/siberia/ - Off-topic

Why do they glow?

rock is this true?

AI should be banned under Communism, not because it destroys jobs or other retarded made up nonsense, but because it is like digital crack to low lQ people who need an algo to think for them. AI is incompatible with an educated and smart population and for that reason alone it should be suppressed.

>>805385
And if AI will replace jobs, the CEOs will lay off workers in order to save money and use AI for these jobs. Therefore, the rich will become more wealthy.

>>805376
whoever made this should be sent to a gulag

>>805385
May as well ban writing.
That’s what a lot of educated folks in the ancient world thought about writing for “low autism score people”.

Also, “AI” isnt real yet. All we have now is LLM.

>>805385
>>805386
>>805389
>>805398
>>805410
Shut the hell up, anti-machine bigots

Tolerance now

>>805376
Wheels of progress grind luddites bones into dust.

>>805385
this is really the thing that people miss in these inane debates about AI. people try to launder the issue as being about all sorts of moral contingencies like the environmental impact (as if there aren't dozens of other far more pressing environmentally destructive practices in modern life that are entirely unnecessary) or people losing their jobs (automation is an inevitable contradiction under capitalism and AI is only the development of this coming for knowledge labor), but it's self-evident in the cognitive impact that genAI chatbots have on users that the technology arrived too soon given where humanity is at this stage of the development of its consciousness. it only serves to amplify the stupidity of the herd and industrialize the ability of midwits to replicate their cancerous ideas; it's an intensifier of the asymmetry between the development of consciousness and the low-cost for backwards false beliefs to perpetuate themselves on a scale unlike anything ever seen in human history.

>>805386
correct. picrel

>>805432
Remember the Eternal Reoccurrence theory

>>805447
Nietzsche wawas a gay retard

>>805447
i saw a screenshot where a server said they were waiting a table and the boomer took a screenshot of the menu and asked chat gpt what to get today.

>>805449
then you should relate a lot to what he had to say.

>>805450
as much as the "okay boomer" meme feels dated at this point since everything is fucked currently along more intergenerational lines I do think that boomers are the epitome of what I'm describing because they're an entire generation that never had to develop into human beings and as a result are all permanent adult toddlers complete with infantile sociopathy who are all too happy to outsource even the shallow performance of personhood or autonomy or whatever onto a lowest common denominator statistical output customer service voice chatbot.

>>805453
I would but he was also a polack which is a dealbreaker

>>805376
>ѢADEATS!
what did he mean by this

>>805385
if you accept the heritability of lQ for argument's sake, what is to be done with low lQ people? if you can't just educate them and make them smart, what're you to do with them?
i don't want edgy answers like "kill them, sterilise them, make them wear a dunce cap at all time", i want good humanist answers but i'm not sure how we can realistically re-align our status hierarchy so that being dumb is like being bad at sports rather than a moral failing, but equally, just as you or i wouldn't think we should compete in the olympics, dumb people would have enough humility to more or less stay out of political and administrative questions beyond their own immediate needs.

the only person i've seen really engage with what you do with dumb people is Deep Left Analysis (weird neoliberal elitist) idea of McGenics, which would basically agree that AI is crack for Low autism score people but argue it's a good thing and should be embraced. let them spend all day indoors talking to chatGPT and eating McDonalds until they have a heart attack while people with self control run the world. but that's quite callous if something better can be designed.

>>805447
if you wanted to cope and be optimistic, you could imagine that as dumb people outsource their opinions to chatGPT their political attitudes will become less reactionary. as it stands, dumb people are generally more likely to hold reactionary views while LLMs trend towards a sort of vaguely humanist liberal positivity-bias slop. the net effect of outsourcing the average right-wing voter's election choices to ChatGPT would probably be positive.

of course, you can always browbeat an LLM into agreeing with you that hitler was right, but i did say if you wanted to cope…