For compliance reasons, the moderation team has voted to MANDATE spoilering all NSFW images, site-wide.
This takes effect as of now, August 16, 2025. Please take note.
>>699919<Are you saying that NSFW is now allowed site-wide, provided its spoilered?that was always the case, per rule 10:
<10) All boards except for /siberia/ (and potentially /roulette/) are 'Safe For Work' boards. Pornography should not be posted on them without good reason, and any pornography on these boards should be hidden using the Spoiler Image option. New threads on /siberia/ with pornographic topics should have a Spoiler Image on the opening post. Some kinds of pornographic content are always banned on every board, including /siberia/: cp/loli/jailbait/anything that could possibly interpreted a child, "feral" furry, zoophilia, murder/gore (photographic) and other suitably extreme fetishes.it only specifies that pornography should not be posted without "good reason" - though what those reasons are, are not specified.
presumably not just to goon
>>700120The liberalism is banning stuff like feral. There is no purpose for that other than morality, which is an inherently liberal and bourgoise construct.
Doesn't even hold water if you humor morality aspect, because the whole reason that term exists is to emphasize that a sophont doesn't necessarily have to be human shaped. The wording on rule 10 seems to even acknowledge this by listing it as seperate from zoophilia, yet they put this unpopular-from-round-one rule in anyway.
What mod needs to be kicked from the team to fix this?
>>700125i think that the last wave of volunteer was mostly made up of soyjak trolls, and just haven't been noticed yet.
>>700128that is what spoilering is for, and now that it is mandatory there is every less reason for the rule.
>>700128>Some people dont want to see shit like this and thats fine.That's what the blanket rule to spoil nswf images is for. If you want it gradiental then require content warnings like how people do on fedi.
(not required on some activitypub instances but people do it out of politeness)If it's truely arbitrary then that makes it more odd that it's insisted upon.
remember everyone, this banger policy happened during the bird hedgehog administration!
>>700915feet
>>699876Wish granted, kind of. Here's a mediocre script to unspoiler images. Just paste it into your browser's console.
(function() {
let links = document.getElementsByTagName("a");
for (let i = 0; i < links.length; i++) {
let link = links[i];
if (
link.href &&
link.href.match(/siberia\/src/) &&
link.children.length == 1 &&
link.children[0].tagName == 'IMG' &&
link.children[0].src.match('/static/spoiler_alunya.png$')
) {
link.children[0].src = link.href;
}
}
})()
>>700966Probably should have saved these for the hentai thread. Oh well, here's version two of the script. Now with aspect ratio preservation.
Once again, just press F12 and paste it in the console. Feel free to ask ChatGPT for a review if your a non programmer that doesn't trust my code.
(function() {
const links = document.getElementsByTagName("a");
for (let i = 0; i < links.length; i++) {
const link = links[i];
if (
link.href &&
link.href.match(/(\.png|\.jpg|\.jpeg|\.webp)$/) &&
link.children.length == 1 &&
link.children[0].tagName == 'IMG' &&
link.children[0].src.match('/static/spoiler_alunya.png$')
) {
const image = link.children[0];
image.src = link.href;
function resize(event) {
const width = image.naturalWidth;
const height = image.naturalHeight;
const scale = Math.min(255/width, 255/height);
image.style.width = width*scale + 'px';
image.style.height = height*scale + 'px';
image.removeEventListener('load', resize)
}
image.addEventListener('load', resize);
}
}
})();
This is such a retarded decision.
1) This is si/b/eria and OPs are already spoilered, what more do you fuckers want?
2) This just means fewer people will be posting or opening spoilered images since it's easy to post all sorts of vile shit
3) Not even into the porn but this ruins the entire point of 'free' imageboard posting, although that's been dead here long before this to be fair.
Just adjust the JS to have an option that reveals spoilered thumbnails on selection, so people can view the thumbnails without needing to open a full res of someone's rectum when checking a spoilered image.
>>699709>compliance reasonsThank you r/socialism, Hiromoot would be proud of your cucking out.
>>699926Rule 10 has been changed because that was not the case before. The spoiling of pornographic OPs was also a change that didn't previously exist until a (relatively) recent time ago.
>inb4 muh overboardThat's the point of /sfw/
>>701738As someone that uses the porn threads regularly, I like this change. Better loading times and less ammo for complainers. This could be due to me using activitypub for a few years soethe idea of a content warning feild is maundane to me. Then again I often see newcomers over there froth at the mouth that they need to toggle a setting to auto-expand them, or that porn, vent and food posts are slightly less space efficient as a result of having a headline.
>>699709It this same vein, it'd be neat if we had a way to make a line of text collapsable. Like we have
this but it takes the same amount of space. I sometimes run tests on LLMs and just put it in a code block to indicate that it is AI generated, but that puts it in a pre tag which disables wrapping–good for actual code, but for paragraphs that's pain. If we had a way to put a line in a details / summary tag that would be a godsend.
Unique IPs: 45