>>771775>photoshopDoes anyone actually consider images made in photoshop to be art? Does anyone actually consider CGI to be art? And isn't CGI usually made by humans, like character models and environments and such, and it's just like some kind of software engine that animates all? So, those things might be low quality or whatever, but they're still made by humans, and not churned out by an algorithm, so they're not the same.
I dunno, dawg, it's like… I don't care. AI is just for lazy people, at some point it loses its novelty, so I don't see the appeal of making cookie-cutter images when I could git gud at drawing instead. It's like, maybe a drum kit can make good beats, right? And you can use those beats to make tracks to rap over, right? And that's fine and everything because it serves its purpose, but why are we even comparing that to playing drums? They're not even the same thing, so it's like, they shouldn't even be directly compared.
Why are sloppers so desperate to be acknowledged as artists anyway? The barrier to entry is so low, that if you can make it appealing to use AI without any additional effort, like, it just produces exactly what you want with a specific prompt, then suddenly everyone will be an artist and art will lose its economic value, which will shift the "art meta" to something similar to a social media popularity contest, where only the most popular memeshit "art" ever gets noticed, much less consumed by anyone.
So, like, this whole "debate" is fucking gay already. It's like, go ahead and make your slop, I don't care, and really, I never cared, it's just an incredibly dumb conversation at this point, and all so you can, what exactly? Make media at a faster pace and therefore somehow be more competitive? You don't care about art, you just want legitimacy so you can aspire toward a beneficial economic outcome for yourself.