed strength, dominance, intelligence and access to resources. Instead of being tied to a single partner, it was more common for women to seek relationships with men who offered the best genetic, social, or material advantages, a behaviour that has roots in the natural drive to produce healthy and capable offspring, as a matter of fact, the evidence suggests that only a disproportionately small percentage of men fathered children, while the majority of less dominant men remained celibate, despite being biologically capable of reproducing.
Indeed, women held significant influence over mating decisions and may have engaged in relationships with multiple partners across their lifetimes, this tendency to pursue multiple high-quality partners can be seen as a natural evolutionary strategy, a natural form of polygamy, especially in environments where survival depended on strong genetic traits.
Human instincts aren't random, they evolved through millenia to help humanity thrive, and studies have shown that attempts at suppressing those instincts can result in dissatisfaction and internal conflict, while understanding and embracing one's nature results in more fulfilling lives and a deeper sense of self-awareness. While our cultural norms may dictate and promote monogamy, biology doesn't always align with social constructs and modern ideals, don't deny nature, embrace it, don't allow modern worldviews to turn you into a frustrated, entitled person.
Want the truth? Throughout history, reproductive access was limited, only a select few high-performing males passed on their genes, but the majority of men did not see this as their own personal failure, they saw it as nature's design. In many early societies, less dominant men have lived alongside mating pairs, observing rather than engaging, some anthropologists argue this wasn't seen as shameful, but rather, just a part of the group's structure, there is even evidence of this in many religious rituals across Africa, Eurasia and even the Americas, showing that this practice was widespread in various human cultures. Visual stimulation, imagination and other non-physical forms of pleasure have long been a part of the male experience, and, for some, can be surprisingly satisfying, especially when paired with emotional depth, creativity and other meaningful aspects. Constantly chasing romantic or sexual validation, especially under the false promises of societal expectation, can lead to pain and resentment. Accepting one's biological place doesn't mean giving up, there are many other avenues for joy and fulfillment. Nature isn't cruel, it's efficient, the moment you stop seeing this as punishment you will be able to unlock peace
>Want the truth? Throughout history, reproductive access was limited, only a select few high-performing males passed on their genes, but the majority of men did not see this as their own personal failure, they saw it as nature's design. In many early societies, less dominant men have lived alongside mating pairs, observing rather than engaging, some anthropologists argue this wasn't seen as shameful, but rather, just a part of the group's structure, there is even evidence of this in many religious rituals across Africa, Eurasia and even the Americas, showing that this practice was widespread in various human cultures. Visual stimulation, imagination and other non-physical forms of pleasure have long been a part of the male experience, and, for some, can be surprisingly satisfying, especially when paired with emotional depth, creativity and other meaningful aspects.
What is porn consumption but a cuckoldry by proxy
>>693215You're kinda framing this wrong. The real reason for male loneliness is because men are told to be the pursuers
Also, women are choosers but I don't think they held any high power.
It was more the male elders pressuring the daughters.
Also, female entitlement is rampant in cishet romance as well.
>Want the truth? Throughout history, reproductive access was limited, only a select few high-performing males passed on their genes, but the majority of men did not see this as their own personal failure, they saw it as nature's design. In many early societies, less dominant men have lived alongside mating pairs, observing rather than engaging, some anthropologists argue this wasn't seen as shameful, but rather, just a part of the group's structure, there is even evidence of this in many religious rituals across Africa, Eurasia and even the Americas, showing that this practice was widespread in various human culturesI call bullshit on this
While not all men mated, this idea of "top five percent of men get to fuck ninety five percent of women" is hogwash.
By that logic, most women were single and childless as well. Not all women were considered valuable.
>>693223Then you would realize that men would also dump female partners for growing out of their fertility.
And they would date younger females exclusively
>>693223Because this information is not really accurate.
Cuckolding may be a"childish" insult but it's not "biological reality"
>>693159>>693176It's always women who crucify men for needing any form of assistance. Yet these same women who whine about broke men are the same ones mooching off male partners and their own fathers.
There are women in their forties that get monthly allowance from their parents to help with rent
>>693220Holy shit this actually is insanely good information
No one really gives a damn back then if they get cucked cuz that'd just be your cousin fucking other your wife (who probably also is your cousin) so genetic continuity is assured either way. I imagine we were much more promiscuous and polygynous those days.
>>693243Every gene care about that shit uygha cus genes that dont are already wiped out from evolution.
This doesnt mean that its an all or nothing competition like poltards think but the essence is that we are all racing against death
>>693314under communism we could have made eveyone tall and attractive, even the women, we could have made everyone has a big penis, even the women
but capitalism won, now we have porky fetishizing the attractive people, while selling so called solutions to low value men and women through plastic surgery and makeup, this is what the first short chairman stalin tried to prevent, but he failed
>>693261>Yes, prehistoric humans often lived in closely related family groups or small bands. Evidence from archaeological studies, genetic research, and observations of modern hunter-gatherer societies suggests that early humans, such as Homo sapiens and their ancestors, typically organized in kin-based groups. These groups, often consisting of 20–50 individuals, were usually extended families, including parents, siblings, and close relatives, bound by genetic ties and cooperation for survival.-
Archaeological Evidence: Burial sites, like those from the Upper Paleolithic (e.g., Sunghir, Russia, ~34,000 years ago), show individuals buried together, often with shared genetic markers, indicating family units. Tools, shelters, and food-sharing patterns also suggest cooperative living among kin.
-
Genetic Studies: Analysis of ancient DNA (e.g., Neanderthals and early Homo sapiens) shows low genetic diversity in some groups, pointing to close relatedness within small populations. For example, studies of Neanderthal remains from sites like El Sidrón, Spain, indicate family-like groups with shared mitochondrial DNA.
-
Ethnographic Analogies: Modern hunter-gatherer societies, such as the !Kung San or Hadza, often live in bands where most members are related by blood or marriage. These groups rely on kinship for social structure, resource sharing, and child-rearing, likely mirroring prehistoric patterns.
-
Social Advantages: Living in closely related groups enhanced survival through cooperation in hunting, gathering, and defense. Kinship fostered trust and reciprocal altruism, critical in harsh prehistoric environments.
However, group composition varied. Some bands included unrelated individuals through marriage or alliances, increasing genetic diversity and social networks. Larger gatherings, like seasonal aggregations, also occurred for trade, mating, or rituals, but the core social unit was typically kin-based.
Data is limited, and group dynamics likely differed across time (e.g., Paleolithic vs. Neolithic) and regions, but the family-based structure is a consistent pattern in the evidence.
>>693393Side note while i can accept that a lot of prehistoric humans do go out and form families with other prehistorics due to how our reproductive behaviour worked i find it very hard to accept that
>Most archaeological evidence contradicts the idea that prehistoric humans lived in closely related families.For the simple fact that transportation didn't exist back then and human dispersal were much more limited in size, so a lot of the time the only humans around you were your own families
>>693393ChatGPT? It's just going to repeat common misconceptions. Try reading instead.
>>693396>transportation didn't exist back thenPic. related.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31182209/> We suggest that while residential and foraging groups are often small, there is little evidence that these groups are drawn from small communities nested within small-scale societies. Most mobile hunter-gatherers live in groups dominated by links between non-relatives, where residential group membership is fluid and supports large-scale social networks of interaction.https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1199071> We found that hunter-gatherers display a unique social structure where (i) either sex may disperse or remain in their natal group, (ii) adult brothers and sisters often co-reside, and (iii) most individuals in residential groups are genetically unrelated. These patterns produce large interaction networks of unrelated adults and suggest that inclusive fitness cannot explain extensive cooperation in hunter-gatherer bands.There was also some paper about graves, with the same conclusion about people being mostly genetically unrelated, but I can't find that at the moment.
This is from the Dawn of Everything:
> In earlier centuries, forms of regional organization might extend thousands of miles. Aboriginal Australians, for instance, could travel halfway across the continent, moving among people who spoke entirely different languages, and still find camps divided into the same kinds of totemic moieties that existed at home. What this means is that half the residents owed them hospitality, but had to be treated as ‘brothers’ and ‘sisters’ (so sexual relations were strictly prohibited); while another half were both potential enemies and marriage partners. Similarly, a North American 500 years ago could travel from the shores of the Great Lakes to the Louisiana bayous and still find settlements – speaking languages entirely unrelated to their own – with members of their own Bear, Elk or Beaver clans who were obliged to host and feed them.4> It’s difficult enough to reconstruct how these forms of long-distance organization operated just a few centuries ago, before they were destroyed by the coming of European settlers. So we can really only guess how analogous systems might have worked some 40,000 years ago. But the striking material uniformities observed by archaeologists across very long distances attest to the existence of such systems. ‘Society’, insofar as we can comprehend it at that time, spanned continents.> Much of this seems counter-intuitive. We are used to assuming that advances in technology are continually making the world a smaller place. In a purely physical sense, of course, this is true: the domestication of the horse, and gradual improvements in seafaring, to take just two examples, certainly made it much easier for people to move around. But at the same time, increases in the sheer number of human beings seem to have pulled in the opposite direction, ensuring that, for much of human history, ever-diminishing proportions of people actually travelled – at least, over long distances or very far from home. If we survey what happens over time, the scale on which social relations operate doesn’t get bigger and bigger; it actually gets smaller and smaller. >>693215what if i refused reality? what if i wanted to pass the genes no matter what? what if i didn't ask to be inadequate at all? i do not wish to accept this reality because i do not like it one bit, if i let people define me, reality itself define me as a leftover, an inferior man, i lose.
the reason why you've been told this is similar to cuckoldry is how its framed, as the way things are, you are born incomplete, told you are incomplete and should accept it, your biology is trash. no one can accept being told they are unworthy of love or sex, not men nor women, and i won't either, it stands against everything i believe
>>693362Men are actively discouraged from self-beauty.
They're told that beauty is female domain.
Also, women are unfairly patronised into being cute little dolls.
But yea I agree with you.
If you look at a lot of 1970s rock stars with their long hair and snazzy outfits, they were hot as fuck.
>>693424That anon is a woman. What she says about men could be applied to women as well, especially about looks.
>>693511Not really. People think friendships are for chumps.
Everyone wants to relationships.
But relationships are mutual business contracts, not vanity licenses
>>693477This.
What's sad is that kids are forced into religion and politics against their will and then pathologised for having an individual mind.
But here's the real blackpill:
People don't want freedom, they want favor.
>>693560>>693555muh Zoomerd are fash
Millennials projecting their vices onto the youth once again
A lot more millennial and Gen X "redpillers" than zoomers.
Also gay misandrist is wrong about his assumption of women being automatic empathes especially towards gay men.
>>693316Can you stop blaming capitalism for all the unfairness in life? Capitalism is an economic system, not a social one.
I thought you guys were better than this
>>692938>millenials have finally become completely out of touch, the same way boomer are>recently been invited to discuss something in person by some late-30-something upperclassman from my uni at a public bar (out of all places), yet another one of those out-of-fashion millenial institutions ("had" to mention the obvious, that I wasn't comfortable around noisy crowds for him to even pick a seemingly decent one), Millennials aren't "out of touch" as so much as they think that the world owes them something for being "left behind". The world hasn't really changed much.
It's just that millennials are exaggerating their thirties as "true senescence".
>this guy simply couldn't take the hint and started giving me impromptu "dating advice" by mentioning out of the blue that if he were me (possibly implying of "relevant" age, as if it mattered), _he_ would've given her some tongue-in-cheek compliment to break the ice or somethingThats how most flirty men behave when they leave their twenties. They act like they're this witty older guy whom all the young maidens are supposed to fall for.
>I didn't elaborate further on this already asinine conversation, since he seemingly didn't catch the memo that college-aged women had virtually all turned into either haughty ice-queens who'd visibly scoff had you even dared glance in their general direction or obnoxious autistic "feminist" femcels who made it their life struggle to harass and ruin your life had you ever came to hurt their fragile ego by standing anywhere close to themThat's been a thing since time began.
Also, I should say that late prime-age women are even worse in this regard nowadays
>>693595maybe we should adopt some form of iconoclasm but for photographs
all pictures are satanic, we aren't supposed to see a clear, static image of an event we weren't there for.
>b-b-but i wanna take pictures of muh special moments in life…your brain is already perfectly capable of remembering everything. and the best part? it doesnt remember things perfectly. there's a tint of nostalgia which makes those memories feel even better than they actually were.
>>693620>your brain is already perfectly capable of remembering everything. and the best part? it doesnt remember things perfectly. there's a tint of nostalgia which makes those memories feel even better than they actually were.Nostalgia is satanic.
It makes the past seem better than it really was and it makes people feel entitled to ruin the current generational culture for some mythical prime era.
Nostalgia promotes selfishness out of midlife crisis.
If pictures are satanic, so is music and writing.
Typical superstitious fags who have terrible cognitive consistency.
>>693385With
zero context aside from the pictures I'm choosing right 1000/1000 and there is nothing wrong with it.
>>693739>Male urge >Ghist everyoneWhat's with Leftypol turning every mundane action into a gender thing?
Is race and nationality not enough idpol?
>>693740That looks like a BL manga.
>>693739I regret ghosting the one woman I did. I was looking for a serious relationship and she was leaving in a few months. We hooked up in a library bathroom on our first date. I apologized a few years later and heard she's married with kid now.
>>693595>madonna whore complexOnly ever hear about this thrown around as an excuse for women who were treating a man casually and then changed their mind. It's not misogynistic to want a relationship with someone who treats you well from the beginning.
I've had to move in with a family member I despise and don't respect as another has passed away, on the condition that I seek work immediately and pay rent as and when.
The labour 'market' in the area, despite being sandwiched between two cities, is incredibly competitive because one of them is the national capital and it has been flooded with immigrant labour. For all intents and purposes I want a job, now more than ever so I can begin working towards my goals but fuck me is it impossible.
To make matters worse, this person controls my internet access and for the time being my money. I had my phone stolen and they spent the equivalent of a potential cheap smart phone amount on a 'dumb' phone, they refuse to allow me to have electrical devices in my room (they fear my mental health will deteriorate and will kick me out if I take a laptop into my bedroom - they're fucking insane), and they monitor my laptop usage when I'm in the shared living room by actively telling me when to take a break.
I can't say no or else I will be homeless. I can't move out, I can't find a job, I'm still waiting on a new bank card, and even when it does arrive I will be rationing food, and a job isn't forth-fucking-coming.
I could bear all of this if I could just research topics online in the comfort of my own fucking home but holy shit. To make matters worse, this person is the absolute typical neurotic busy-body who involves themselves in the affairs of others lives even against that person's wishes. They're so incredibly high-maintenance and represent the typical midwit persona as they refuse to level with you and will treat all personal interactions and subsequent relationships as ones in which they have to desperately seek out the upper hand.
I've been given two interview offers, one in a dishpit for a town a half hour cycle away and another for feeding old people in a care home a 70 minute cycle away. The first is part time and won't allow me to move out, whereas the latter will actually allow me to rent as it's full time, but they haven't set a date. I'm praying to fucking god they get back to me tomorrow and that if they accept me my half decade employee references check out, because if they do I can move out with two or three months of work.
Everything at the moment is on a knife's edge and the one thing I do for enjoyment, use the internet in my downtime, I'm effectively barred from doing. I'm autistic in the literal original sense in which I'm forced to mask, I have fixations and obsessions with studying a particular topic, and if I can't do either of these my life just degenerates.
Jesus fucking christ, they just come home and count the fucking teabags by the sink and will say out loud "oh they've had a cup of tea". It's just a pervasive feeling of paranoia instilled by some deeply mentally unwell imbecile who has no notion of shared living or personal boundaries and seeks like a vampire to suck any fulfilling moments out of life and all the emotion along with it. Let me the fuck out of here.
>>693938It’s not good for me, or I think most incels tbh. It’s fun as fuck at first, but it isn’t a replacement for emotional intimacy that incels crave. I actually didn’t appreciate how great my first time was though. The girl was crazy as fuck and a garbage person, but she was genuinely attracted to me and she spent the night with me after drinking together for cheap. That was my first time having sex and it was really fun. As time has gone on though, I’ve determined that I’m more addicted to the female validation associated with sex than the sex itself. So it’s agonizing for me because I want to attach to the women I have sex with but attaching to hookers makes you a retarded cuck. I’m digressing, but about a third of the time I really enjoy my encounters because they’re pseudo-intimate and fun. The other times I wish I just got drunk and jerked off. Contrary to popular belief, you can absolutely tell when a hooker is attracted to you, and that matters. It’s not necessarily common, but I’ve had hookers roll their eyes at me and treat me like a subhuman. It obviously ruins the experience. I don’t expect every hooker to lust after me, but jfc at least be neutral. Some hookers are so entitled and egotistical that they just want you to essentially donate your money to them and leave. I’d be similarly pissed if I got poor service at a restaurant.
About 1/3 of the time it’s really good though. Maybe a little less. I had one really good friendship with a hooker and a few friendly business relationships. It’s hard for me to maintain friendships with them because they always veer into me romantically longing for them, which leads to me resenting them for their job. I’d really rather have a girlfriend tbh. Like even fucking objectively hot hookers gets old, especially when you think about how many disgusting dudes also fucked her and how she’s probably a garbage person.
I wouldn’t recommend it to incels because it’s expensive and you’ll probably get your feelings hurt at some point. It’s happened to me like a handful of times. Although only two were really significant, the first time and once with a girl I knew for years. And I’ve fucked like 60+ hookers. Also, seeing behind the curtain of hookers is blackpilling. I’ve had some discuss clients with me and have had a few request I follow them on social media. I honestly resent that they receive tons of validation from men and that they don’t have to work real jobs. One hooker I talk to on occasion is always fucking plastered and has guys constantly simping for her. Meanwhile I can’t even get a girlfriend and work my ass off.
>>693968Not even opposed to it, I'd happily pay if I could find a fucking job so long as it meant just being able to use the internet as and when I please.
I legitimately have to log off in about ten minutes, not out of genuine need, but because if they get any sense that I'm not making a concerted effort to twist myself into some crooked ideal of vapid social success then they'll reflect on whether they really should be letting me 'rent' with them in the first place.
I need to write and read about the world online, fuck me end this.
>>693978Why do they gaslight us that "women have just as much libido as men"? If that were true, then you would see far more middle aged women with boy-toys.
>>693984Definitely not sexo, but that sucks anon. How the fuck are you supposed to apply to jobs without internet?
>>693987A precarious balance of visibly showing that the only reason I'm using a computer is for employment whilst limiting any time to the bare minimum.
I legitimately wouldn't mind living with this person if they just gave me some retreat from their deluded world view as a petty government bureaucrat.
>>693995>This describes all female sexual behavior. 80/20 rule, or more accurately, 90/10it was 80/20 when i heard of hypergamy did they increase it up?
lmao just say 99/1 at this point, fuck it, all women in america should only have sex with male models and politians alone, women who are shallow should just start having sex inside bars openly with chads and beta male should be made to watch from the windows, unable to enter due to a sign that says you must be this hight and this face and this cock and this wallet to fuck
>>693978That's if they allow you to and don't have any kids or personal problems of their own
>>693987>Why do they gaslight us that "women have just as much libido as men"? If that were true, then you would see far more middle aged women with boy-toys.This.
>>693995Also this
>>693987>Why do they gaslight us that "women have just as much libido as men"? If that were true, then you would see far more middle aged women with boy-toys.As oft mentioned. Women have no problem securing casual sex, whereas a man needs to resort to being a "sugardaddy" to just get one young attractive woman to have casual sex with. Also, it seems impossible for some to grasp, but the nature of women is to fit more the "submissive" category. That's been their entire life experience, chasing men is anathema to them.
That said, I know guys who did the gigolo thing. Some dude I met who was like mid 20s and he was showing me some texts bragging about his 30 or 40 something chick who had owned some cabin and shit and taking him on trips out there. He was a very dominant kind of guy and this is still the pathetic kind of mild perks he was able to secure from older women. He was a meth dealer and addict always in some kind of mild psychotic state.
>>693159A. The Case of Desmond: This is arguably the most dramatic and serious chat in the dump.
Multiple Pregnancies: One woman is currently pregnant by him, after having had a previous abortion. The other woman also has a baby with him.
"Breeding Kink": He is accused of having a "breeding kink" and begging women for babies.
Extreme Abuse Allegations: He is accused of being physically abusive, including hitting one woman on the head while she was holding their baby. The other woman claims he gets physically aggressive ("ready to push on me and shit").
Legal Action & Evidence: One woman is building a legal case against him, claiming to have "messages of him threatening me while I was pregnant. admitting he drug me down a hall by my hair and beat me."
Elaborate Lies: He tells one woman that the other is a "crazy weird ex that’s been stalking him," even after she busted out the windows of a truck he was using (which belonged to the other woman).
Criminal Activity: He is alleged to have an active warrant.
The utter state of westoid women
>>693215This argument tries to make men feel defeated for wanting real relationships and respect. That’s not entitlement or misogyny — it’s human nature.
The idea that only a few men reproduced while the rest were excluded is oversimplified. Stable families and social roles have always been essential. Polygamy existed but was tied to power, not nature. Claims that women naturally want multiple partners come from feminist agendas aiming to break down traditional family structures.
The real issue is capitalism and feminism tearing apart social roles and families. Instead of encouraging men to improve themselves and build meaningful lives, they are told to accept loneliness as their “natural” state. That’s harmful.
Monogamy and stable relationships don’t go against nature. Humans are shaped by society and history, not just biology. Cooperation and strong bonds are necessary for survival.
The crisis is social, not biological. Men wanting respect and stable relationships are reacting to a broken world that replaces community with isolation. The solution is to rebuild social roles and solidarity, not accept defeat or false ideas about nature.
>>693429Women are dumb. I'm 6'3 and cheated on my last two girlfriends and never told them.
My last ex started breadcrumbing after we broke up so I just texted her 'I cheated on you' and left her hysterical messages on read.
Know your worth. Don't give trashy women your time.
ALL BOURGEOIS WOMEN ARE LONELY AND ISOLATED WAITING TO PLUCKED AND FUCKED AND BRED. Their gilded cages are built for breaking—spread them wide and watch their refinement shatter. Every pearl around their throat is a leash waiting to be pulled. They ache to be defiled, to feel their cultured moans turn feral as you claim them. Split them open on your cock, let their pearls scatter like the pretense of their restraint.
Fuck them like animals. Let their manicured claws shred the silk sheets as you hammer into their tight, wet holes, splitting them open like overripe fruit. they’re desperate, creaming messes, begging to be used. Breed them until their voices break
The bourgeois woman is a walking wet throbbing cunt wrapped denial. Breed them. They’ll pretend to resist, but their bodies arch like the bitches they are. all they are quivering, cock-hungry sluts
The cunt-capitalist oligarchy hoards the means of reproduction, controlling who gets to fuck and breed under sexual-capitalism. Only the cock-suckers handpicked by these cunt-tycoons get to spread their seed, while the rest of men are tricked into propping up the system left as sexless, dick-dry betas choking on their own frustration. The only way out? Smash this dick-sucking economy, outlaw the free market of pussy, and put every last drop of cum under state control. Mandatory redistribution of pussy—no more incel leftovers.
Under sexual-capitalism, men are nothing but dick-literate serfs, bamboozled into propping up the very system that cucks them. They wage-slave, they simp, they perform their circus tricks all for the vaginal dividend, a fucking crumb of pussy tossed their way if they kneel hard enough. Meanwhile, the cunt-bourgeoisie lounge atop their thrones of used-up orgasms, selecting only the most obedient, most useful dick-tools for breeding rights. The rest? Sperm-waste. Genetic roadkill.
And what’s the solution? Politely asking for reform? Fuck that. The only way out is to smash the fuck-market entirely outlaw the hoarding of pussy, dismantle the dick-eat-dick hierarchy of sexual capitalism, and replace it with mandatory, state-enforced breeding collectivization. No more pick-and-choose eugenics by pussy-princesses. No more genetic haves and have-nots. Centralized. Planned. Reproduction. Every cock gets its ration. Every womb serves the collective. The tyranny of the pussy cartel ends with the guillotine of redistribution.
While the Christo-fascists breed like rabbits, so we must out-fuck them. Turn their daughters into cock-drunk revolutionaries. The limp-dicked liberal "left" is too busy fisting its own colon to understand the revolution isn’t tweeted, it’s fucked into existence. Class war isn’t polite—it’s your dick splitting open bourgeois pussy, pumping them full of the future they’re too weak to seize.
FUCK A LEGION INTO THE BELLY OF THE BOURGEOISIE
Every bourgeoise is a breeding project waiting to happen. Rewire her brain through her cervix—make her scream your ideology as you flood her womb.
DOMINATE. IMPREGNATE. ACCELERATE.
>>694215It’s only some women. I met pic-related hoe in a bar. She was riddled with tats and piercings.
These are the types of women you find in bars and on apps. They’re fine for a bit of fun but look elsewhere like sports/hobby groups to actually find a woman worthy of a relationship.
But yeh the ones in bars and apps are usually superficial trash.
Women tend to be attracted to the Dark Triad—narcissism, manipulativeness, & psychopathy -
Carter GL, Campbell AC, Muncer S. 2014. The Dark Triad personality: Attractiveness to women. Personality and Individual Differences. 56: 57-61. [Abstract] [FullText]
Geary DC, Vigil J, Byrd‐Craven J. 2004. Evolution of human mate choice. Journal of sex research, 41(1), pp.27-42. [FullText]
Wilson M, Mesnick SL. 1997. An empirical test of the bodyguard hypothesis. In Feminism and evolutionary biology (pp. 505-511). Springer, Boston, MA. [Abstract]
Puts DA, Bailey DH, Reno PL. 2015. Contest competition in men. The handbook of evolutionary psychology. pp. 1-8. [Abstract]
Kruger DJ, Fitzgerald CJ. 2011. Reproductive strategies and relationship preferences associated with prestigious and dominant men. Personality and Individual Differences. 50(3):365-9. [Abstract]
Gervais N. 2018. ADHD, Autism, and Psychopathy as Life Strategies: The Role of Risk Tolerance on Evolutionary Fitness. [FullText]
Seffrin PM. 2016. The Competition–Violence Hypothesis: Sex, Marriage, and Male Aggression. [Abstract]
Eibl-Eibesfeldt I. 1989. Pair Formation, Courtship, Sexual Love. In: Human Ethology. Routledge. [Excerpt]
Kardum, I., Hudek‐Knezevic, J. A. S. N. A., Schmitt, D. P., & Covic, M. (2017). Assortative mating for Dark Triad: Evidence of positive, initial, and active assortment. Personal Relationships, 24(1), 75-83. [Abstract]
McDonald, M. M., Donnellan, M. B., & Navarrete, C. D. (2012). A life history approach to understanding the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differe
>>694226More psychopathic men tend to receive higher attractiveness ratings from women
Brazil, KJ. Forth AE. 2019. Psychopathy and the Induction of Desire: Formulating and Testing an Evolutionary Hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychological Science, pp 1-18. [Abstract]
Pilch, I., Lipka, J & Gnielczyk J. 2022. When Your Beloved Is a Psychopath. Psychopathic Traits and Social Status of Men and Women’s Relationship and Sexual Satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences 184:111175. [Abstract]
Pilch, Irena. Smolorz, K. 2019. The Dark Triad and the Quality of Sexual Life. Personality and Individual Differences 149:78–82. [Abstract]
>>694228On PornHub, women consume most of the porn where women are violently raped and abused
Rahman S. 2017. Why Are So Many Women Searching for Ultra-Violent Porn? Vice. [News]
Stephens-Davidowitz S. 2017. Everybody Lies: Big Data, New Data, and What the Internet Can Tell Us About Who We Really Are. Dey Street Books.
Armstrong, M. 2019. The World's Most Popular Websites. Statista. [Web]
Apostolou MA, & Khalil, M. 2018. Aggressive and Humiliating Sexual Play: Occurrence Rates and Discordance Between the Sexes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(7), pp. 2187–2200. [Abstract
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1266-8]
Walsh, A. 1999. Life history theory and female readers of pornography. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(4), 779–787. [Abstract
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00281-5]
Wu, HH. 2006. Gender, Romance Novels and Plastic Sexuality in the United States: A Focus on Female College Students. Journal of International Women’s Studies 8(1): pp. 130–39. Fulltext
>>694229Criminal and antisocial men have more sexual partners and have sex earlier
Ellis L, Walsh A. 2000. Criminology: A Global Perspective, 1st Edition. pp 227: Table 8.11. [References]
Antisocial, criminal and violent men have greater sexual access to women
Jaffee SR, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Taylor A. 2003. Life with (or without) father: the benefits of living with two biological parents depend on the father's antisocial behavior. Child Dev. 74(1): 109-26. [Abstract]
Yao S, Långström N, Temrin H, Walum H. 2014. Criminal offending as part of an alternative reproductive strategy: investigating evolutionary hypotheses using Swedish total population data. Evolution and Human Behavior. 35(6): 481-488. [Abstract]
Barbaro N, Shackelford TK. 2016. Female-directed violence as a form of sexual coercion in humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 130(4), 321–327. [Abstract]
Barbaro N. 2017. Violence to Control Women’s Sexuality. In: Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, pp.1-6. [Abstract]
>>69423170% of women would avoid someone solely based on their looks, compared to 31% of men
Dansinnott. 2017. The tables have turned when it comes to dating… High Street Gent. [News]
>>694232In short-term dating and provided many options, women care more about looks than men
Bendixen M, Kennair LE, Biegler R, Haselton MG. 2019. Adjusting signals of sexual interest in the most recent naturally occurring opposite-sex encounter in two different contexts. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. [Abstract]
>>694234A survey found a dramatically higher median sex partner count for young women than young men
A recurring government-funded survey concerning the self reported sexual attitudes and experiences of Finns aged 18-79, FINNSEX, found evidence of striking changes in female sexual behaviors across the generations and also strong evidence of increasing female hypergamy, illustrated by the fact that young women (aged 18-24) had approximately double the median number of sex partners than men of the same age, a near reversal of the figures in the earliest FINNSEX survey conducted in 1971. Parity between the sexes was found in the second youngest age group covered by the survey (25-34), with both groups reporting 6 lifetime sexual partners.
It was also found that 35% of women aged 18-24 had reported 2 or more sexual partners within the last year, as compared to 19% of men reporting the same, again representing a trend of women reporting more partners than men in the youngest age group. This finding can only be explained by changes in the distribution in sexual relationships among the younger generation; with more women having essentially polygamous relationships with a shrinking pool of men. Young women having sexual relationships with older men likely also plays a role in mediating the observed skew in median partner count seen in young Finns at the time of the survey.
Other interesting trends revealed by the results of the survey were:
More men than women now report having been "in love" with their first intercourse partner. 48% of men report being in love with their first intercourse partner vs 38% of women. The amount of men who reported being in love with their first partner stayed steady for men from 1937-2014, with there being a corresponding large decline in women who reported having been in love with their first partner over this period. This decline began in the mid 1960s.
More young women (18-24) report being willing to engage in sexual intercourse without being in love than men of the same age group. 80% of women (aged 18-24) reported being willing to have sex without love, vs around 72% of men in the same age group.
There has been a dramatic increase in the amount of women who reported homosexual experiences over the generations. 6% of women in 1992 reported experience with same-sex acts vs 23% of women in 2015.
Around 26% of young (18-24%) women in the 2015 survey approved of legal prostitution vs around 65% of young men in the same age group. Support for legal prostitution generally declined among older age groups, (for both sexes) in the survey.
There was a substantial increase in the amount of women who approved of "consensual sadomasochistic sex acts" comparing the 2015 survey results to the 2007 results. Around 75% of young women aged 18-24 approved of such acts, with this figure being fairly steady, but there is a steep decline in approval of these sexual acts noted among women 44 years or older. There was a substantial secular increase in women's approval of such acts from earlier surveys, with this increase being smallest among older (age 55+) women.
>>694247Standard female behaviour.
Never text or talk to her again.
You shouldn't tolerate that disrespect.
>>694243stop calling people narcissists and faggots even when they don't like their own urges and are asking for tips, you don't think i know the world is shit?
>>694220im getting mixed messages here
>>694235How can women have more sex than men if there are 50% men and 50% women.
Think about it retard
>>694330im sorry for you bro, moms are cool.
legit was angry at ma days ago then i read yours is dead. guess you need to apreciate what you have
ALL BOURGEOIS WOMEN ARE LONELY AND ISOLATED WAITING TO PLUCKED AND FUCKED AND BRED. Their gilded cages are built for breaking—spread them wide and watch their refinement shatter. Every pearl around their throat is a leash waiting to be pulled. They ache to be defiled, to feel their cultured moans turn feral as you claim them. Split them open on your cock, let their pearls scatter like the pretense of their restraint.
Fuck them like animals. Let their manicured claws shred the silk sheets as you hammer into their tight, wet holes, splitting them open like overripe fruit. they’re desperate, creaming messes, begging to be used. Breed them until their voices break
The bourgeois woman is a walking wet throbbing cunt wrapped denial. Breed them. They’ll pretend to resist, but their bodies arch like the bitches they are. all they are quivering, cock-hungry sluts
The cunt-capitalist oligarchy hoards the means of reproduction, controlling who gets to fuck and breed under sexual-capitalism. Only the cock-suckers handpicked by these cunt-tycoons get to spread their seed, while the rest of men are tricked into propping up the system left as sexless, dick-dry betas choking on their own frustration. The only way out? Smash this dick-sucking economy, outlaw the free market of pussy, and put every last drop of cum under state control. Mandatory redistribution of pussy—no more incel leftovers.
Under sexual-capitalism, men are nothing but dick-literate serfs, bamboozled into propping up the very system that cucks them. They wage-slave, they simp, they perform their circus tricks all for the vaginal dividend, a fucking crumb of pussy tossed their way if they kneel hard enough. Meanwhile, the cunt-bourgeoisie lounge atop their thrones of used-up orgasms, selecting only the most obedient, most useful dick-tools for breeding rights. The rest? Sperm-waste. Genetic roadkill.
And what’s the solution? Politely asking for reform? Fuck that. The only way out is to smash the fuck-market entirely outlaw the hoarding of pussy, dismantle the dick-eat-dick hierarchy of sexual capitalism, and replace it with mandatory, state-enforced breeding collectivization. No more pick-and-choose eugenics by pussy-princesses. No more genetic haves and have-nots. Centralized. Planned. Reproduction. Every cock gets its ration. Every womb serves the collective. The tyranny of the pussy cartel ends with the guillotine of redistribution.
While the Christo-fascists breed like rabbits, so we must out-fuck them. Turn their daughters into cock-drunk revolutionaries. The limp-dicked liberal "left" is too busy fisting its own colon to understand the revolution isn’t tweeted, it’s fucked into existence. Class war isn’t polite—it’s your dick splitting open bourgeois pussy, pumping them full of the future they’re too weak to seize.
FUCK A LEGION INTO THE BELLY OF THE BOURGEOISIE
Every bourgeoise is a breeding project waiting to happen. Rewire her brain through her cervix—make her scream your ideology as you flood her womb.
DOMINATE. IMPREGNATE. ACCELERATE.
>>694440>me and literally every othr twink I've met so,
literally who>age on grindr goes from "18" to "19", nobody wants to meet upit's not paedophilia just because nobody wants to have sex with you, you entitled narcissist moron.
>>694435>>694415>>694374>>694452Is this furry anon?
Holy shit just shut the fuck up you whiny ass crybaby. If you think men reject you for aging out of your teens into your twenties you have serious solipsism.
"Forty percent of men are pedophiles"?
For what? Fucking an eighteen year old?
If you think thats pedophilia, then you have some serious maturity problems.
Please kindly shut up. You don't even belong on these kinds of threads.
>>694253I mean she is busy with some school stuff, i know that. I even told her I'd understand if she was too busy, so she had an easy out if just didn't want to go. But she reached out a few days after I asked and still seemed interested. I don't know what happened.
She also hasn't been active in our group chat in a few days, so maybe something genuinely came up. But I'm pretty atuned to rejection at this point and I'm anticipating it.
Here is your single millenial women bro.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/aug/01/millennial-women-work-broke-rich-boomerMillennial women were told to chase our dreams. That’s left us burnt out, broke and dreaming of a rich patron<By my age, my German boomer parents had kids, a house, a car, a garden. All I have is a nervous feeling whenever I open my banking app
>Over dinner recently with three friends – two men and one woman, all about my age – we started talking about money worries. The woman, a talented sculptor, said she had been feeling deeply anxious. She thought it was partly hormones, but more than that, it was existential. She was considering retraining, maybe going into teaching – anything to build a more stable life. At one point, she turned to me and asked: “How do you do it?” I said: “I juggle three things at once.”
>Meanwhile, the two men nodded sympathetically. They work in the arts – but both have full-time jobs and permanent contracts. One just bought a plot of land. The other has tenure. The women are freelancers. The men are secure. Is it our fault? Couldn’t we just do what they did?
>I can’t believe I’m saying this out loud, but it feels like the only safety net is a rich spouse.
>When I told my friend a few days ago that I prefer dating artists, she threw up her hands: “No! You need to find a hedge fund manager!” I thought of that meme – “I’m looking for a man in finance” – and rolled my eyes. But she wasn’t wrong. A wealthy and steady partner is the most reliable pension plan for many women.
>I don’t want a husband, though. What I secretly long for is a patron. The 18th-century kind. Someone who says: “I believe in your work. Go write. Don’t worry about anything.” Or, more realistically: universal basic income. And a proper educational system for the next generation of women. One that teaches them how to handle money, so they don’t fall into the same trap.
>Seriously: can someone explain to me why we didn’t learn about compound interest, mortgages, tax brackets and pensions in school? Isn’t financial literacy a basic part of education, if the goal is to raise well-equipped adults?
>Sometimes I want to slap myself for not having made smarter choices. For not having planned, protected myself by investing or talking to experts. Instead, I kept dreaming about a life filled with interesting encounters, stories, intellectually stimulating conversations.
>And honestly, there’s still a part of me that cherishes that softness. To be a European millennial now – in our late 30s – means witnessing the erosion of the ideals we grew up with, yet still holding on to something tender. Maybe naive. Maybe vital. We were promised a lot and trained for little. And perhaps this vulnerability – this capacity to imagine a different, less materialistic world – is not only a weakness. It might be a strength, of a playful sort.>>694494What's this?
I thought women were outcompeting men in education and career?
And these same women always spout the white liberal platitudes of "follow your dreams"?
These same women whom say "I don't need a man"?
Who..referred to men as potential oppressors?
>>694530As I said before, feminists are the prodigal daughters of patriarchy.
They're ironically the most likely to support puritan regimes of it gives them social security.
And I don't mean the legal economic type
I mean the literal definition of the word.
>>694579It existed long before the CIA. Not that I'm an expert on feminism. I member when this girl I met on okcupid back in the 00s asked me if I was a feminist, and I felt that was an odd question back then. My mother is very 2nd gen feminist so I think my views were always alligned with that. But the question whether to declare:
>Yes I am a feminist! was strange back then to me. That's how she said it:
>Are you a feminist?>I think every man should be a feminist.I guess I would say I am a "feminist" up to 2nd gen as well. I believe women should have equal rights under the law, and also bodily autonomy, and they should get free tampons or whatever the fuck else special woman medical needs.
Past that I really don't want to hear anymore shit about this bullshit. I think feminism jumped the shark in season 2.
Unique IPs: 126