>Testing ground -> Nippon
>Put aphrodisiacs in the water supply
>Ban contraception
Also unironically make them work less, allocate resources to encouraging them to start families and to spike their water supplies with aphrodisiacs.
Those Nips will fuck like crazy.
>>783877Just make people optimistic about the future
you'd still have to deal with a legion of hikikomori who will be like
>lol 3DPD
alongside a legion of nihon women who will be like
>lol chigyu bowl ass lookin' mfs cant get none of this
and all that would happen is whitey would come from overseas to capitalize on the horny jap girls + bring his own contraception/get his tubes tied beforehand.
>>783877>remove many women from workplace so they get bored at home and have babies out of boredom>ban goyphones (mobile phones), social media, TV and soap operas, or ban them just for females, so that they are bored at home and want babies out of boredom>limit or ban contraception. Banning might give result of having too many babies. Contraception could also be legal only for couples that already have at least two kids>limit education of women, only send some women (with high potential) to education, most women should be uneducated, at least before they produce two or more babies. Females should first have kids, when they are young, then after this they could study and work (if at all)>ban owning of cats and dogs, females own them instead of kids, they treat them as kids>lower age of marriage and marry young girls, at their puberty or even earlier. The younger the marriage and first pregnancy, the more kids a woman can have>make that at some hours during Saturday or Sunday, the electricity, TV, internet will stop working. This will make people have sex and possibly get pregnant>make that big houses are cheap and make people live in houses in the suburbs or countryside. When people see empty spaces (in the house and outside), they want to fill them with something, for example with children>have people own houses/apartments or rent from the state, because when people rent from private capitalists, they don't have stability, they fear they can be evicted at any time>tax benefits for people with children. Lower property taxes and rent (they need bigger apartments and houses), lower income taxes. Direct payments of money to people with children can be considered but they are not great, they can attract the wrong people to have children, the "bottom" people>allow dads to have some "fun" with his daughter, at night in the bed and during bathing. This is controversial but it would give motivation to males to have children. However, negative effect of this would be that the future husband of this daughter won't get perfect, pure, virgin product. Another similar idea is to allow dads to sell their daughters to males as wives, this would give monetary motivation to have children and daughters. I am not sure though if monetary motivation is a good motivation to have children>stop women from selecting who their husband is>allow rape in marriage. Controversial but could increase fertility rate The methods that I listed really work but you will never see capitalist nation implement them, because they only lie that they want high fertility rate, or even if they wanted, short term profits of capitalists are more important than long term interests of a nation.
https://supercommunism.neocities.org/ why are low fertility rates bad in the first place? maybe we overreproduced beyond our natural ceiling
>>783877Make procreation centrally planned rather than laissez faire
>>783880No, people still fuck, they just use contraception, prostitution and abortion.
>>783886I don't know, I think the laws in Japan are strict to the point that people wouldn't want to risk breaking them for the sake of busting a nut. maybe more people would just resort to the pull out method or mutual masturbation without an exchange of fluids, or tit fucking, ass fucking, or oral. plenty of ways to do sexual things without pregnancy ever being a factor. in fact I think that the banning of contraception would only contribute to a rise in STDs more than the intended effect of increasing the birth rate.
>>783878First post best post. Do this by implementing UBI and other quality of life programs paid for by seizing the bourgs shit. Too easy
You can fix birth rates by destroying the industrial system itself, not by eliminating its symptoms. Feminism, environmental pollution, rising obesity, inceldom, the increase in psychiatric disorders, a youth taking refuge in drugs as a source of hope, and all similar issues stem from the industrial system.
>>783882why cant anyone answer this
>>783894Greedy whites are capitalists to the extent they're willing to sack the future of their own grandchildren for cheaper lawn mowing. Of course hostile races like the jews are more of a threat, but do keep in mind how low most whites are; most are willing to ruin your life for bogus accusations, in vain hope of gaining public or social acceptance.
>How would you solve low fertility rates?
Here is what I would do
<Ban AI chatbots
<Free universal childcare
<Free Housing
<Free healthcare
The reason why nobody is having kids is not because Women have rights but rather because nobody can fucking afford anything In late stage capitalism!
>>783877test tube babies+communal child rearing
>>783901/thread
kill all breeders
>>783882This.
>>783877This sounds low key eugenic
>>783881This is bourgeois.
Why is Leftypol so obsessed with breeding?
Have they become like the right?
moid genocide
>>783882>>783894A non-increasing population limits economic growth (which is fatal with the way the economy currently works). Also, having more elderly than working-age adults stresses the welfare state (even meager stuff like US social security) possibly to the point of collapse.
>>783909Another problem as well is the delayed maturation of prime age adults due to paternalistic laws
>>783877i would fuck everyone.
>>783877there is no "crisis" that stems from low fertility, it does not negatively impact society
>but taking care of muh heckin old peoplepeople who say this believe that UBI should exist
MONEY
>>783943We'll give money to women to have sex with undesirable men.
People fuck more when they are bored, have energy and stability. The solution is literally just make people work less, pay them more and make housing and healthcare much easier to deal with. They'll eventually start fucking for fun and then in no time they'll get a crisis of meaning and make a kid to solve that.
Stop demonizing young peoples sex drives
>>783947nah dude, just pay me enough to live and make housing affordable, I don't know of a single incel that earns a good living and has enough to afford an apartment.
being unfuckable is just not having resources to accomodate another person into your life.
>>783954If only this were true.
In the ghetto, a lot of broke dudes and bitches get laid all the time.
>>783877>>783893A lot of it just seems to be the messaging around childbirth. Girls get told two things at the same time:
>Childbirth is the most painful thing a human being can experience without dying of a pain shock>Hey, go through childbirth! We need it to increase shareholder valueBefore any given girl even knows what affordability is, she is presented this idea. Today, most girls just think
>Uhh… no, I don't want to go through the most painful thing a human being can experienceBut doctors can just get you on anesthesia and that's how most childbirth goes nowadays. Childbirth shouldn't be scary.
There is also liberal messaging like
>You shouldn't have children, think about how much shareholder value you're not generating while you're busy with themThat has to go too, obviously.
Yes, it's true that affordability is a big issue here, but people who do have the money don't have all that many children either unless they're really brainrotted from reading twitter like Elon Musk.
>>783909> which is fatal with the way the economy currently worksSo what you’re telling me is that we can sabotage capitalism by withholding the nut?
>>783877>Ban contraceptionOnly thing needed but I wouldnt want to stop population decline. 8 billion people is too much and this is a humane way to lower it.
I would not solve it. It's not my problem, I don't care about it.
>>783877To increase fetrility rate is easy peasy, just recreate the conditions that made having children a necessity rather than a cost.
>no social security net including retirement>normalized child laborThat Porky would do eagerly however it would also require to
>undo mechanization and automatisation of laborBecause wif the kids cannot find work and earn some bread for the family, it's still not profitable to make them.
The question however is would that be worth it?
Why would I solve them, fertility crisis will damage capitalism
>>783877I don't give a fuck about low fertility rates. Smaller generations -> less competition between workers -> more demand for labor -> more power to the proletariat.
Ever notice how the same talking heads who now bemoan low birth rates are those who used to complain about overpopulation?
Class conscious proles should boycott reproduction as long as this hell world remains a place where life is conditional to exploitation and coercion. Making kids =/= building the resistance to Capital.
<inb4 "but we have to breed the new generation of revolutionaries"
The kids of left wing activists often become politically apathetic or even right wing while a lot of great revolutionaries descended from chuds.
While the contradictions of capital continue to exasperate living conditions they will always sow the seeds of discontent.
>>783909but once again this is only a problem because capitalism requires infinite growth. theres nothing inherently wrong with a low birth rate, we mightve just overexpanded beyond our natural limit
"Aphrodisiacs" don't exist
Unless you mean cocaine
>>784029This.
I remember when overpopulation was a concern on the left before COVID.
That all changed and now the mere suggestion of birth control is decried as “eugenics”
>>783970Careful. In 2026, this is considered fascist in leftist spaces.
>>784040they're both long term issues through the logic of capital, it's just one is of concentration of people in cities, and another is a future lack of labor. economists and bourgeoisie politicians are in charge of solving this stupid contradiction
>>784043Leftypol thinks that bourgeois should be put red by the proletariat.
They don’t understand that the bourgeois want more proles to exploit labor from.
>>784048>put red*out-bred
>>784048well i agree but only if they put me in charge of fucking, if not then i agree with you
Unique IPs: 28