What exactly is so bad about colonization?
I find it funny that "anti-imperialists" (aka anti-colonists) simp russia and china, countries founded on colonialism.
nothing is bad. rape, for example, is good.
>>774555this is true. even marx laughed at moralists at their face while having a mouth full of ham and farting afterwards.
colonialism was just treatlerism of the early modern era
>slaves in haiti dying so europeans can have sugar
>slaves in the congo dying so americans can have videogames
>>774549Isn't literally every country founded on colonialism in that sense
>>774628what's your point?
>>774638He is saying that that is poin you are making. You believe demand creates supply or that supply is a function of demand
>>7746401) i'm not
>>7746112) "slaves in haiti died so europeans could have sugar" is a very uncontroversial statement and does not imply that "demand creates supply" as a general rule.
>>774548Study Haiti for an extreme case.
>show up on island>genocide natives>bring slaves there>some of the worst working conditions, even for slaves, lots of lost limbs and burns from the sugar processing>they revolt>colonizers BTFO>the slave are now the natives because the original natives are dead>island isolation, sanctions, embargoes, and forced reparations make you unable to thrive>US invades and takes over your central bank, steals the gold, executes revolutionaries, forces corvee labor>US eventually gets bored and fucks off, but keeps couping you periodically and funding warlords>even 220 years after your revolution you basically are unable to get off the ground economically you didnt need a whole thread for us to grant you permission to date a yt boi/girl.
GO AHEAD
>>774548Because it skews favour to the benefit of the colonizers, think of black and Asian men, they're still a niche fetish most of the time.
>>774701yeah read the book full of boring shit like statistics of french railroads
>>774712Its called a popular outline cause its even understood by lumpenproles now read.