/siberia/ - Off-topic

depends on who you kill thoe

>>804423
I'm talking about them indefensible serial killers that kill children and stuff

dickhead cat

>>804428
>>804423
Dexter is a fantasy, the whole shtick of serial killers is to prey on the weak and vulnerable, this is how they get away with it

shut up buzz i'm gonna kill you

>>804423
people who enjoy killing have no morals.

>>804433
I thought “morality is a spook”?

>>804428
>indefensible serial killers that kill children
<"Israel is the most moral army"
Bourgeois liebral moralism explicitly states that the serial killer apartheid regime is the most internally consistent ideology to their Judeo-Christian morality, and they're right. Baal human sacrifices at the satanic altar of capital is their entire schtick, it always was that way and merely evolved into Tony Blair's globalist ID card regime to surveil his undocumented cattle

>>804433
>killing people is le bad and immoral
<pedophilia isn't actually bad, saying otherwise is just moralism
does siberia really?

>>804445
The moralfags are annoying, pedophilia is bad because it's exploitative, depends on inequal class and familial relations, and injures physically and mentally children for no other reason than the enjoyement of sick adults. The outcome is just bad for society and everyone involved.

Killing is sometimes necessary in crisis situations to achieve a goal at least while I can't think of any scenario where raping a child would lead so something worthwile.

too many whipits

>>804446
finally, a sensible opinion on leftypol.org/siberia/

>>804443
Zionists support the extermination of Palestinians, Armenians and pagans. So (((Trump))) supports the Evangelical-Zionist New World Order and the Capitalist war machine

>>804428
There is a particularly type of revisionism going around here. The "think of the children" revisionism.

>>804459
post vid

>>804420
Most of the userbase lurks on reactionary spaces for ragebait and/or are former reactionaries

>>804420
Unironically a serial killer is less evil than the average American senator and way less evil than any American president.
If a serial killer politician had great policies that actually helped the vast majority of people then they would be worth supporting over a non-serial killer neoliberal/fascist politician who causes far more death and suffering on a much larger scale over a longer period of time.
>nooo anon you can't say that!
OBVIOUSLY being a serial killer is a political liability so it's not a good idea to go around making them candidates. But that is a STRATEGIC decision, not a MORAL one. Those are not the same, but a lot of the online left can't seem to tell the difference.
And no, "I don't support X candidate because I'm against electoralism" is not a valid argument when you spend all your time attacking X candidate. You can't pretend to be uninvested when you're clearly invested. It's cowardly weasel behavior.
I sprung the trap and accepted the ridiculous premise just to get my point across.

>>804479
I think I would support a serial killer candidate who announced no new wars, end support to Israel and medicare for all or universal healthcare if they were viable. Maybe not openly, I'm still a coward, but I don't care too much how those things are accomplished as long as I'm not too negatively effected. A little negative effect is alright but not too much.

>>804484
When we're talking about policies that impact the lives of millions, that's far more important than a handful of people being hurt or killed. Harm reduction is important so the ideal would be politicians that are upstanding citizens, but if we're choosing between a squeaky clean fascist and a dirty slimy soccdem, I'm choosing the slimeball every time.

>>804479
TRVKE

Being a serial killer is immoral but if I’m being honest I’m too depressed to find any hope in humanity so just kill whoever tf you want atp.