>>782277This is what i'm talking about man. Do you have any proof that i'm wrong? Any observable historical trend to validate your belief that a communist future will be such a hard break over class society that none of the models we have currently will suffice to describe it? Any way to falsify your model of said communist future?
No, you don't. What you have is belief in this unscientific and unquantifiable concept called Alienation, which will be abolished by the destruction of class society, after which Real human relationships (whatever that means) will continue.
This is not real science. This is Hegelianism. This is theology. You might as well talk about Original Sin and Rapture. In fact, the way Marxists talk about a communist society sounds very close to how Revelations talk about New Jerusalem, where we all live in harmony with nature and the water is sweet and there is no conflict and dispute and Death has finally been destroyed.
In contrast, my projections of the future are all rooted in historical-material and scientifically observed trends. The existence of AI is real. The Managerial state is real and will not be undone unless the trends leading to it (liquid urbanism and specialization of labour) is undone, which we see no sign of. Genetic engineering and manipulation is already on the doorstep which proves that posthumanism and planetary-wide eugenics regime are very feasible.
What is unscientific is believing in withering away of the state (every observable trend points to increasing bureaucratization not less), and "real human relationship" which cannot be measured scientifically in the first place.
What i want to say is that if Communists want to take Marxism as a serious wissenschaft, then treat it like a serious science. Only talk about observable and scientifically measurable variables like tendency of the rate of profit to fall or caloric shift and stop navelgazing about alienation, objectification, or other untenable moral utopian claims