I heard some interesting takes on Napoleon here. I once made a thread on the main board asking who was the best head of state in history and I was expecting answers like Mao or Castro or Lenin or whatever but the first answer I got was Napoleon. If you ask me as a pre-Marxist figure Napoleon did more bad than good, he was an imperialist, he was a monarchist who betrayed the French Revolution, he killed 80,000 Haitians in an attempt to restore slavery, he killed 2,100 prisoners in Jaffa, and he got rid of Women’s rights. However there is some positive things he did because he Emaciated the Jews, reduced feudalism around Europe, and built infrastructure. However he still did more bad than good but I would still oppose tearing down statues of him.
>>773223>he was a monarchist who betrayed the French Revolutionlol libs btfo
>>773233Okay so you think conservatives winning just because liberals lose? What an idiot.
>>773237Yeah I hate Kamala but I’m not gonna celebrate Trump winning because she lost are you crazy?!?!
He was the scourge of anglos and germanoids, so net good
70% good 30% bad
yes
when you look up napoleon on duckduckgo the logo of the site changes
material explanation?
Because of him the American were liberated and he also gave essential support for the implementation of the 1st civil code.
70% good 30% bad
>>773223>he Emaciated the JewsKek
>>773411Fuck I meant to say "Emancipated." Fuck predictive text!
scourge of the english
I wouldn't trust a 'socialist' who says they like Napoleon. He was a conservative who destroyed the French Revolution, one of the most evil people in history.
>>774032Already destroyed by the termidorians when they killed Robespierre and dismantled it, Which is the reason Napoleon could even become ruler in the first place
>>774032I don’t “Like” Napoleon but he is an important historical figure and the greatest example of Bonaparteism
Why the fuck are people in the thread confusing liberals and conservatives from the 19th century with those from the 21st century (which are all liberal anyway)?
>>773253more like 90% bad 10% good
basically the good part was being militarily competent enough to fuck up all european monarchies and usher in the new social order faster than it would have without him humiliating all the royal heads and showing an alternative was possible across europe, implementing some rational lib law system
for everything else than military matters, he was a corrupt power hungry bastard, shit at diplomacy, giving it all to the porkies economically and going back toward reaction on all other front, that sacrificed the strength of the revolution and millions of french for his own megalomaniac designs
>>774032I'm sorry but you will never truly understand jefatura if the VVORLD SPIRIT filters you, consider using another flag.
>>773223It depends who you ask. Here in Italy he has a slight positive bent to him because he made the first national italian state, kicked out our local ancien regime and modernized our legal system
Unique IPs: 20