>be handed everything
>throw it all away killing random middle schoolers
genuinely why are zoomers like this
>>797698mf pretending Millenials didn't do the same
Who's tom pearl?
>>797700>who inspired you<chudthis has got to be satire. are we actually fucking joking
>>797698https://tompearl.com/ >>797704 (me)
fuck i got the replies the wrong way around just pretend they're correct
>”why are zoomers like this”
>forgets about millennials doing the same thing for the past decade
>>797699This. A lot of our current mass shooting spree started with millennials
>>797704he means the chud guy with the porn stache who went around videoing himself saying the N WORD to black people
>>797698white people be like yes i helped with my little nazi brothers manifesto
>>797698this is why children should get the fuck off the internet dawg. it's not for them. I say that as a millennial who grew up with it. it's only gonna brainrot the youth, nothing good can come from it unless it's tightly regulated (by parents, not the state)
>>797729Kids have been on the Internet since the 1990s. It’s not the Internet that’s brainrooting them, it’s political propaganda
We had Hitler Youth and other juvenile reactionary groups long before the Internet
Telling kids to get off the Internet for their “safety” is really just selfish.
Most kids go online to play games and make fanart anyway
>>797729Be honest you want kids banned for your own selfish convenience because you think kids are annoying. You’re just using the whole reactionary propaganda thing as an excuse
There’s more adults who fall into reactionary propaganda than children
>>797729>it's only gonna brainrot the youth, nothing good can come from it unless it's tightly regulated The same thing was said about TV, radio, and even graphic novels
Whose willing to bet the OP pic was fake and it’s being posted here for rage bait?
>>797729I think they should fuck off for the sake of the adults honestly, anonimity has allowed teenagers to influence the thoughts and mind of actual adults and in term turn them immature.
>>797729>millennial wants kids to be denied Internet access for “safety” reasons Many such cases
>>797737Actually it’s the other way around
Adults are the ones influencing each other with dumb opinions
I see more adults who promote crackpot theories than teens
>>797737Blaming teens for everything wrong is classic boomer behavior
Who was the one who started the conspiracy theory crap?
And the whole neopuritan craze?
Anonymity has allowed adults to troll/bully kids for liking kiddie franchises
There’s been instances of adults bullying fanfiction spaces for “cringe compilation “ content
>>797737Imageboard users are the only ones who are like this. The rest of the Internet outside of derelict forums like this usually is adults advertising their demented fringe theories.
>>797739Just because adults badly influence kids, doesn't mean the reverse isn't true, and if anything it's more worrying.
>>797740How many "adults" who did the bullying were teenager bullying othet teenagers, how many adults were convinced by the teenagers to participate in.
Talking about Kiddies shit, how many adults now think it's normal to be deeply invested into the children's slop ? "Let people enjoy things" ideology is clearly adolescent in its mindset.
>>797743>How many "adults" who did the bullying were teenager bullying othet teenagers, That’s a fair point but still. There are actual adults that do troll kiddie spaces for fun. Even in online video games, alot of the senior players would troll the newbies all “for good fun” despite complaining about kids doing the same
how many adults were convinced by the teenagers to participate in.
Very few
>Talking about Kiddies shit, how many adults now think it's normal to be deeply invested into the children's slop ? "Let people enjoy things" ideology is clearly adolescent in its mindset.You seem to have an issue with adults liking kiddie stuff which was always a thing but wasn’t openly encouraged
Also if “Let people enjoy things” is an adolescent mindset it’s not such a bad thing then.
>>797743>Talking about Kiddies shit, how many adults now think it's normal to be deeply invested into the children's slop ? "Let people enjoy things" ideology is clearly adolescent in its mindset.Adult slop is much more brain rotting.
Look on here for example.
Lots of pseudo intellectual theories about how economy should work and even sympathetic suggestions about “sexual redistribution”.
>Just because adults badly influence kids, doesn't mean the reverse isn't true, and if anything it's more worryingThe reverse is not as common. You’re making it a big deal to justify your misopedia
>>797746>You seem to have an issue with adults liking kiddie stuff which was always a thing but wasn’t openly encouraged.Probably was a thing before, but hard to deny its exploded in these last few years, just look at the popularity of superhero slop, it's at the point where even the youth are less into it then grown men.
>Also if “Let people enjoy things” is an adolescent mindset it’s not such a bad thing then.It is a bad thing, people shouldn't let themselves become infantilised idiots slurping on the slop fed to them by Hollywood.
>>797749>Probably was a thing before, but hard to deny its exploded in these last few years, just look at the popularity of superhero slop, it's at the point where even the youth are less into it then grown menIt’s been a thing for at least two decades.
>It is a bad thing, people shouldn't let themselves become infantilised idiots slurping on the slop fed to them by HollywoodAnd you think discussing fringe politics on derelict forums is any more constructive?
If anything, the people who obsess about maturity are often the least mature
You’re on a chat space that’s notorious for constant spam threads about “TFW no gf” and talking about get-rich-quick” schemes and trying to make leftism appear cool to the masses.
That’s way more immature than adults watching superhero movies
I find it also funny that people care about maturity only in aesthetics but not in technical skill.
You cry about grown men and women being into Marvel and DC movies but aren’t concerned about the dwindling industrial skill sets of the average adults
Most prime age adults nowadays are working unskilled jobs that used to be for school kids to earn pocket money.
That’s a more concerning thing.
Trades are dismissed as lumpen paradise and college maxing is encouraged especially for social lives
>>797749IMO, adults enjoying YA fiction in public is more wholesome and constructive
Most socially endorsed activities for adults is often fornication, drinking, smoking, and/or religiopolitical activism
>>797753You're exacly what i'm talking about, you're making a bunch of immature accusations about me because you can't actually adress what I say. When did I ever say that dwindling industrial skill of the worker isn't an issue ?
>>797754Adults enjoying YA had made them insane and vain, look at the YA community for five seconds.
Reading, normal, adult books has been an endorsed activity practiced my most people for a while. There are plenty of adult hobbies that aren't immature.
>>797757>You're exacly what i'm talking about, you're making a bunch of immature accusations about me because you can't actually adress what I say. When did I ever say that dwindling industrial skill of the worker isn't an issue ?Well, it’s not discussed as much as “male loneliness” or “soyjaks” or whatever other dumb shit that’s prioritized on here for topical concerns
>Adults enjoying YA had made them insane and vain, look at the YA community for five seconds.True but that also applies to religious and political books as well
Adults used to go up in arms about controversial books that weren’t YA
>Reading, normal, adult books has been an endorsed activity practiced my most people for a while. Define “normal adult” books? Most common adult fiction are romance novels or some midlife crisis memoirs. In fact there’s more similarities than difference between adult fiction and YA fiction. The main difference is just the graphic design of the book covers and maybe the lingo. But the psychological themes are all similar.
>There are plenty of adult hobbies that aren't immatureAnd there’s plenty of kiddie activities that aren’t immature.
Again, if you define maturity by aesthetics, you’re “still a child” as they say.
Haven’t you heard about CS Lewis about the obsession with maturity?
>>797757>Adults enjoying YA had made them insane and vain, look at the YA community for five seconds.Adults go insane over non-YA books.
Religiopolitical communities are especially notorious for going apeshit over books that don’t grovel towards Jesus/Jehovah/Allah
>>797758>Well, it’s not discussed as much as “male loneliness” or “soyjaks” or whatever other dumb shit that’s prioritized on here for topical concerns.I find those discussion just as dumb as you do.
>True but that also applies to religious and political books as well Adults used to go up in arms about controversial books that weren’t YAThey usually went to war for the ideas behind the book, not the content of it. Religion and politics is a bit more complex then fandom.
>Define “normal adult” books? Most common adult fiction are romance novels or some midlife crisis memoirs. In fact there’s more similarities than difference between adult fiction and YA fiction. The main difference is just the graphic design of the book covers and maybe the lingo. But the psychological themes are all similar. There are plenty of immature adults books as well, romance being a very obvious exemple.
I think the main distinction between books for children or for adult is the maturity of the themes explored, books for children or teenagers tend to be fairly simplistic, with a very clear good and evil side, with no strong moral conundrum, no real in depth writing.
>And there’s plenty of kiddie activities that aren’t immature.Something being for children makes it immature in its definition.
>Again, if you define maturity by aesthetics, you’re “still a child” as they say.I'm not defining it by aesthetics tho.
>Haven’t you heard about CS Lewis about the obsession with maturity?And have you head what Alan Moore has to say about superheros ?
>>797757>You're exacly what i'm talking about, you're making a bunch of immature accusations about me because you can't actually adress what I sayAren’t you the one making immature accusations about kiddie culture allegedly ruining adults?
And blaming kids for influencing adults?
Those are immature accusations.
Most fringe communities are made by and populated by adults and they spread their fringe theories online influencing kids and other adults.
I mean look on here.
Most people here are failed adults who are consuming fringe theory crap to cope with unfulfilled youth.
Irony is, the things you complain about are more likely on imageboards than on the more mainstream platforms
>>797761Relgious and political groups believe the ideas the books spread, can't say the same for YA. There is plenty of difference between harassing someone for disliking a book you like and harassing someone for having a fundamentally different worldview, not that I agree with it, but they're different phenomenons.
>>797763And they said the same about radio and books
>>797762>think the main distinction between books for children or for adult is the maturity of the themes explored, books for children or teenagers tend to be fairly simplistic, with a very clear good and evil side, with no strong moral conundrum, no real in depth writing. Not always. Especially for YA where it’s often grey areas and anti heroes and bitter sweet victories
Also, most childrens stories in the old days were more graphic and nuanced
>Something being for children makes it immature in its definition. Not exactly. There’s a lot of well written childrens media that reverberates even with adults
>I'm not defining it by aesthetics thoGetting triggered over adults watching kids media isn’t defining maturity by aesthetics?
>And have you head what Alan Moore has to say about superheros I think so. And you know what? I don’t care because I don’t let superhero media influence my thinking. I just enjoy it for what it is, mere art, even if it’s “cheap quality”
>They usually went to war for the ideas behind the book, not the content of it. Religion and politics is a bit more complex then fandomPerhaps but it’s still just as dumb if not even more so because it involves bloodshed.
>>797765Perhaps but I think religiopolitical hysteria is much dumber than fandom.
Religiopoliitical activites often involve forcing physical and social practices that often have detrimental consequences for people involved.
You have adults that justify forcing religious practices into children, even beating their kids for questioning said religion.
I would take the absurdity of fandom any day.
I especially say this as some one who grew up with a religious ethnic mom.
You have no idea the asinine petulance that adults are capable of in the realm of religiopolitics.
>>797763It’s interesting that adults always blame electronic media for aggression in children when kids used to be far more aggressive in their play before TV
This study reads as “TV is bad because it just is”. I can understand excessive TV consumption though.
>>797763You’re forgetting about novels and radio
A lot of Puritans back in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries thought that secular novels were bad for kids because it encouraged bad behavior
>>797763This is why I will never understand why adults tell kids to “expand their mind” while barring/filtering novel experiences to the point where the novelty doesn’t exist
Adults want childhood to be remain as sterile and redundant as possible to for the sake of “innocence”
>>797698>>797699>>797716>turning something <0.0000001% of the population does into an age cohort astrology issue"wHy arE [made up spooks in my head] LiKe ThIs?!??!!"
>>797765>Relgious and political groups believe the ideas the books spread, can't say the same for YANot true. People go apeshit over the figures of said religions, not ideas themselves
Christians persecute atheists for not believing in Jehovah and Jesus
Muslims kill people for not believing in Allah
Yet both groups of persecutors share the same ideals as their opposition
Was there another burger shooting?
>>797799Probably but we don't seem to make as much of an issue about them. We've become burned out over them.
Why do 4cuckers and other internet rightoids shoot up schools or random places? They always talk about how DUH JOOZ or globohomo elites are making their lives shitty but they always target average ass people with no institutional power whatsoever . I had a theory that they were targeting "normalfags" because they consider them complicit for being goycattle who bullied them for being neglected anti-social freaks but I don't even think thats true anymore, because they are constantly talking about how people are finally "WAKING UP AND GETTING REDPILLED" which means they still have some inherent trust in the public but still mass murder them for some reason.
>It's for attention
Why make the manifesto in the first place? Just let the action speak for itself if they are such attenionwhores, in fact, the manifesto makes it worse because it just reveals how shallow and retarded they all actually are.
>>797807Some do target synagogues tho, and they unironically believe an homeless jew is in the same conspiracy as a millionaire one
>>797807Their goal is just to make people suffer, they're misanthropes, killing school children is probably the brutalest way to do this. it's not even about fame.
>>797726forgot that faggot existed kek
>>797917>neonazi>jacksepticeye>tom pearl>philipino>trans (?)ok this is satire
>>797917>>797919its like the punch line to a joke
>>797919Why is jacksepticeye listed on there?
>>797953maybe they got him confused with pewdiepie?
>>797700Most prolific mass shooter in Canadian history.
>>797921Non-whites are the most committed to the principles of National Socialism.
Unique IPs: 20