/siberia/ - Off-topic

Because hierarchy is the core concept with which they conceive of every social aspect.

>>794621
if i was looking to be subordinate then i would be subordinate to the pervading sociopolitical theory of my society; that is all beings are equal and hierarchy are social constructs.
however, continuing to be 'truly' right wing outside of the realm of cuckservatism requires a degree of self-introspection that indicates that you are not infact mindlessly servile for lofty abstractions and your thoughts are your own
i dont speak for other chuds however but thats for my case
btw no arrow

To be a right winger is to unironically believe in the Just World fallacy 24/7. That's all it is at the core.
>There are people starving in x country
<They deserved it because they were lazy or something idk
>There's people being bombed in y country
<They deserved it because they're scary or threatening us or something idk
>Our government is completely corrupt and filled with cancerous businessmen
<They worked HARD to get where they are and you should just pull yourself up by your bootstraps
etc.
It's just an advanced coping mechanism disguised as political ideology. It doesn't matter whether they claim to be libertarian, fascist, milquetoast conservative, etc. it just all boils down to this core concept.

>>794626
>subordinate to the pervading sociopolitical theory of my society; that is all beings are equal and hierarchy are social constructs.
Do chuds unironically believe this? Half the western world + the ruling class of at the very least the most powerful country of the lot say otherwise.
Chuds can't seem to make up their minds if they represta silent majority or are a minority fighting against the more powerful current of a secret liberal order

>>794628
Its just any excuse in the book to defend status quo.

>>794628
>To be a right winger is to unironically believe in the Just World fallacy 24/7. That's all it is at the core.
While that is probably true for a good number of rightwingers, I'd say I am the way I am for the opposite lens of thinking.

>There are people starving in x country
<Nobody will help them because they are more pre-occupied with themselves.

>There's people being bombed in y country
<Everyone wants to conquer and flex their strength. It can't be helped that nations want to steal from their neighbors and make a show of strength–you might as well too. Conquer or be conquered.

>Our government is completely corrupt and filled with cancerous businessmen
<Yeah, people are corrupt and filled with lobbyists. So it is.

As for Just War theory especially, I feel like I'm way more of a so-called political realist and think people don't invade and attack other countries because it is the morally right thing to do, like because of human rights abuses, or a neighbor is a tyrant/dictator, or because they are immoral, so all wars must be defensive wars or wars of liberation, but rather mostly to secure dominance, diplomacy, power & influence, wealth and resources like in an RTS game.
…
Maybe that is the view of some rightwingers, like some neocons (democracy crusades / "overthrow this dictator"), tradcath integralists (tradcathy crusades / "overthrow this tyrant", and more idealistic rightwingers, like some NAP ancap ones, but there are plenty of others who aren't and are more gritty.

>>794663
Kill yourself

>>794670
arent you doing exactly what the image told you not to do

>>794669
the game and its relation to the world has been a reoccurring discourse. You spit bar for bar the prime example of games cause imperialistic thinking. Its interesting. Of course politically Id hate you but its cool to see

>>794663
>Conquer or be conquered
Crakkka you are a SERF!!! you dont conquer, you either get raped, killed or somehow survive fighting for the interests of other people and Might get a little consolation prize from the war spoils so that youll keep yourself meager and submissive(not in a hot way) instead of fighting for your own interest.

>>794684
its basically the other side of the cope. one side is saying that society is actually totally fair and thats why you shouldnt question it, the other side is total apathy and saying that its just how things are so you might as well not even fight it

>>794686
That’s the way adults treat children especially when it comes to religious doctrine

i thought you were doing another why are rightoids dum dums skitch but you're right about this one

They especially love enforcing decorative formalities onto children.
School uniforms, mandatory bible study in school, no candy allowed, no electronic media, etc

>>795095
>School uniforms
based
>Mandatory bible study in school
based
>No candy allowed
based
>No electronic media
based

>>795096
Nice spooks there, dumbass. How about you stop believing in your ancient religion. All religion is reactionary.

>>795097
True Christianity inevitably leads to Communism and your idol knew it and hated it for that reason alone.

>>795082
Do you think this is learned behavior due to fear based upbringing (parents beating them, churches indoctrinating through fear) when they were young?
It's like they have a need to worship an authoritative figure, usually an aggressive one.
A right winger posted earlier here >>794626
about lefties being servile, and I will only agree with him half way. It's one thing to keep your head down and go along with progressive mantra because you fear losing your job or social stigma. It's another thing entirely to want a boot to lick, which is something you only see among right leaning people.

>>795098
>>795097
have you heard about our lord and saviour

>>795097
bro we're making spooks real. this is the fucking internet! we make spectres and illusions concrete and materiel here.

>>795096
Cringe on all four