Serious question.
Capitalists hate it:
https://varishangout.com/index.php?threads/pixiv-is-banning-certain-types-of-paid-content-to-comply-with-credit-card-companies.1418/The state hates it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Senate_Bill_20The bourgeoisie hates it:
https://www.theunionstar.com/british-vtuber-mimi-yanagi-reportedly-arrested-over-her-own-artwork/Idpol cucks hate it:
https://medium.com/@ossiana.tepfenhart/what-are-they-hiding-60c0dba509c0The reactionaries hate it (See “Gays Against Groomers” to check what I mean)
Just because they want to carve their own niche within this pedophobic zeitgeist doesn’t make them consistent.
It should also be noted that all AES countries have magic age lines below the Hollywood one of 18 (e.g., Cuba at 12), as well as the fact that Joseph Stalin, Sun Yat Sen, Mao Zedong, Evo Morales, etc… got laid with JB (with Evo still being persecuted for having sex with someone below the bourgeois magic age line), as well as that the USSR didn’t have a formal age of consent even under Stalin.
I should also point out that being against bourgeois norms isn’t some trendy Tumblr fad, as the Spartacist League opposes the magic age line (a.k.a., the age of consent, which was literally invented by feudal nobility because they found extramarital sex among peasants too icky) and the communist party of Britain (CPB) used to oppose it as well.
On the top of that, since there’s no evidence that intergenerational intimacy is inherently harmful, therefore this isn’t a materialist question of harm as much as a bourgeois dialectics of moralisms after moralisms that only serve to attack working class men.
So again…
Why is youth-love bad?