Can someone explain to a brainlet like me why this is materially impossible?
>>808664For one, AI and robots are nowhere near good enough yet to replace all human labour, but more importantly, they are all owned by the rich, who want the spoils for themselves, why would the oligarchs and billionaires choose to give up their wealth freely to the entire world? If they were inclined to do that, they would have done it already.
climate change
AI and robots will replace BBC
>>808669You can already get yourself a big girth fuckmachine my good bitch
I remember when Bill Gates was considered the richest person in the world and you could accept that, almost everyone used Windows daily and Microsoft was known as a cut-throat business being pretty much a monopoly. But if you look at the rich peoples lists there's also Zuckerberg (Facebook), Bezos (Amazon), that two guys who made Google, they are all people who did something that is used by countless people every day, so even though their wealth is insanely obscene, you can say that at least they have some kind of product that billions of people actually use. Even with Oracle we know that it is used by businesses for some reason.
Chinese AI advancements are hastening the American AI bubble's pop proximity btw
People have been saying shit like this for years
I just want robots for sex.
>>808695This.
It’s funny that the elites are against sex robots because they claim it will cause a sociopsychological epidemic but they want robots to be permanent caretakers of humans