/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>789065
>straight
>cis
>neurotypical
>non-disabled
these are the baseline, the norm, the standard, and if you aren't those, then I can see how you consider it to be a privilege, but the vast majority of people earn no favorable treatment or better life outcomes on the basis of being all of these things at once.
>white
>woman
these are two gigantic privileges, but being a woman comes with a lot of downsides, so it sort of evens all out in the end.

I'm glad you've taken the time to be more thoughtful and reflective, monkey. I was worried that all you cared about were bananas and sex.

>>789065
I mean sexism is about the substance of it.
>Wouldnt their privlidge override their oppression of being a woman?
It depends on the context.
There are reactionaries who want to retvrn to women being subservient to men, and in that case being a cis straight white woman wouldn't save you.

>>789067
Cis straight people absolutely get favorable treatment over LGBT people in the vast majority of places. Even in tolerant places being LGBT still has a lot of challenges because of the way society is set up.

>>789069
>Cis straight people absolutely get favorable treatment
if "favorable treatment" in this context means that they don't get heckled, assaulted, and marginalized for their sexuality, then yes. but nobody is giving out
<cishet award for the most heterosexual and cisgendered person in the community
or whatever. all you get is an absence of harassment, which is just the absence of negative treatment. that in and of itself isn't positive treatment.

There is no oppression in being a woman, women are the bourgeoisie of gender.

>>789071
They don't get paid to have children, which is the only labor that matters. It's actually the opposite.

>>789071
a woman carried you inside her body for 9 months for free, all while you were draining her life resources, endangering her life. Babies are the real bourgeoisie

>>789065
nope

>>789065
Being, white, cis, straight, neurotypical, non disabled aren't privileges, privileges are solely a class issues, a bourgeois is privileged, no matter what, a prole isn't, no matter what.
Any other interpretation of privilege is ahistorical, reactionnary and capitalistic idpol.

>>789071
In the family, he is the bourgeois, the woman represents the proletariat.
-Engels