[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


 

What is it about machismo culture that makes men on average so much more insecure about having kinks. Like in the appropriate, sex positive online venues you'll see men, women, etc… being open about what they like, but those will still be predominantly female spaces.

Outside of that it seems like men avoid being seen as liking something off-vanilla like it's molten lava, while everyone else is seemingly normal to a bit over-sharing about it.

That’s because women look down on men for having sexual kinks
Men are actually open about sexual kink s but it’s considered rapey

>>790272
it's not machismo, it's generations of feminists shaming male desire.

it was started by a youtuber named rolf

he said that men shouldnt have fetishes because it leads to doxx and rape threats online
his toxic fanbase now roams the internet like the morality police trying to censor people

>>790272
Irony is, men are more diverse in their sexual kinks than women
But women are seen as innocent beautiful angels that can do no wrong, so women are celebrates for having kinks, most of which are just nuanced flavor of vanilla sex.

Men on the other hand have sexual kinks for anthropomorphic machines and whatnot but it’s considered creepy

>>790275
This. And Leftypol especially loves to shit on cishet male sexuality and then wonders why men don’t open up.

>>790275
I feel like right wing, bioessentialist feminism is to some degree part of–or at least symbiotic with–machismo culture. They need eachother to justify themselves.

>>790289
oh please….. this is just like when feminists say that every instance of misandry is just more evidence of patriarchy (even/especially when it's women doing it)

>>790293
I mean, it does reaffirm cisnormative gender roles to be misandrist. Can't start chipping away at patriarchy if you blindly accept and embrace one of it's load bearing principals.

>>790293
Feminists say “misandry isn’t real” and even say that complaining about misandry is reinforcing patriarchy

>>790295
This.
Shaming men for sexual kinks is a powerful motivator for patriarchy

>>790295
Traditional gender norms are much more misogynistic than they are misandric. It's only in modern times that we see that pattern having reversed.

>>790300
So you think that boys being forced to participate in life threatening activities by their elders to prove their worth isnt misandry?

Boys being forced into martial activities or being beaten up for not conforming to macho things isn’t misandrist?


Yes, history shows society was misogynistic but it wasn’t exclusively misogynistic

>>790302
Yes which is why I said it was more misogynistic than misandric.

>>790300
>misandry wasn’t real back then just because women didn’t have rights although men also didn’t have rights either

>>790304
Men obviously had much more rights than women. At least in the western tradition. Rights to property, much more job choice, much more social standing in general, much more acceptable for them to whore around, etc.

>>790303
Define “much more”?
I think there’s a problem with leftists where they tend to downplay dismiss mens woes as a gender

And especially with this talk about “culling male fetuses” to “balance the gender ratio”

>>790305
Only the upper class of men
Most men didn’t have rights
They were paupers and slaves

They were expected to bust their asses for long hours in workshops risking their bodies

>>790306
See my post above. Yes men got sent to die in wars but mass rape of women and girls was one of the big attractions of going to war.

>>790307
Yes it sucked to be a serf but it was still better to be a male one than a female one. As a woman you were more or less property of your father/husband and still had to work the fields all day

>>790308
Boys and young men were raped too
In fact, a lot of ancient societies saw a lot of boys being molested by their masters for convenience

But of course, once again leftists assume that rape and assault are only female problems

>>790310
Yes men and boys also got raped but much less than happened to females.

>>790309
Women weren’t expected to have to the extent of work men were expected to.

But ok, then I will bite

Children had it the worst of all
Children were seen as extensions of their parents and even punished for their parents transgressions

Even the most patriarchal society shows more respect of personhood for women than children

File: 1780706864714.png (20.04 KB, 500x250, Oekaki.png)


>>790311
Are you sure?
It was not as infrequent as you think

It’s just that society back then didn’t think of boys as worthy of sexual protection like girls were

Even now, studies show that there are more male victims of child secular abuse than female.
Male victims are underreported

>>790313
>no you should focus on only this one group of victims, fuck everyone else

>>790312
>Women weren’t expected to have to the extent of work men were expected to.

Proofs? They generally had to take on most of the domestic labour and still do farm work, of course men did more of some physical jobs but women did most of the crafting as well.

Why are you bringing up children? Yes obviously children had less rights than adults, that has nothing to do with what we're talking about

>>790313
As usual, Leftypol dismisses male distress despite talking about equality
They only talk about helping men in the sense of “getting him laid”. God forbid that men want any sort of compassion or care that isn’t romantic or sexual

>>790314
I'm not talking about now I'm talking about beck then.

>>790320
>>790315
Bro you are so deranged, I literally am saying I feel like men are more oppressed in modern western society than women, but you are such a retard you have to dispute the obvious point that women were more oppressed at some point in history

>>790319
> Why are you bringing up children? Yes obviously children had less rights than adults, that has nothing to do with what we're talking about

Because whenever you guys talk about oppression, it’s always women or ethnics you discuss.
Even now, you disregard children as people.

> Proofs? They generally had to take on most of the domestic labour and still do farm work, of course men did more of some physical jobs but women did most of the crafting as well.


Men did crafting too. And yes they also did some domestic labor, it wasn’t limited to just women

>>790300
Yeah, traditionally, but the assignment of roles to genders at all remains no matter how you shuffle it, which will lead to bioessentialism and patriarchy/matriarchy regardless.

>>790320
>>790315
because the point was that society is more misogynistic than misandrist. youre focusing on statistical outliers to prove a point that men are oppressed when cases of female oppression are much more common

>>790323
Maybe make a topic about how children are oppressed and we will talk about that, you fucking nut

>>790324
Okay but when feminists say 'patriarchy' it always means something bad, whereas when they say 'matriarchy' it means something good, the point is they are just trying to elevate women above men which they have succeeded at

>>790321
Modern women are equally oppressed just like modern men are

And youre the one assuming that men in ancient societies had it made, claiming that the average historian had rights and that male children didn’t get raped as often
You’re the one downplaying meme burdens in history

I never said women in history aren’t oppressed but you’re making it out to be where they’re the only ones who suffered
And if anything, children were the ones who suffered the most anyway

>>790325
>statistical outliers

So you think that boy-rape was an outlet phenomenon?

Or how boys were often abused for industrial tasks?

>>790329
>So you think that boy-rape was an outlet phenomenon?
yes because statistically speaking most rape victims were women. men got raped but to a much, MUCH smaller degree. that's the point

>>790327
Feminists I've met irl seem more concerned with the bioessentialism at the root of either being a problem, though I have seen the type you're talking about on social media occasionally. There's definitely sects to it.

>>790329
Let's take girls and boys out if it and only talk about adults, who do you think was most likely to get raped by a conquering army? Women, or men?

>>790321
>I'm not talking about now I'm talking about beck then.


and it was more common back then
Pederasty wasn’t just a Greek thing
We see it Muslims, Japanese, even the Anglos did boy-rape

It was more convenient because it could be disguised with apprenticeships.
Even in all-male spaces, boys get raped more frequently than if it were co-Ed

If a girl gets raped, heads would fly.
Granted the girl would also be wrongfully blamed but still, people would naturally wanna empathize more with a deflowered girl

>>790331
To me if someone says "women should be equal to men" that's not even feminist in 2026, it's just common sense, but if someone starts talking about how men are evil they're probably on some feminist bullshit, so by my standards, most of the feminists I see are just basically enforcing a woman cartel where men are kept out, and kept down.

>>790330
Are you sure about that? Maybe we should leave male youths in hands of male elders with complete total faith and no surveillance.

>>790332
Men were raped alot in armies and jails.

>>790337
>Maybe we should leave male youths in hands of male elders with complete total faith and no surveillance.
how does that have any connection with the point im making
and why the fuck do you keep talking about male rape anyway. youre the one who brought it up for no reason and you keep talking about it

>>790335
The truth is, nobody wants equality
When feminists talk about equality, it’s mainly just window dressing

They don’t want women to be back-broken breadwinners having to earn the affection of their desires partner
They don’t want women to be put into selective service

They don’t want women to go for blue collar work

They don’t want women to be casual/non-chalant around the opposite sex

“Equality” just means “it’s my turn to crack the whip on others”

>>790338
Because you guys keep talking about female rape to begin with

Once again, Leftypol showing that they don’t care about men (not that they care about women either)

You only care about men and women as idealized forms of gender performance

Seeing so may posts on here saying that it’s ok to be disrespectful and degrading toward non-leftist women

>>790335
> To me if someone says "women should be equal to men" that's not even feminist in 2026, it's just common sense

That wasn’t even feminist in 2016, 2006, or even 1996

>>790272
I am a fucking disgusting freak incel pervert with thoughts of kidnapping, raping and humiliating women. This would be considered acceptable if I wasn't fat, short and ugly but I am so it's not.

>>790335
>>790340
>>790342
Well that's why I bring up sects: There's feminists that think that bioessentialism is the problem, and there's feminists that think bioessentialism is good and merely want the good end of the stick. Clearly both at odds with eachother, but both are feminist.

It's like how stalinists and trots are both socialist.

>>790352
Yep.
And that’s why it pains to see people on here treat right wingers as all the same I’m terms of opinions.

They aren’t
I’ve met more alt righters who were sympathetic to MtF transhumanists than they are to cishet male virgins

File: 1780710889920.jpeg (24.28 KB, 588x420, images.jpeg)

they deleted the thread, posting anyways. your governments gone whack btw

>>790272
>>790275
its religion

>What is it about machismo culture
I am sorry but what? Within straight macho spaces men are literally the most open about their kinks if anything. In contemporary bourgeois feminist culture male sexuality is effectively pathologized by a form of neo-puritanism. Even something as benign as saying 'I like big tits' or 'I like big asses' is going to get you scolded as being problematic if a straight male says it, lmao.

>>790373
The only accepted cishet males are celebrities and even they get flak although not as hostile as their commoner counterparts

>>790272
Men should feel shame they like vile shit like that pic you used was probably made by a male furry. Tradcon machismo doesn't do "kinks" that's something libbed up academics invented.

>>790302
>So you think that boys being forced to participate in life threatening activities by their elders to prove their worth isnt misandry?
Maybe if you want to bite the bullet and say it's misogynist for society to encourage women to get pregnant (life threatening). In truth neither is "oppression" (libbed up academic speak again) it's just both sexes doing their role. Gonna have to do the same under socialism too until we live in some freaky scifi culture where everyone is a sexless cyborg and babies are grown in factories.

>>790403
furries haunt the chud mind just as much as trans people do


Unique IPs: 10

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]