For compliance reasons, the moderation team has voted to MANDATE spoilering all NSFW images, site-wide.
This takes effect as of now, August 16, 2025. Please take note.
59 posts and 21 image replies omitted.This is such a retarded decision.
1) This is si/b/eria and OPs are already spoilered, what more do you fuckers want?
2) This just means fewer people will be posting or opening spoilered images since it's easy to post all sorts of vile shit
3) Not even into the porn but this ruins the entire point of 'free' imageboard posting, although that's been dead here long before this to be fair.
Just adjust the JS to have an option that reveals spoilered thumbnails on selection, so people can view the thumbnails without needing to open a full res of someone's rectum when checking a spoilered image.
>>699709>compliance reasonsThank you r/socialism, Hiromoot would be proud of your cucking out.
>>699926Rule 10 has been changed because that was not the case before. The spoiling of pornographic OPs was also a change that didn't previously exist until a (relatively) recent time ago.
>inb4 muh overboardThat's the point of /sfw/
>>701738i assume this is in response to a bunch of european nations passing laws censoring porn and mandating age verification
>>701738As someone that uses the porn threads regularly, I like this change. Better loading times and less ammo for complainers. This could be due to me using activitypub for a few years soethe idea of a content warning feild is maundane to me. Then again I often see newcomers over there froth at the mouth that they need to toggle a setting to auto-expand them, or that porn, vent and food posts are slightly less space efficient as a result of having a headline.
>>699709It this same vein, it'd be neat if we had a way to make a line of text collapsable. Like we have
this but it takes the same amount of space. I sometimes run tests on LLMs and just put it in a code block to indicate that it is AI generated, but that puts it in a pre tag which disables wrapping–good for actual code, but for paragraphs that's pain. If we had a way to put a line in a details / summary tag that would be a godsend.
>>701881>It this same vein, it'd be neat if we had a way to make a line of text collapsable. Like we have this but it takes the same amount of space. I sometimes run tests on LLMs and just put it in a code block to indicate that it is AI generated, but that puts it in a pre tag which disables wrapping–good for actual code, but for paragraphs that's pain. If we had a way to put a line in a details / summary tag that would be a godsend.take it to the tech feedback thread in meta
>>701957this one is the exception
>>701738I can't speak for all threads, but the I believe the hentai thread and the "post porn" thread are free of vile shit and shock images.
Jesus Christ. RIP 420chan
>>700915 Loli, reported.
>>700948 Loli, reported
>>701294 Illegal content, Asuka is 14 years old.
>>702293 This should be spoiled.
we need a seperate nsfw thread already
>>705817i meant board, in retard mode
>bans porn
>doesn't ban nazis
based moralistic rules
>>706330The Modocracy has its priorities, doesn't it?
>>705817just have a separate site atp
>>706401We just need to murder and cannibalize the mods and take this one back from the glowies, sharty spies, and hazlite /pol/ carpetbaggers.
I really like what ya did here pal.
>>705639uygha that make no sense facsists in europa love their marble bust clitties
>>708402In america they put you in prison for them.
>>708404sus pdf-coded taste
>>7017381 month later and I was right. All the porn threads are dead and half the spoilered pics are random garbage
>>708848Like I said 2 months earlier its over. Reactionary scum inhabiting this chan won and now we have no "degeneracy" but instead very low tier discussion about idpol and latest liberal nationalism.
>>710056The mods are literally unilaterally banning things just because they think it's "unsightly" (their words.) I think this place has become worse than r/socialism.
>>710087My eyes see this clearly, my mind should not. Good mod work.
The creepy ugly dude with the blue Hawaiian shirt… I'm tired of seeing his face whenever I visit this board. Who is that and why do we have to look at him making that retarded face?
Change it. Spoiler it. Remove it. Whoever thought it was "cool" or something to post that with those teeth? Wrong.
I don't want to see that guy here anymore.
>>710087Yeah, I just had this total FAGGOT FUCKFACE of a mod ban me for 14d, 'not touching enough grass' just because I outsmarted him and made him look like the embarrassing douche he is.
What a sore loser. Is that all the mods? Is that why those guys made their own offshoot of this site? Because up until today this site was always pretty cool. Some of the pretentious communism nerds suck, but they can't just remove threads when you make fun of them for calling everything "bourgeois".
Maybe once they lose their virginity and/or 200 lbs they will learn to do their jobs. Meaning "less is more" when it comes to bans.
Fucking faggots.
>>710854I think that's the admin's avatar, she's used it for a thread or two. It's from a movie or smth idk.
Add an option to unspoiler all images you prudish fucks
Yea, include nightmare mode
>>710087hot take
as bad as /r/socialism was about idpol and glow, that's not as bad as the reactionary socialists we have here now
>>713378The two polarities are "Clapping is ableist" vs. "Yeah, I'm totally a socialist here on stupidpol. Socialism is when there's a welfare state and I can still proselytize about how black people are innately stupid; this isn't racist btw! Check out this 4chan graph!"
Both of these are cancerous garbage and both of these would have Marx rolling over in his grave. That this dichotomy is the dominant strain indicates something is gravely wrong with the Left's current foundational grasp of things.
>>701294I've made a version three. Now images are only loaded when they're moused over. This should lighten the bandwidth load.
I wrote this version because marking an image as a spoiler prevents thumbnail generation. Hence I
have to download the entire image to auto unspoiler it.
(function() {
const links = document.getElementsByTagName("a");
for (let i = 0; i < links.length; i++) {
const link = links[i];
if (
link.href &&
link.href.match(/(\.png|\.jpg|\.jpeg|\.webp)$/) &&
link.children.length == 1 &&
link.children[0].tagName == 'IMG' &&
link.children[0].src.match('/static/spoiler_alunya.png$')
) {
const image = link.children[0];
function unspoiler(event) {
image.src = link.href;
function resize(event) {
const width = image.naturalWidth;
const height = image.naturalHeight;
const scale = Math.min(255/width, 255/height);
image.style.width = width*scale + 'px';
image.style.height = height*scale + 'px';
image.removeEventListener('load', resize)
}
image.addEventListener('load', resize);
image.removeEventListener('mouseover', unspoiler);
}
image.addEventListener('mouseover', unspoiler);
}
}
})(); >>713999>Now images are only loaded when they're moused overso they're effectively still spoiled? kek
Since the heart of the problem lies server side (spoiled images not serving the thumbnails) might be better to request a new feature on the leftypol repo to
1. create a new type of spoiler called NSFW
2. a new option to automatically un-spoil nsfw spoilers, by replacing the new spoiler image with the thumbnail
https://forgejo.leftypol.org/leftypol/leftypol >>714314>might be better to request a new feature on the leftypol repo this, I agree its annoying, using a porn thread is pure pain
>>713403And the "clapping is ablist" side didn't even exist to begin with, both percieved sides were just the latter.
So if the only solution is to be more ruthless than CIA then why dont we skin these faggot MODS alive and establish proletarian democracy.
>>714314having different types of spoilers has been something we could have used for a long time tbh
honestly we definitely use the feature more for NSFW than actual spoilers
>>713999Very interesting. Is it possible to do such a hover-over-image to unspoiler with CSS? Or is it JS exclusively?
Why don't you just make them… wait in hell??
>>717919We already are in jannycracy hell of sorts.
It's woke. It matters.
Unique IPs: 39