Can someone explain to a brainlet like me why this is materially impossible?
>>808664For one, AI and robots are nowhere near good enough yet to replace all human labour, but more importantly, they are all owned by the rich, who want the spoils for themselves, why would the oligarchs and billionaires choose to give up their wealth freely to the entire world? If they were inclined to do that, they would have done it already.
climate change
AI and robots will replace BBC
>>808669You can already get yourself a big girth fuckmachine my good bitch
I remember when Bill Gates was considered the richest person in the world and you could accept that, almost everyone used Windows daily and Microsoft was known as a cut-throat business being pretty much a monopoly. But if you look at the rich peoples lists there's also Zuckerberg (Facebook), Bezos (Amazon), that two guys who made Google, they are all people who did something that is used by countless people every day, so even though their wealth is insanely obscene, you can say that at least they have some kind of product that billions of people actually use. Even with Oracle we know that it is used by businesses for some reason.
Chinese AI advancements are hastening the American AI bubble's pop proximity btw
People have been saying shit like this for years
I just want robots for sex.
>>808695This.
It’s funny that the elites are against sex robots because they claim it will cause a sociopsychological epidemic but they want robots to be permanent caretakers of humans
>>808664it's not materially impossible but it's midwittery to imagine this would happen without deliberate political change, and one just has to take a look at the history of actual economic transitions to realize this. the idea of technology forcing society forward without deliberate human action behind it is a myth and a lie.
It makes sense when humans mean only billionaires.
>>808697They already let AI gfs proliferate. Why clutching pearl about sexbots at this point?
>>808970>Why clutching pearl about sexbots at this point?I guess its marketing. People get all moral about sex.
>>808970There’s places that are putting their foot down about AI gfs
All visions of abundance, whether left or right, run into the resource and environmental problem. There used to be an old line about how if everyone lived like an American we'd need 4 Earths. If you want to live like an average Cuban or Vietnamese though, that could work.
>>808686What if the machines can go on strike.
>>809155If you want every human on earth to live like America you need six to eight planet earths
>>809163if you want every human to live a comparable quality of life to america you can do it
if you want to live
like america then it's impossible
>>808664After a century of hunting down and killing communists american porkies are like this…
>>809205They didn't do it for ideological reasons. They mainly did it for the love of the game.
>>808671Yeah, he had to present himself as a science guy because how else would he have a public platform
>>809223This.
At least the tech giants of old at least had some level of expertise under their belt. In fact, they had to have some expertise in order to become as draconian as they did, even if they were born into wealth.
>>809217it's an important one. We cannot live in a world where we use things for a little bit then throw it away. we'd need to fundamentally reorient production, planning, and socialization towards one where things last for generations again and we share them, but with that we gain the possibility of a world where everyone has plenty to go around. No amount of abundance will last forever if you just torch it all.
lmao elon is literally copying jensen huangs fit. that's embarassing. he can't even come up with an outfit beyond copying the embarassing gusano who said "welcome to my hood"
>>808684Also this. Open weight frontier models gut ameriKKKan AIconomics.
>>809264Exactly. You’re right on everything. This is what communism should be about.
You can only have an abundant society when everything is geared towards sustainability and sharing.
>>808664humanity has already produced more than enough for everyone for a long time. the problem isn't production, it's distribution. people who labor get very little of the surplus product, and people who own means of production get a lot of the surplus product. also capitalists contrive to destroy excess goods when prices get too low, instead of giving them away.
Listen to this.
>>809170>if you want to live like america then it's impossiblecommodities get destroyed before they even reach consumers in a contrivance to raise prices. when you look at average american consumption statistics it is not the median because it is lumping in hyper rich outliers and corporate waste. we have been capable of producing more than enough stuff to meet everyone's basic needs for a very long time but if people can't be threatened with poverty they can't be coerced as easily so we refuse to move onto a new economic system.
𝚠𝚑𝚘 𝚐𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑
Can we have a wordfilter that changes “Elon Musk” into “Elongated Muskrat”?
I want to be owned
>>808664He should die a violent death in the next 10 years.
Unique IPs: 22