new 'eligion 'or 'eakfast just dropped
it's on my watchlist already :)
it was a good vid, already watched it
>TL;DR babies arent born with religious beliefs but by 3.5 they develop a theory of mind, including a theory of mind for dead things
>they have to be socialized into believing specific religious ideas
>non-religiosity is surprisingly "sticky" and persists across generations in the same family through socialization even if the person themselves wasn't raised to be explicitly nonreligious. This is because modern 1st world societies subconsciously indoctrinates new generations into secular humanism.
it's a bit more nuanced than that but i'm going off memory here. watched it like 4 hours ago
>>801380theres a part where he talks about superstitious beliefs and their link to childrens brains having difficulty to discern objects from agents, and that this is actually an evolutionary hiccup we have from prehistoric times, that made me think, if scared superstitious people are more likely to survive in nature, could it be that humans naturally evolved to be more religious? it mustve had at least some impact on our society right?
>>801429superstitions are really just pattern recognition making false associations because of not having enough information, pretty much. other animals can be pretty readily develop similar "superstitious" behavior, not specifically a human thing. religion is though, because it entails having a narrative passed down through language which no other known animals have.