[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1784840109359-5.png (70.5 KB, 304x280, ClipboardImage.png)

 

Right wingers and conservatives hate children far far more than childfree people or even anti-natalist. They are the demographic which harms children the most and the one who least deserves them. They treat children as either dolls to live vicariously through, or sex objects.

true

True this.
In fact,interesting thing about them is that conservatives are actually pro-adult degeneracy. When conservatives cry about degeneracy, nine times out of ten they’re whining about young people having differing vices than their parents.

Or rather that they are upset about kids growing up with amenities or new media.

Conservatives don’t like seeing children being autonomous in anyway.
They don’t want children to explore emotions beyond happiness, fear of spanking, and boredom

They don’t like it when kids develop nuances or prefer more sophisticated forms of entertainment.

They don’t like it when kids develop grey morality or cynicism

They want kids to remain as simple and shallow as possible

“Let kids be kids” usually means “please remain mediocre and ignorant until you’re thirty”

Funny how people who actually care about kids are all antinatalists or proponents of voluntary extinction while all the actual subhumans are popping out at least 20 babies. In an ideal world, it would be the childfree leftoids, marxists and even fedoralords who'd be the breeders while all the Trumpcucks, rightoids and sky daddy botherers are discouraged from even being straight.

>>808652
One of life's great paradoxes unfortunately, those who worry the most about their children's wellbeing are least likely to have them

>>808666
That’s because those are the few people that see children as human beings.

>>808652
This. It’s why I’m leery of pro-natalism
Pro natalsists see children as tools to extend their “human legacy”

Most media organizations that are family/youth oriented usually are responsible for a lot of child abuse.
Take a look at Nickelodeon, TLC, or any religiopolitical organization with the word “Family” in their name

Or any sort of ascetic/bohemian organization that’s anti-modernity.

They treat kids as expendable workhorses and/or sentient sex dolls

This is why communism must take youth liberation seriously and not dismiss it as an anarchist meme

>>808701
Communists will soon listen to incels demanding state-sponsored dating events than that unfortunately.

Being an adult means that your opinions and wants are always respected no matter how dumb or destructive they are

This is why I think childhood nostalgia in some ways, a form of self-cuckery

uh huh. and while we're at it, it bears mentioning that they think the childfree leftists are the ones who are selfish, for not wanting to undertake the responsibility of having a child.

having a kid is a huge responsibility, and not one you should undertake lightly. the rightoids don't even think twice about it, they just do it because it can be done, like just because you're one part of a baby making factory as part and parcel of your existence, that means that some onus is on you to make those babies. what utter horse shit, and the best justifications they can come up with are appeals to nature (the aforementioned) or appealing to God. it's absurd.

the establishment needs kids because a capitalist society will always need fresh meat to exploit.

>>808709
It’s not just rightoids. Most people even leftists think that kids are an entitlement for adults.

Adults in general even in our more humanitarian era cannot think of children as fellow human beings. They only think of them as pets

Our current era of parental ethos is more focused on caging kids from worldly effects for the sake of artificially extending innocence.

Children the only demographic that’s not allowed any sort of sociolegal defense against the incompetence or malevolence of other parties.

Most adults think kids being told about how to defend themselves against abusive parents is sabotage.

Adults would rather that a thousand kids die than seeing a couple dozen kids survive and raise themselves without any smothering adult prescence

>>808722
Also, kids are seen as extension sod their parents. Notice that religious laws always place major importance on “kids need to obey their parents” but there’s no religious law that punishes adults for abusing kids.

Parents can diss own kids for any reason but kids are not allowed to disown parents
Kids are punished for their parents sins.

Kids are not allowed any sort of individuality even nowadays

I see this in parenting and schooling articles that individualism in children is looked upon as bad or unnecessary

Children are treated with moral/social collectivism.


Unique IPs: 8

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]