[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!
[ Return / Go to bottom ]

File: 1780025991627.jpg (489.85 KB, 1271x2377, 555543333.jpg)

 

What happened to the chinese century?

File: 1780026266926.jpeg (309.18 KB, 1529x2048, HIA7GQaXsAA9w3s.jpeg)

BWC happened

>we must breed like rats till we cover the earth in concrete

Nope. The ideal world population is something like 500 million. That way everyone can live in a big house with a big yard without encroaching too much into nature.

>>787625
Of course, these 500 million will all (coincidentally) be PURE HWITES. This is leftism

>>787626
Worldwide One Child Policy. Mandatory Veganism. These are non negotiable.

>>787628
And genetic testing for developmental disorders

>>787622
Dengsisters……. not like fucking this nookoooooooooooooooooiooi

>>787626
50 mil africans, 35 mil arabs, 15 mil south asians, 100 mil east asians, 100 mil swarthy europeans, 200 mil pale europeans. Ideal ratio.

>>787641
Oh I forgot about native americans. You know what, take away 15 mil from arabs, 5 from south asians and 20 from pale whites, give 40 mil to natives.

>>787641
>>787642

Why the lower quantity numbers for non European ethnoracial groups?

>>787643
Desirability + phenotype diversity.

>>787645
Yeah sure.
Totally not because of white supremacism.
If you wanted phenotype diversity, you'd up make the quantities all equal in all ethnoracial groups

Also, desirability isn't limited to skin color alone.
If we made all negroid people switch skin tones with Caucasoid but keep the same shapes of facial features, extremities, and even voice patterns, would you consider the now albino negroids desirable?

>>787648
I meant diversity within these broad groups. Like for example you have brunnets, blondes, redheads, brown hair, various eye colours, different complexitions, builds, etc…

>>787650
Why not make a DNA sample database for reference when breeders want to choose their baby

>>787624
>the mexican gooner is into ai slop race fetish
called it

>>787650
swarthy-brown regions are more likely to have green, hazel, brown eyes. Irish people are more likely to have redheads. Almost like 'white' is arbitrary term. Adding 200 million inbred whites isn't guaranteed to add diversity. That's like adding 200 million Arabs or Africans for diversity

Udmurtia people are more likely to be redheads than (literally) 99% of euros

I don't feel so good 'real diversity' bros….

>>787700
There are 220 million dark skinned people in my proposal, and that is not even counting dark skinned east asians. So taken together, you end up with 50:50 dark:bright ratio. Idk what your issue is.

>>787707
Also pale people tan easily, so really you will end up with white skinned people in minority.

>>787707
The issue is those dark hoards are diverse and have ranging features from the Med Levantines to Dark Desi, from the southeast asians to mixed Uzbeks, from north africans to the sub saharan

While alll ypeepo look the same aside from localized traits like redheads w celts.

>>787717
These localized traits are often so rare that there is more in-group diversity then outside diversity, ie the group ("whites") is an obsolete identifier

If you exclude celts from the "whites" group the redhead trait would be just as rare there as it is everywhere else (refer to irish historical exclusion from whitness) Hence to achieve real diversity we overrepresent certain regions rather than entire race (socially constructed meme)

>>787641
The problem here is that since this is obviously a white supremacist determined ratio, the minorities will deem it unfair and have 7 kids per woman to even out the ratio, while whites continue to have very few kids. Eventually you will end up having the same ratio as present day. The correct solution is just a universal one child policy.

>>787622
These are the apocalyptic population figures I've heard so much about? It's not great but not exactly that horrifying. Also the answer is just to accept more immigration anyways

File: 1780054130468.png (47.46 KB, 575x581, downloadfile.png)

>>787731
It's gonna decline to like 680 million by 2100. That's a good thing. It basically means every Chinese will have twice the living space per person compared to day.

File: 1780071655726.mp4 (2.62 MB, 576x698, Niggas be gegging.mp4)

>KKKraKKKas think they can turn everyone into a gay childfree incel gooner like themselves

>>787735
>It's gonna decline to like 680 million by 2100
Assuming nothing else changes, which is moronic. Extrapolating from these figures to even 20 years from now is already shaky.

>>787625
>That way everyone can live in a big house with a big yard
Why do you assume everyone wants this or this is preferably to start with at all?


Unique IPs: 14
[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
[ Return / Go to top /