What does Leftypol think of General Sherman

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1780237341562-0.jpeg (18.81 KB, 384x384, IMG_7298.jpeg)

File: 1780237341562-1.jpeg (211.77 KB, 690x1500, IMG_7299.jpeg)

File: 1780237341562-2.jpeg (139.63 KB, 1242x923, IMG_7300.jpeg)

What does Leftypol think of General Sherman Tomdatinker 31-05-26 14:22:22 No.788511

What do you guys think of General William Tecumseh Sherman?

Anonymous 31-05-26 14:41:47 No.788515

Killed one trillion confederates.
Killed one trillion indians.
Dark woke? Light chud?

Anonymous 31-05-26 14:50:14 No.788519

He was a leading figure of the final stages of America's bourgeois revolution against the slaver class.

Anonymous 31-05-26 15:29:20 No.788526

File: 1780241359688.jpg (381.46 KB, 2048x1406, wzr6c0pdt7s61.jpg)

I like his position on slavers, but his position on the natives is kinda cringe ngl

Tomdatinker 31-05-26 15:44:31 No.788529

>>788515
Trvke
>>788519
Trvke
>>788526
Trvke

Anonymous 01-06-26 01:54:52 No.788658

>>788515
Weren't the Native Americans just as reactionary, if not moreso? They weren't using the land productively so they had to go. Locke and Marx agree!

Anonymous 01-06-26 02:06:23 No.788666

more like general shitman. just kidding no idea who he is y'all

Anonymous 01-06-26 02:10:13 No.788668

>>788666
Based on what Ive heard Sherman was some kind of violent psycho rapist who was also super racist. I dunno if that's true or not. It's just what Ive heard. I also have no idea who he is.

Tomdatinker 01-06-26 02:30:47 No.788676

File: 1780281047053-0.jpg (65.5 KB, 850x400, Black Hawk.jpg)

File: 1780281047053-1.jpg (44.4 KB, 850x400, Sitting Bull.jpg)

>>788658
>Weren't the Native Americans just as reactionary, if not moreso?
No they were not, they were pre-marxist socialists.
>They weren't using the land productively so they had to go.
That is not true, They built Cusco and Tenochtitlan, and I'm sure that the nomadic tribes would have developed at their own pace, you are justifying genocide.
>Locke and Marx agree!
No he did not, he criticized settler colonialism and he drew inspiration from the Iroquois collectivization system.

Anonymous 01-06-26 04:17:21 No.788689

it would've been better if the Union had lost. two weaker burger states at odds with each other would've been better for the world.

Anonymous 01-06-26 05:36:04 No.788700

File: 1780292163772.png (279.97 KB, 2518x1083, chadwillich.png)

>>788511
I'm more of an August Willich guy

Anonymous 01-06-26 06:04:43 No.788706

File: 1780293882140.png (1.5 MB, 1617x1249, August Willich.png)

>>788700
Willich my beloved

Anonymous 01-06-26 06:45:08 No.788719

>>788689
As a general rule, fuck alternate history, but I don't see the Confederacy surviving to the modern age. One scenario I think sounds fun is that they're secession actually ends up leading to a Haiti style slave revolt and Haiti ends up with a powerful ally in the American south. But there's no way to know.

Anonymous 01-06-26 07:43:32 No.788744

>>788689
no it wouldn't, what would have been better, though was if the north was far more vitriolic to the confederates and decimated their troops, their cities, even executing every singular one of their generals

Unique IPs: 12