For compliance reasons, the moderation team has voted to MANDATE spoilering all NSFW images, site-wide.
This takes effect as of now, August 16, 2025. Please take note.
lame
what qualifies as nsfw for clarity?
mods = gods
sorry, but the porn addiction WILL end
>>699709>>699771If the government mandated that you have to get on a bed, spread your cheeks and take me and my bros anally, one after another, would you also comply with that?
compliance with…..?
Ban porn entirely
>>699803
mods have always been retarded. harsher against anime bullshit than literal CSAM, harsher against marxist critique than feel-good liberalism, etc etc
>>699803
leftypol is an islamic website insallah pbuh
I want to thank rapefiend for finally forcing mods to deal with all the porn spam, he is emperor Leto guiding this site towards golden path.
how do you spoil images
>>699709>the moderation team has voted to MANDATE spoilering all NSFW images, site-wide.>site-wideAre you saying that NSFW is now allowed site-wide, provided its spoilered?
>>699919<Are you saying that NSFW is now allowed site-wide, provided its spoilered?that was always the case, per rule 10:
<10) All boards except for /siberia/ (and potentially /roulette/) are 'Safe For Work' boards. Pornography should not be posted on them without good reason, and any pornography on these boards should be hidden using the Spoiler Image option. New threads on /siberia/ with pornographic topics should have a Spoiler Image on the opening post. Some kinds of pornographic content are always banned on every board, including /siberia/: cp/loli/jailbait/anything that could possibly interpreted a child, "feral" furry, zoophilia, murder/gore (photographic) and other suitably extreme fetishes.it only specifies that pornography should not be posted without "good reason" - though what those reasons are, are not specified.
presumably not just to goon
I strongly prefer this.
I don't like porn on non porn boards, it lowers the quality of the entire site.
Porn in non porn boards covers up actual conversation and threads.
Is this due to EU age verification bullshit?
>>700053
>to be completely honest, this was actually one of the reasons i started namefagging and spamming hentai gifs, to accelerate and force the mods moralfaggy hands on this issue, after the passing of the arbitrary, contrived, and moralfaggoted rule 10.
By making people more sympathetic to moralfaggoted overmoderation? Good job retard.
>>700070
The fact is you are an offputting retard nobody wants around. Maybe next time you decide to fight against some rule, dont go out of your way to become justification for its existence.
>>700075
Then do us a favour and delete the fucking guro spam from this thread.
If you want to fight against morafaggotry, make a thread on loli or furry or whatever topic, properly label it, spoiler it, so that when mods delete it it actually is unjustified overmoderation. Smearing your shit all over /siberia/ makes the mod actions look better, not worse.
>>700077The mods clearly believe that some drawings are more moral than others.
>>700077lol get fucked pervert
>>700081Let people enjoy things. Frankly even zoo isnt illegal, so I fail to see reason why it should be arbitrarily banned.
>>699709URAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>699709hentai thread still isn't spoilered, many posts aren't
>>700084>le let people enjoy things!stfu shitlib
>>700120The liberalism is banning stuff like feral. There is no purpose for that other than morality, which is an inherently liberal and bourgoise construct.
Doesn't even hold water if you humor morality aspect, because the whole reason that term exists is to emphasize that a sophont doesn't necessarily have to be human shaped. The wording on rule 10 seems to even acknowledge this by listing it as seperate from zoophilia, yet they put this unpopular-from-round-one rule in anyway.
What mod needs to be kicked from the team to fix this?
>>700125Why cant you accept its not a moral judgement but rather an arbitrary decision? Some people dont want to see shit like this and thats fine. Not everything is a moral crusade you schizo
>>700125i think that the last wave of volunteer was mostly made up of soyjak trolls, and just haven't been noticed yet.
>>700128that is what spoilering is for, and now that it is mandatory there is every less reason for the rule.
>>700128>Some people dont want to see shit like this and thats fine.That's what the blanket rule to spoil nswf images is for. If you want it gradiental then require content warnings like how people do on fedi.
(not required on some activitypub instances but people do it out of politeness)If it's truely arbitrary then that makes it more odd that it's insisted upon.
>>700128I just want to second what the other posters said, as long as it is spoiled nobody has to see it, nobody is bothered, everyone is happy. Except moralfaggots who seeth over other people seeing it.
This is literally fascism.
I've noticed when I post loli or beast hentai spoilered, it usually doesn't get removed even though it's against the rules, this likelihood will now only increase due to mandatory spoilering. how will the moderators address this? 🤔
>>700236once again fascism is closely linked to psychosexual disorders and excessive porn usage
>>700278If they implement an auto-unspoil option that wouldn't be much of an issue.
>>700292Well I guess they'll have to get on that then. 🤭
>>699777bro if it would get you fired at work, don't post it unspoilered. be glad you can post that stuff at all on here. stop acting like a baby just because your intended audience has to click once to see it
>>700290>>700236both liberal midwits
>>700405But i work at the loli doujin factory?
>>700114press report anon
>>700454Do you work night shift or day shift?
>>700609Both, they just pump me full of steroids and amphetamines to keep me awake and working and if i stop they say they’ll shoot a family member
>>700619You just need to kill your whole family so that threat won't work on you. They may just make you a supervisor
>>700623How? i have no time, i’m typing this as i’m working - they say if i don’t print 50 loli futa mangas in the next half hour they’ll start breaking toes
Good change. Support.
>>700915Context dependent really, if it'd be rating:questionable on e621 then you should probably spoil it.
remember everyone, this banger policy happened during the bird hedgehog administration!
>>700915feet
>>699876Wish granted, kind of. Here's a mediocre script to unspoiler images. Just paste it into your browser's console.
(function() {
let links = document.getElementsByTagName("a");
for (let i = 0; i < links.length; i++) {
let link = links[i];
if (
link.href &&
link.href.match(/siberia\/src/) &&
link.children.length == 1 &&
link.children[0].tagName == 'IMG' &&
link.children[0].src.match('/static/spoiler_alunya.png$')
) {
link.children[0].src = link.href;
}
}
})()
>>700966Probably should have saved these for the hentai thread. Oh well, here's version two of the script. Now with aspect ratio preservation.
Once again, just press F12 and paste it in the console. Feel free to ask ChatGPT for a review if your a non programmer that doesn't trust my code.
(function() {
const links = document.getElementsByTagName("a");
for (let i = 0; i < links.length; i++) {
const link = links[i];
if (
link.href &&
link.href.match(/(\.png|\.jpg|\.jpeg|\.webp)$/) &&
link.children.length == 1 &&
link.children[0].tagName == 'IMG' &&
link.children[0].src.match('/static/spoiler_alunya.png$')
) {
const image = link.children[0];
image.src = link.href;
function resize(event) {
const width = image.naturalWidth;
const height = image.naturalHeight;
const scale = Math.min(255/width, 255/height);
image.style.width = width*scale + 'px';
image.style.height = height*scale + 'px';
image.removeEventListener('load', resize)
}
image.addEventListener('load', resize);
}
}
})();
This is such a retarded decision.
1) This is si/b/eria and OPs are already spoilered, what more do you fuckers want?
2) This just means fewer people will be posting or opening spoilered images since it's easy to post all sorts of vile shit
3) Not even into the porn but this ruins the entire point of 'free' imageboard posting, although that's been dead here long before this to be fair.
Just adjust the JS to have an option that reveals spoilered thumbnails on selection, so people can view the thumbnails without needing to open a full res of someone's rectum when checking a spoilered image.
>>699709>compliance reasonsThank you r/socialism, Hiromoot would be proud of your cucking out.
>>699926Rule 10 has been changed because that was not the case before. The spoiling of pornographic OPs was also a change that didn't previously exist until a (relatively) recent time ago.
>inb4 muh overboardThat's the point of /sfw/
>>701738i assume this is in response to a bunch of european nations passing laws censoring porn and mandating age verification
>>701738As someone that uses the porn threads regularly, I like this change. Better loading times and less ammo for complainers. This could be due to me using activitypub for a few years soethe idea of a content warning feild is maundane to me. Then again I often see newcomers over there froth at the mouth that they need to toggle a setting to auto-expand them, or that porn, vent and food posts are slightly less space efficient as a result of having a headline.
>>699709It this same vein, it'd be neat if we had a way to make a line of text collapsable. Like we have
this but it takes the same amount of space. I sometimes run tests on LLMs and just put it in a code block to indicate that it is AI generated, but that puts it in a pre tag which disables wrapping–good for actual code, but for paragraphs that's pain. If we had a way to put a line in a details / summary tag that would be a godsend.
>>701881>It this same vein, it'd be neat if we had a way to make a line of text collapsable. Like we have this but it takes the same amount of space. I sometimes run tests on LLMs and just put it in a code block to indicate that it is AI generated, but that puts it in a pre tag which disables wrapping–good for actual code, but for paragraphs that's pain. If we had a way to put a line in a details / summary tag that would be a godsend.take it to the tech feedback thread in meta
>>701957this one is the exception
>>701738I can't speak for all threads, but the I believe the hentai thread and the "post porn" thread are free of vile shit and shock images.
Jesus Christ. RIP 420chan
>>700915 Loli, reported.
>>700948 Loli, reported
>>701294 Illegal content, Asuka is 14 years old.
>>702293 This should be spoiled.
we need a seperate nsfw thread already
>>705817i meant board, in retard mode
>bans porn
>doesn't ban nazis
based moralistic rules
>>706330The Modocracy has its priorities, doesn't it?
>>705817just have a separate site atp
>>706401We just need to murder and cannibalize the mods and take this one back from the glowies, sharty spies, and hazlite /pol/ carpetbaggers.
I really like what ya did here pal.
>>705639uygha that make no sense facsists in europa love their marble bust clitties
>>708402In america they put you in prison for them.
>>708404sus pdf-coded taste
>>7017381 month later and I was right. All the porn threads are dead and half the spoilered pics are random garbage
>>708848Like I said 2 months earlier its over. Reactionary scum inhabiting this chan won and now we have no "degeneracy" but instead very low tier discussion about idpol and latest liberal nationalism.
>>710056The mods are literally unilaterally banning things just because they think it's "unsightly" (their words.) I think this place has become worse than r/socialism.
>>710087My eyes see this clearly, my mind should not. Good mod work.
The creepy ugly dude with the blue Hawaiian shirt… I'm tired of seeing his face whenever I visit this board. Who is that and why do we have to look at him making that retarded face?
Change it. Spoiler it. Remove it. Whoever thought it was "cool" or something to post that with those teeth? Wrong.
I don't want to see that guy here anymore.
>>710087Yeah, I just had this total FAGGOT FUCKFACE of a mod ban me for 14d, 'not touching enough grass' just because I outsmarted him and made him look like the embarrassing douche he is.
What a sore loser. Is that all the mods? Is that why those guys made their own offshoot of this site? Because up until today this site was always pretty cool. Some of the pretentious communism nerds suck, but they can't just remove threads when you make fun of them for calling everything "bourgeois".
Maybe once they lose their virginity and/or 200 lbs they will learn to do their jobs. Meaning "less is more" when it comes to bans.
Fucking faggots.
>>710854I think that's the admin's avatar, she's used it for a thread or two. It's from a movie or smth idk.
Add an option to unspoiler all images you prudish fucks
Yea, include nightmare mode
>>710087hot take
as bad as /r/socialism was about idpol and glow, that's not as bad as the reactionary socialists we have here now
>>713378The two polarities are "Clapping is ableist" vs. "Yeah, I'm totally a socialist here on stupidpol. Socialism is when there's a welfare state and I can still proselytize about how black people are innately stupid; this isn't racist btw! Check out this 4chan graph!"
Both of these are cancerous garbage and both of these would have Marx rolling over in his grave. That this dichotomy is the dominant strain indicates something is gravely wrong with the Left's current foundational grasp of things.
>>701294I've made a version three. Now images are only loaded when they're moused over. This should lighten the bandwidth load.
I wrote this version because marking an image as a spoiler prevents thumbnail generation. Hence I
have to download the entire image to auto unspoiler it.
(function() {
const links = document.getElementsByTagName("a");
for (let i = 0; i < links.length; i++) {
const link = links[i];
if (
link.href &&
link.href.match(/(\.png|\.jpg|\.jpeg|\.webp)$/) &&
link.children.length == 1 &&
link.children[0].tagName == 'IMG' &&
link.children[0].src.match('/static/spoiler_alunya.png$')
) {
const image = link.children[0];
function unspoiler(event) {
image.src = link.href;
function resize(event) {
const width = image.naturalWidth;
const height = image.naturalHeight;
const scale = Math.min(255/width, 255/height);
image.style.width = width*scale + 'px';
image.style.height = height*scale + 'px';
image.removeEventListener('load', resize)
}
image.addEventListener('load', resize);
image.removeEventListener('mouseover', unspoiler);
}
image.addEventListener('mouseover', unspoiler);
}
}
})(); >>713999>Now images are only loaded when they're moused overso they're effectively still spoiled? kek
Since the heart of the problem lies server side (spoiled images not serving the thumbnails) might be better to request a new feature on the leftypol repo to
1. create a new type of spoiler called NSFW
2. a new option to automatically un-spoil nsfw spoilers, by replacing the new spoiler image with the thumbnail
https://forgejo.leftypol.org/leftypol/leftypol >>714314>might be better to request a new feature on the leftypol repo this, I agree its annoying, using a porn thread is pure pain
>>713403And the "clapping is ablist" side didn't even exist to begin with, both percieved sides were just the latter.
So if the only solution is to be more ruthless than CIA then why dont we skin these faggot MODS alive and establish proletarian democracy.
>>714314having different types of spoilers has been something we could have used for a long time tbh
honestly we definitely use the feature more for NSFW than actual spoilers
>>713999Very interesting. Is it possible to do such a hover-over-image to unspoiler with CSS? Or is it JS exclusively?
Why don't you just make them… wait in hell??
>>717919We already are in jannycracy hell of sorts.
It's woke. It matters.
Unique IPs: 71