Why aren't more women like this?
well, a head-to-torso ratio of that size would probably require way more bloodflow to the head and a much stronger skeleton. also, whatever is happening to the first girl's eyes looks painful so i can see why not many women would want to experience that
What do you mean, there are plenty attention seeking larpers around.
Is that first one listing access to internet twice or is the ᯤ supposed to be RSS feeds?
>>792946also cuckoldry is a predominantly male fetish meaning that males are more likely to enjoy suffering for someone elses pleasure which is why they are more likely to support capitalism
>>792946>>792948These strawmen arbso wrong.
First off there's more leftist men than women..
Leftsm has been reduced to meaning radlib in which case there's more leftist women. But beyond radlib, there's less women
Also women an LGBT are trinket collectors too.
Women collect dresses and shoes and like to consume social media feeds for latest gossip.
Women also like to watch cuck and BDSM porn.
By your logic, women are also more compatible with capitalism
>>792950>First off there's more leftist men than women..prove it
>>792956You need I prove to me that there's more leftist women than men.
Radlib doesn't count as leftism proper
moid genocide
>>792959the 10 guys in here don't represent any community of people, comrade 🥀
>>792950>First off there's more leftist men than women.Literally lying.
https://changeresearch.com/young-women-are-more-liberal-than-young-men/Men in every single age cohort have a more positive view of capitalism than socialism, especially among those 50 and older. Women aged 35 to 49 are equally likely to have a favorable view of capitalism and socialism. However, women 18-34 are almost twice as likely to have a positive impression of socialism vs capitalism. Among women in this age group, having a positive view of socialism is still a minority opinion, but it’s clear that few hold capitalism in high regard. >>792959an imageboard with barely a hundred people, very representative, great job
>>792962yes you worthless mouthbreather, if you want to make factual statements they have to be based on something and not just your fee-fees
>>792969>>792976The article is basing leftism/liberalism based on Anglo American culture war brainrot
The article doesn't explain what leftism is. It only pushes radlib talking points. If this is your definition of "women being more leftist than men" I don't trust your judgement.
>>792989
Did you read the article, mofo? There's a section in the poll dedicated to socialism. You're not even reading what we're saying, you're just writing things and clicking "new reply"
>>792976>yes you worthless mouthbreather, if you want to make factual statements they have to be based on something and not just your fee-feesYour "factual statement" was based on feelings
The article even said women use social media for news consumption more than men.
>>792993It didn't really explain if they understood what socialism was.
>>792993It doesn't explicitly state what socialism is. It only lists socialism in the context of "SJWs doing culture festivities"
>>792999So do you assume higher proportion of women are mistaken as to what socialism is than men? Why do you think so?
>why aren't women more self-centered pick me snowflakes who bring down others to elevate their fragile self esteem
I think there are enough as is (same with men)
>>793005Yes. Socialism is often promoted as SJWism and it's a promoted stereotype for women to be automatically liberal.
Also this is a single isolated poll study.
It reeks too much of gender stereotypes in Anglo American sociopolitical context
>>792996>Your "factual statement" was based on feelings i did not make a factual statement you moron, i questioned yours.
>The article even said women use social media for news consumption more than men.you are actually so retarded that your mind can't conceive of the idea that two different people disagree with you, incredible. i can't wait for the day you kill yourself and stop infecting my board with your half-assed logorrhea.
>>793005The article doesn't explain what svialtm is.
It only says women vote more liberal than men. It doesn't say women vote leftist.
If we were to introduce Marx and Lenin and non-radlib leftism to women, they wouldn't be as enthusiastic in the Anglo American cultural context
In my own experience, the women i've known tend to be more "progressive" in the shitlib idpol culture war brainrot sense, but very few people, men and women alike, actually engage with leftist theory. That study the other anon cited probably puts idiots who think socialism is just welfare and immigration in the same category as actual revolutionary marxists.
Gacha Life mentioned? On my 8chan refugee site?
>>793014You said that women are more leftist then men.
>you are actually so retarded that your mind can't conceive of the idea that two different people disagree with you, incredible. i can't wait for the day you kill yourself and stop infecting my board with your half-assed logorrhea.It seems to me you're the one getting bent out of shape because I mentioned the article stating women use social media for news consumption more than men.
You're the one getting pissy because I dare disagree with you.
And telling me to kms.
Quit ironic considering how this board talks alot about suicide due to capitalism and not having the perfect romantic relationship
>>793016That's what I said. But anon is having a hissy fit
>>793009There is a positive correlation between cultural and economic progressive believes.
>>793024Your claim that women being socialist than men is based on a single poll study that says women are more likely to vote liberal
I read the whole thing. It didn't explain if women understood what socialism was.
>>793027Not exactly.
There's alot of cultural progressives that are not economic progressives
>>793027Cultural progressivism is only promoted under a capitalist context of watered down tourist trap festivals
>>793020It's more likely than you think
Gacha ain't so bad tho
this is what arguing with newgene is like
he thinks his opinions are facts and cant cite a single source to back it up.
>>792946>But guys tend to lean tankie, and girls tend to lean democratic.Wrong. Women want strong daddy figures and men want anarchism.
>Chuds care more about their 4x4 turbo diesel trucks than about the well-being of workers, Wrong again. Fixing your car doesnt mean you love it.
>>793047Maybe you can provide evidence that women are more socialist, rather than radlib, than men first.
Then I will shut up
Until then, I ask you either provide evidence or seek therapy. You may r suffering from hormonal imbalance.
People forget that there's second puberty
>>793043Says the people who assume people's political orientation based on sexual preference.
What other girls love: ice cream, mcdonald, a 6'6 man who work in finance
What i love: blacked OSINT, scary blacked wojak, anything based or possibly christpilled
>>793043>he thinks his opinions are facts and cant cite a single source to back it upCan you provide evidence to prove >>792948is true?
That cuckolding being a male fetish means that men enjoy suffering for others pleasure which is why they're capitalist?
Can you provide evidence that right wingers are all BBC porn addicts?
Can you provide evidence that women and LGBT have mammalian braid while cishet males have reptilian brains?
Can you provide evidence that all small business owners are lazy ass leeches?
These are all opinios that are promoted on here a fact with little to no empirical evidence.
>>793055I posted evidence. You dismissed it as completely invalid because of an unsubstantiated feeling you have that women have a less accurate idea of what socialism is. And now you're just writing random things again and clicking "new reply", hoping that we'll forget that you're full of shit.
>>793063newgene doesn't triple newline like that, that's tingnoter's thing.
Also not that anon but I do think people with strong opinions on stuff should have collections of things they've read on a website somewhere.
>>792934Women are more scared of the world in general. I don't claim to know how much of that is culture and how much is nature, but the fact is, they are the ones who regularly say they're afraid to be outside at night and so on. Revolutionary politics is supposed to be an almost certain danger.
>>793076You posted or article that isn't clarified on socialism. It says women are more liberal leaning.
>>793090>Also not that anon but I do think people with strong opinions on stuff should have collections of things they've read on a website somewhere.Tell that to>>793076
>>793090I do paragraphs, not long run in sentences.
No spatial breaks makes it easier to skip over words.
>>793100Liberal leaning as opposed to conservative leaning, not as opposed to socialist leaning. Still haven't provided evidence that women are more wrong about socialism than men.
>>793063why should i provide evidence for that list of statements thst personally trigger you
>>793128It listed socialism in the context of SJW definition.
>>793140Because you're being triggered about my criticism of your opinion
>>793159"SJW" doesn't even mean anything. And who even says sjw instead of woke or soy in the big 26? Get with the times, old man
>>793169SJW is still a relevant term and I have never seen anyone else except you get triggered over the word "SJW"
"Woke" and "soy" are adjective that can also apply to the right.
Just admit that you based your opinion on the anglo american impression of socialism.
>>792934>posting this shit in 2015+10Meds + BBC
>>793171How is it any different than woke and soy? This is all I'm interested about now, since you're arguing in bad faith anyway.
>triggeredDamn, you really are an old man. You're supposed to say that it's spiking my cortisol, grandpa.
>>793182Youre still not providing any more evidence.
You're in bad faith especially since you're still triggered over SJW
>>792950>there's more leftist men than women"the property owning gender is more anti-capitalist"
Andrew Tate is celebrated as a role model for a reason. Every man under patriarchy aspires to be a parasitic passive income landlord rentier class who hangs out in their pedo fraternal cult secret societies. Leftist men all talk about how they love Bookchin or Chomsky, who were friendly with Rothbard and Epstein respectively
>>793169>"SJW" doesn't even mean anythingneoliberal NPC programming:
"Hamas doesn't ACTUALLY care about Palestinians. You're just PRETENDING to care about Palestinians, you're actually antisemitic/anti-white/anti-men" etc
>>793182>How is it any different than woke and soy?wokeness (i.e that the FBI assassinated MLK, and recently BLM, and now covers up lynching random teens as 'suicides') is yet another innovation created by black people which parasitic settler whites stole as culture vultures, very Israeli
Soy has to do with "phyto-estrogen" and their sexual pathology about testosterone which is 90% of all reactionary politics
>>793206>"the property owning gender is more anti-capitalist"Andrew Tate is celebrated as a role model for a reason. Every man under patriarchy aspires to be a parasitic passive income landlord rentier class who hangs out in their pedo fraternal cult secret societies. Leftist men all talk about how they love Bookchin or Chomsky, who were friendly with Rothbard and Epstein respectively
Women do too. Alot of popular fnale role models are girlbosses. Also Andrew Tate isn't really as popular with men as you think.
He's assumed to be a hit with men because he pisses off feminists.
Also most men don't really aspire to be bourgeois rentiers. That's just a psyop.
Men are harassed into pursuing bourgeois aspirations to prove themselves.
Unique IPs: 24