/siberia/ - Off-topic

if you're gonna be a schizo at least have something interesting to say

>>780307

you must be gravely offended if you must resort to attempting to threaten and control people's minds by using psychiatry against them.

>>780308
YOUR FAVORITE STATUE NO LONGER LOVES YOU

>>780310
I just think, the reason people are so offended by things like this is because look at any direction you go in, there's communism, liberalism, neo-liberalism and globalism. They all teach and expect you to unconditionally accept and be completely open to everybody no matter what. And I think nowadays, it's also because unregulated capitalism is global world spanning now, so there's great profit incentive to adopt these beliefs.

But what I wrote here could be considered as simply being philosophy or something and doesn't have to be completely taken as fact. But instead, it just shows how much freedom we have and how open our society is when all curiosity is met with the boot of the oppressor and you're immediately silence with the threat of psychiatry.

But that being said, it's not that weird what I said, because I just looked up the "spam flooding detection" feature on leftypol, and apparently it's often because of "bots" but, with how they use "bots" here, they pretty much literally mean actual people. And yet, that's socially acceptable somehow?

Can you stop vagueposting and actually say what you think
what do you mean by system,by grid,by rebelling

>>780319
how in-depth do you actually have to be though? it's not rocket science, it goes a little without saying. I struggle to find the words a little and not necessarily the most articulate but the most eloquent. I am not a world class writer here or academic.

I know I will just be ridiculed and laughed at regardless. There is a small spectrum of acceptable opinion and public discourse which is condoned or even allowed, and sure very lively debate can be encouraged within the spectrum but it's still very limiting. We almost have thought crimes, doublethink.

Here is the inside mainframe of a computer next to a picture looking down at an ancient city. Is further conjecture really necessary?

I think what you're asking (in particular out of everyone else) is you are expecting me to go in depth and make a detailed assessment on par with academia (because, I shouldn't think freely on my own so much; and instead get gridlocked by institutional biases) about the conjecture and obvious relationship between society serving or acting as the basis of an elaborate and grand complex system, and how that is also comparable to a computer program. Since computer programs rely on systems in essence as well. Correct me if I am wrong

I appreciate not calling me schizo though I guess and trying to threaten me with coercion the likes of, oh, I don't know, I deserve to be locked up in an institution against my will.


This was mostly a joke anyway, and I was just trying to have fun. It's a sad state of affairs that philosophy is so dejected by double think and thought policing.

>>780522
comparing society to a computer network isn't very weird I'm gonna be honest with you,both are engineered by groups of individual,one is the entire collective over millennia,second is a group of engineers over decades
if you want to compare city architecture to computer architecture,that's also self-evident,both try to maximize space (can't have a wall the size of a continent to protect it that would be dumb),died with the rise of artillery and canons in particular,and now cars

if you didn't waste 90% of your post crying about the possibility of not being taken seriously (or worse,bullied ! on an anonymous forum !!!) maybe you could actually say what the fuck you are actually thinking,and NO it does not go without saying,dunning-krueger effect in action.