[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1778201975593.mp4 (1021.78 KB, 640x480, Niceville.mp4)

 

Obviously we don’t want Chuds to shoot up schools but we also don’t want the government to take away our guns and oppress us. I think that the solution is healthcare and better living conditions because then the Chuds who do mass shootings would not be Chuds and therefore don’t do mass shootings.

>>780456
>we also don’t want the government to take away our guns and oppress us
Yes we do.
This is not a problem in other countries. It's the guns. You don't even have to connect the dots, the dots are overlapping. The only reason we don't implement the obvious solution is because of the gun lobby.
<muh freedumbz
Most gun owners are reactionaries/petty bourgs who would attempt a counterrevolution if communists or even socdems ever took control. Imagine an armed nationwide January 6th, backed by porky and the FBI and CIA. So it's actually good to disarm them.
A communist revolution is not going to happen through legal gun ownership, lol. Americans can't even get rid of the current dictator with a massive amount of guns.

the government should take your guns away and oppress you

>>780458
>This is not a problem in other countries. It's the guns. You don't even have to connect the dots, the dots are overlapping. The only reason we don't implement the obvious solution is because of the gun lobby.
You see normally I would agree with yinz but I don't fucking trust the Government right now so I think that guns might have to say. We never tried free healthcare and guns before.
>Most gun owners are reactionaries/petty bourgs who would attempt a counterrevolution if communists or even socdems ever took control.
They are not reactionary permanently, they are reactionary because they never hear an alternative, many of those people you described could be from West Virginia and they could of had grandparents who used their guns to participate in the battle of Blair mountain, political views is not genetic.
>A communist revolution is not going to happen through legal gun ownership
I think it will one day unless there is some type of Gaddafi-style coup

>outlaw discord
>autism screening on the uterus and mandatory abortion if detected
>do the same thing that the government do in that Lobster movie for incels, but instead of turning they into animals if they can't find a girlfriend, you just lobotomize them
>>780458
>This is not a problem in other countries
Correction: this is not a problem in other rich countries. In poor places with stricter gun laws, like Latin America, young people kill themselves outside school.

>>780456
You can't, not if you want the majority of the population to have guns.

>>780460
Unironically yes. Because gun ownership had a logic to it before modern military tech, but civilian gun owners only have enough firepower to go up against other civilian gun-owners so gun ownership only serves violent anti-social tendencies among the masses as a divide and conquer tactic and fosters a siege mentality amongst small private property owners rather than fostering a civil consciousness.

>>780482
I agree. I wasn't being ironic. Civilians should not have access to guns.

>>780479
You’re forgetting about making schooling become less cramped

I also think students should have mandatory pre enrollment psych evaluations.

>>780456
Mass shooting are less worse than gun control of proles. Hate to say it but I agree with ultra liberals (libertarians) on this one.

>>780479
it doesnt happen anywhere else at all, rich or poor. wtf are you talking about.

I think the problem is not mass shootings per se, but who is being targeted. Why not go after SCOTUS, for instance?
I want to be clear that I have no ill intent and would not promote this type of behavior, just asking an idle question. :^)

I’m honestly fine with gun control at this point. I used to be pro 2A, but pro 2A people are overwhelmingly just righties dog whistling. If things ever come to the point of armed revolution, having preexisting access to firearms won’t even make a significant difference. Also most gun owners are irresponsible regards and should not be allowed to own guns.

>>780458
Dammit first post is always best post

>>780622
Are you retarded? The leading cause of death for young people (especially males) in most of the world is gun violence. Do you think fucking grandpa is pulling a .38 out of his cane to kill someone who looked at him the wrong way? In Mexico there is only two places in the whole country to buy guns, in Brazil you can only carry a gun if you prove that your life is in danger (unless you are a cop or a politician). Gun violence is not cause by guns by themselves but by crime and mental sickness.

File: 1778263261679.jpg (428.23 KB, 650x880, Aviano_bomb_suit.jpg)

Give all the teachers fully automatic weapons and body armor.

You gotta come to school dressed like you're in the bomb squad every day.

And give the kids access to bows and arrows. The Archery team will get a medal for each school shooter they stop. They can hunt the school shooters down for sport and the whole thing can be live-streamed so we can place bets on who dies first on some betting website.

>>780648
Males, especially younger males, are expected to be strong and aggressive to a degree. Mix that with poverty, inequality and mental illness and you get an excess of violence.

Make it so right wingers aren't allowed to buy guns and 99% of shootings would not happen lol

>>780648
Wrong.
Gun violence is not the leading cause of death for young people.
It’s more car accidents or domestic abuse

>>780654
A lot of women also use guns improperly.
A lot of mentally I’ll women be killing their husbands and kids but they’re sympathized a lot more.

>>780677
They do but not in the same numbers. It's more related to males being expected to be aggressive and strong all the time.

>>780648
>Do you think fucking grandpa is pulling a .38 out of his cane to kill someone who looked at him the wrong way?

You’d be surprised. Where I live, there’s a lot of boomer males with guns and bad attitude who have a history of domestic and drug abuse

>>780682
So it’s more sociological than innate biological.

File: 1778270895142.png (109.36 KB, 1620x1620, w=1620.png)


>>780684
I wonder what Namefren this is, you removed your name but it glitched and doesn’t say “Anonymous”

>>780698
He said young people, not Brazilians.

>>780700
Newgene

>>780698
that does not prove that it is the leading cause of death

>>780456
Young men are a healthy cohort they don't need healthcare why would that stop them from doing anything.

>>780972
Easier access to sex would probably help more. Or maybe hurt more? I'm not sure. It would most likely do something though.

Why are dead Americans a bad thing?

>>780983
No lives matter

>>780979
Because they are people and I don't want people to be killed. I get that you are doing edgy humor but be real for a moment

>>780972
>young men don’t need healthcare

Who is this boomer?

>>781181
Who are the school shooters too poor to get healthcare? Aren't most of them suburbanites?


Unique IPs: 23

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]