Who cleans toilets under communism?
workers. but i assume that at this rate by communism no one will need to clean toilets anymore
flood dontknow2format
Did you all know in a Touhou fan poll Koishi was voted as the most popular character in the series? Even above well known favorites like Cirno, Reimu, Marisa and the Scarlet sisters.
>>774117Workers clean toilets for money under capitalism, workers under communism would clean toilets for nothing. Is there any incentive to clean a toilet if you can choose another kind of work?
>>774115Reactionary slaves
>>774120Does it mean your mother cleans the toilets? Like, she's pretty reactionary toward my cock
>>774119>Is there any incentive to clean a toilet if you can choose another kind of work?Having the toilets clean? What kind of retarded question is that. If no one takes the worl they will be dirty and people generally don't like living like that
janitors
/thread
/board
/website
/internet
>>774124No one would like to be a janitor
>>774125why not? its the same as any other kind of labour
People will clean their own toilets. Or a state industrial factory will put in the research and development to create self-cleaning toilets, but people would clean them their-selves until then.
>What about public toilets?
If you break it, you clean it, or it will be general engineer work.
>>774122You'd clean a toilet only if it was the toilet in your bath. No one would clean a toilet in, for instance, a shopping mall just cuz they wanna keep it clean. Only the owner would like to, but there's no private property under communism, so public toilets would be dirty as fuck
>>774128Well, it would be the people's mall toilets, so the people would clean them, just like people clean their own house
>>774129I would rather work as a jannitor than a cook or a waiter
>>774128cleaning toilets would be a sport, and you would get a medal for cleaning the most toilets in a month, a year, etc
>>774130>I would rather work as a jannitor than a cook or a waiterYou're weird
>Well, it would be the people's mall toilets, so the people would clean them, just like people clean their own houseSounds very naive
>>774132>You're weirdI have less issues with dirtiness and bad odors (i can't smell very well) than most people. Waiter is a very social job, jannitor no
>Sounds very naiveIt's named Public propierty for a reason. Just like how the bourgeois cares for its property the people will care for their things
>>774128in some asian countries, its the students / employees responsibility to clean up their common living space, and they do it together/in turn at some predetermined times. In belarus, citizens have some civic duty once a month or something and must help maintaining public parks and shit
also soon, robots
i'd do it tbh
better than my current job
>>774121>Does it mean your mother cleans the toilets? Like, she's pretty reactionary toward my cockShe was cremated, where are you gonna look for the ashes now?
>>774128by that same logic no one would work either
>>774150Yes? Why would anyone work under communism?
>>774139>citizens have some civic duty once a month or something and must help maintaining public parksSo thats just slavery and using labor without compensation.
>>774152Belorusia is a worker's state so no
>>774154And how does that excuse them from using forced-labor?
The scat fetishist
the people who like cleaning
just take a shower bro haha
the implication being that you're are would be the toilet under the communism
Full body hazmat suit would mean cleaning toilet would be safe and the janitor would not suffer from breathing in bad smells and shit like that.
Also eliminating unpleasant labor would be among the highest priorities under communism.
Also communist society would be so glorious and heavenly that people would gladly volunteer to do unpleasant labor and they will be hailed as heroes.
>>774139They do it involuntarily, which is not good at all
>>774154No it's fucking not
Cleaning stuff has been my dream job since I was a kid and stopped pursuing it after I learned its considered humilliating in capitalist society, but seeing a filthy fucking mess and turning into a shiny spot of clean beauty is just too satisfying to me.
That, garbage collector and fish monger was all I wanted to be and instead I'm stuck being an artist which is shit I unironically dont give a shit about compared to the other 3 things.
>>774156There are only a few such people… not enough to clean every toilet on Earth
>>774160>Full body hazmat suit would mean cleaning toilet would be safe and the janitor would not suffer from breathing in bad smells and shit like that. Have you god damn ever worn hazmat? It's insufferable and doesn't make this work any better
>Also eliminating unpleasant labor would be among the highest priorities under communism. >Also communist society would be so glorious and heavenly that people would gladly volunteer to do unpleasant labor and they will be hailed as heroes.And why is communism not utopia then?
>>774115people whose highest passion is to clean toilets
Immigrants. Minorities. Disabled people.
Why not clean your own toilet?
I'm already a janitor. So I guess I would.
>>774115Im a cleaner at my local shopping centre at night. It's eerily peaceful, you also don't have people watching your every move. Cleaning toilets ain't that bad, easy money even though the pay ain't that good, people are against it because it doesn't have status.
>>774115>>774119While there's no definitive answer and this is exactly the kind of "will there be ice cream under communism?" timewasting question that makes you realize that for most "communists" it's just secular heaven instead of something they're seriously committed to building (or they'd be asking "how the fuck do you organize people?" and reading management textbooks), it does not take a great leap of imagination to say: The people who use them, or otherwise a distributed responsibility across the workforce.
(There are disadvantages here in terms of labor efficiency, but such visions are fairly common.)
also this
>>774194Raise the social status of a position and it doesn't matter how materially unpleasant it is.
You already clean toilets in your house willingly.
Someone starting out
children of the Bourgeoisie
>>774174>every toilethygiene will be collectivized so there will be much less bathrooms (showers and toilets)
you clean toilets in the morning then clean the dishes at lunch then cook my dinner at dinner time then smoke weed at evening then go to sleep and jerk off
>>774332Lines for food weren't a cool thing. But this… just why? Why the fuck do you want to have lines for bathrooms?
>>774335why would there need to be lines for toilets? 5 toilets are enough for quite some people. people usually shower at the same hour, this is resolved by communal showers. you don't have to have invidual showers
>>774340Five toilets are bourgeois excesses
>>774115>Who cleans toilets under communism?everyone by lottery like jury duty
>>774115I'd clean toilets with a toothbrush if you gave me 250,000 a year for it. to extend that logic, under capitalism, assuming we just don't have bots doing it, I'd do it in exchange for my fair share of dick and ego stroking + all the ammenities I can enjoy like housing and healthcare and whatever.
basically I deserve (genuine) headpats alongside the ability to live a comfortable and prosperous existence. this is what I don't have under capitalism, which is why I dislike it, and it has nothing to do with the prestige or lack thereof of whatever position I occupy.
Pretty sure the answer is everyone
>>774375Is that your check stub? You have 3 kids?
>>774429not my paystub, but a reminder why I didn't have kids desu.
>>774431Also that guys only earning slightly above federal minimum wage. He must live in a red state.
Me, so other comrades dont have to. I can do any work for my comrades <3
Unique IPs: 33