You'll often see incel posts in places like this advocating for treating virgins like an underclass and the thing is that they're almost right, but incels are so sex-obsessed and self-absorbed that they fail to realize that their position in society is broader than they think and is described by an ages-old term that everyone already recognizes: LOSERS. You don't have to be a straight man to be a loser, you don't even really have to be a virgin, but all the problems incels have stem from their much more fundamental status as losers.
And losers are 100% an oppressed minority, one where membership may be caused by but ultimately transcends race, gender and such categories. Non-losers don't recognize this because the oppression of losers is almost invisible and gleefully participated in by the losers themselves, so long as they can point out to a bigger loser that makes them feel better about themselves. This is how the lowcow phenomenon comes about. It's like when an alcoholic says that at least he has a job unlike those other filthy parasitic alcoholics, or when a hotep says he's a true African and not a filthy n-word.
And, except maybe for extremely rare cases, you cannot escape being a loser. You can have a job, you can wear the same clothes that the non-losers wear, it doesn't matter, the non-losers can tell you're not one of them. It's something unchangeable in the way you carry yourself, in the way your gaze meets theirs. They identify something in you that they find pathetic and inhuman, and therein the oppression starts. You become a valid target for any behavior, any mockery, any cruelty, no matter how gratuitous it is. You truly understand society only when you see how the most "empathetic" people out there will gleefully join in on ostracizing anyone on whom they detect the loser stink.
The otherwise stupid incel analysis is also correct on one more point: it is a partial relief from loserdom if one is able to attach one's loserdom to identity politics, because many people don't want to be seen as unwoke if it looks like they were ostracizing an autistic person instead of just someone whose lack of sociality is unfortunately not given a name in the DSM-5. The problem is that the incel ultimately participates in his own oppression because he sees himself as special within loserdom when he's not. He can't recognize himself or show solidarity when he witnesses a fat ugly chick or a non-passing trans woman being bullied for loserdom because he just thinks "hmph I bet that bitch still gets a ton of dick anyway" or "transhumanists are always being pushed onto us by the media, they deserve the backlash".
If people were capable of true compassion everyone would recognize this as a real and social problem; but even losers themselves are unable to summon pity for each other, and the most we can get from the rest of humanity are clichés about how "normality" doesn't actually exist or somesuch. There is no salvation and there will never be.
just kidding
Shut up loser
If I didn't want to have my own kids so much a trans woman would literally be the ideal partner.
No one can define what an actual loser is, I suggest these material ones:
Biological loser: virgin (prostitution and rape, doesn't count)
Material loser: either not fully employed or bourgeois.
>>790019It's usually meant as more of an interpersonal thing, status/respect and such. You can be unemployed and not be a loser, e.g. in a generally bad job market almost no one will call you a loser just for not having a job.