Yeah he was found not guilty but under a capitalist system a rich person being found not guilty by the court doesn’t mean anything because laws don’t apply to these people, do was he innocent or guilty because I don’t know much about the case.
I don't think so, he was a child lover in a true sense, his childhood was taken away by his father.
>>797203His father was evil for sure but that doesn’t justify sharing a bed with kids
>>797206What if the kids liked it though? I mean just sharing the bed and nothing else that may or may not have happened.
He 100% banged kids. Imagine anybody, literally anybody besides MJ speaking like this:
https://youtu.be/MMrOZte3hvo?si=upAbdomaCcWXSIHn>>797210You are literally justifying pedophilia
Most obvious case of guilty in history and his fans are legit psychotic to deny this
>>797217They simply can't comprehend that someone can be a legendary entertainer and also do fucked up things.
>>797206From what I heard, Michael had a mansion with multiple rooms. So everyone had their own bedroom
I’m not a fan if his, but I do believe that he is innocent and that he’s just weird about kids because of his own lost childhood. Also, this fiasco started when he made a pro-Palestine song. It’s not far fetched that Zionists in the music industry wanted to punish him over it. You can’t have a world renowned star speaking out against the oppression of Palestinians. It’s also odd that if he was a child diddler that he is not in the Epstein files. Surely he could have done this all in secret as a rich man when there are already established child sex trafficking networks for the ultra wealthy.