/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>771157
That’s how a lot of action movies are.
Walker Texas Ranger and the like

It’s a subconscious reinforcement for mindless procreation

>>771161
this

>>771157
For one, a character needs motivations. Saving your loved ones is an obvious motivation. For two, fictions are wish-fulfillment. For three, no not all guys are incels. What would a movie for incels even be lmao. Even the most incel-core movie of all time he still gets a girl because incels want a girlfriend. The movie let's you live getting a girlfriend vicariously just like it lets you live doing cool action stuff.

I mean, john wick is about revenge

This is why I prefer pornography

>>771157
Because movies made for a male audience generally try to appeal to a male audience.

Most action movies show Americans as the "heroes" and foreign countries like Russia or China as villains, thus showing the directors' twisted and imperialistic worldview

>>771164
>For one, a character needs motivations.
glory and power drive plenty of earlier and later films too u know? So why is modern cinema the weird exception catering everything to breeders?
>>771164
>fictions are wish-fulfillment.
debatable
> no not all guys are incels.
Correct, just 50–70% of guys are single.
>>771165
lol dog was basically his wife, remember?
>>771168
trying and failing

>>771173
>Most modern action movies show Americans as the remorseful "antiheroes"
fixed
also remember proles, always be willing to die for the booj

>>771179
This. The more common form of action movie are the remorseful “antiheroes”
Usually guys who got innocent bystanders killed from an espionage missions

>>771179
Peter prole

>>771157
> most dudes are bitchless or avoiding that family faggot shit?
Not true. Roughly 75–85% of adults have at least one child by the end of their reproductive years. In high-income countries (like the U.S., Western Europe, Japan): The share is lower, typically around 65–80%, but still a majority. Isolating it to males in high income countries, roughly 60–75% of them eventually have at least one biological child attributed to them.

Even if this number drops significantly, it will likely remain a sizeable percentage of the population. Even people who regret having kids or have kids on accident usually love their families and friends and would do something to save them, which is why fiction frames these scenarios so commonly. Why might certain people feel alienated by others having loved ones?

and therefore moid genocide

It's our privilege, duh

>>771174
>glory and power
gay as shit

>>771157
All larger hollywood tropes use the same storytelling format to maximize profit. You wont find anything creative/original from big production films. Just same story with different aesthetics plastered on it.

>>771438
<having aspirations = poopy doopy
anon, are you alright?

>>771416
Right. 75-85% still means 1 in 4 dudes dies without crotch goblins. Your "majority love their accidents" doesn't change that the majority fiction jerks off to that "sacrifice" because non-breeders exist as contrast. Cope harder, breeder.

>>771438
side character syndrome